Top
Best
New

Posted by empressplay 18 hours ago

Claude Code Remote Control(code.claude.com)
479 points | 275 commentspage 3
quatonion 4 hours ago|
I used it to add a MIDI driver and support to my OS this afternoon. Worked okay, but I agree it is a bit clunky yet. I think it is pretty good for a preview release. Much better than nothing.
conesus 7 hours ago||
This new remote control handoff is neat but still requires you to remember to do the handoff. Oftentimes I’m waiting on an agent and then walk away.

I built Crabigator[1] and it's a wrapper around `claude` and `codex`, so its ready for coding on the go on start and already streaming. Plus, crabigator shows many parallel windows, separated by repo/project/machine, so you can manage multiple agents seamlessly.

[1]: https://drinkcrabigator.com

johnhamlin 6 hours ago||
New speed record for time from LaunchHN to getting Sherlocked set by that company everyone was dunking on a couple of weeks ago
piker 13 hours ago||
Running Claude Code from a phone just seems like a recipe for Alzheimer’s. Rest, then focus and build.
sp1nningaway 8 hours ago||
This kind of release shows Anthropic as a company is suffering from the same thing we all are right now. Removing the friction from having an idea and executing it stops you from remembering The Point. Yes, programming from your phone is an exciting modality and maybe even the future of how we work, but coding from your bedroom, AND the toilet, AND the woods AND your office is definitely (hopefully) not the future.

I wonder if is anyone working on an AI framework that encourages us to keep our eye on the big picture, then walk away when a reasonable amount of work is done for the day.

Yes, individuals are creating cool mobile coding solutions and Anthropic doesn't want to get left behind. I know I'm working my ass off at work right now because LLM coding makes it fun, but I also often don't prioritize what I'm doing for the big picture because I just try every thing that comes into my inbox, in order, because it's so fast to do with Claude Code.

We all sense it!: <https://newsroom.haas.berkeley.edu/ai-promised-to-free-up-wo...> <https://ghuntley.com/teleport/> <https://steve-yegge.medium.com/the-ai-vampire-eda6e4f07163>

embedding-shape 13 hours ago|||
There are two types of software engineers: Those who do and then think, or those who think and then do. Claude Code seems to strictly be for the former, while typically the engineers who can maintain software long-term are the latter.

Not sure if we have any LLM-tooling for the latter, seems to be more about how you use the tools we have available, but they're all pulling us to be "do first, think later" so unless you're careful, they'll just assume you want to do more and think less, hence all the vibeslop floating around.

viraptor 13 hours ago|||
> Claude Code seems to strictly be for the former, while typically the engineers who can maintain software long-term are the latter.

Given the number of CC users I know who spend significant time on creating/iterating designs and specs before moving to the coding phase, I can tell you, your assumption is wrong. Check how different people actually use it before projecting your views.

embedding-shape 12 hours ago||
Yeah, I wasn't trying to say "These are the people who use CC, for these purposes" but rather what the intention seems to for Claude Code in the first place. I'm using CC from time to time, to keep up to date with what tooling is available, and also know people who use CC every day and plan a lot up front, sorry if I gave the impression that I meant that everyone using CC is doing that, was trying to get at what the purpose of the tool seems to be, which seems to be true today too, as the models continuously seem to steer you to "doing" and moving faster, not stopping and thinking.
prescriptivist 11 hours ago||||
This seems like a real coarse and not particularly accurate binary, but even if it were true, the thing about Claude Code and agentic coding like this is the cost of making a mistake or the cost of not being happy with a design and having to back it out is getting smaller and smaller.

I would argue that rapidly iterating reveals more about the problem, even for the most thoughtful of us. It's not like you check your own reasoning at the door when you just dive head first into something.

rafaelmn 13 hours ago||||
This isn't a binary thing - even if you prefer to build maintainable systems very often the trade-off is - you don't ship in time and there's no long term - the project gets scrapped.

So even if it comes at the expense of long term maintainability - everyone should have this in their toolbox.

Wowfunhappy 13 hours ago||||
I find it often helps me to see a feature before I evaluate if it was really a good idea in the first place. This is my failing--but one thing I like about Claude is that it's now possible to just try stuff and throw away whatever doesn't work out.
darkerside 12 hours ago||
Was always possible. Now just easier.
Wowfunhappy 3 hours ago||
Well, kind of I guess. I have limited hours in the day.
thinkindie 13 hours ago||||
I usually have conversations with Claude for clearing my mind and forming the scope of a project. I usually use voice transcription from Claude app to take notes and explore all my options.
kzahel 13 hours ago||
Same. When I can't be at my desk, my projects don't stop -- I just do the tasks that work well enough on the phone. Brainstorming, planning, etc. Or tasks that the agent can easily verify.

Having access to my local repository and my whole home folder is much easier than dealing with Claude or ChatGPT on the web. (Lots of manual markdown shuffling, passing in zipfiles of repositories, etc).

8note 7 hours ago||||
id say claude code is designed for think then do - thats where its different from other tools!

i think it still pulls to do then think because you cant tell what the agent understood of what you asked it to do from that first think, until its actually produced something.

ubercore 13 hours ago||||
I agree in your basic framing but not your conclusion. Met plenty of do-ers before thinkers that are self-aware enough to also maintain software longterm.
mhalle 13 hours ago||||
I would definitely disagree.

Claude Code and similar agents help me execute experiments, prototypes and full designs based on ideas that I have been refining in my head for years, but never had the time or resources to implement.

They also help get me past design paralysis driven by overthinking.

Perhaps the difference between acceleration and slop is the experience to know what to keep, what to throw away, and what to keep refining.

tayo42 11 hours ago|||
These coding tools work better when you think and play first before doing...
elif 13 hours ago|||
One could just as easily argue hunching over your desk staring at your computer has neurological implications.

My favorite way to vibe code is by voice while in the hot tub. Rest AND focus AND build.

ryanmcl 12 hours ago||
This is the real insight in this thread. The false binary of "rest OR work" is dissolving. I do some of my best problem-solving while walking my kid to school or making lunch...the context switch lets things percolate. Having a way to capture that momentum without needing to rush back to my desk and remember what I was thinking would be genuinely useful. The interface matters less than the latency between idea and execution.
bwestergard 11 hours ago|||
"The false binary of "rest OR work" is dissolving."

If you're like most people in this forum, there are people who stand to gain financially if you convince yourself that you don't need boundaries between work and rest. You may even believe that you stand to gain financially, and that this will be best for you in the long term.

Please, take some time to rest for a day or two and really think about what you want your boundaries to be. Write them down.

ryanmcl 43 minutes ago||
You're right, and I appreciate the reminder. I should clarify; I don't mean always-on work. More that the rigid "only think about code when seated at desk" constraint sometimes means losing genuine insights that surface during downtime. But you're correct that without intentional boundaries that mindset can slide into something unhealthy fast.
embedding-shape 10 hours ago||||
> The false binary of "rest OR work" is dissolving

Sounds like someone hasn't yet worked multiple years with software engineering, or any job for that matter.

Your mind might trick you into believing it won't matter, but your body and mind NEEDS to be disconnected from work, 100%, at some point during your regular rhythms of life, otherwise you'll burn out much faster than the people you seemingly are trying to compete with.

Life never been a sprint, but it is a marathon, and if you spend all your young experience-less years on treating it as a sprint, you won't have any energy left for completing the marathon.

Take care of yourself, your mind and your body.

ryanmcl 42 minutes ago|||
This is fair and well taken. For context I'm 45 with a 6 year old son / I've done the burnout thing in a previous career and have no interest in repeating it. But I hear you and the point stands regardless of my specific situation.
gtowey 4 hours ago|||
How is this not solved by a simple voice recorder? You can process and act on it later while not forgetting your thoughts when inspiration hits. People have been doing that for at least like 50 years now.
brookst 12 hours ago|||
Wait why should I prefer being stuck in the office over taking a walk and periodically steering Claude code by phone?
thierrydamiba 13 hours ago||
On the other hand, you lose a lot of time if you step away from a session and it gets stuck asking for permission to do something simple.
wiseowise 13 hours ago||
Oh no! Anyway.
thierrydamiba 13 hours ago||
I don’t understand this comment?

I’m guessing you’re suggesting it’s ok to lose time if you’re away from your computer enjoying life, and I agree. I also don’t see the issue in finding ways to be save time with work.

If you mean something different, please elaborate.

rob 10 hours ago||
I would have hoped for them to at least support the "/clear" command or some form of it, especially to manage context if we're limited to a single session between the terminal and Claude iOS app. I like to work on things one at a time and /clear my way between them to get back to 0% context, which seems impossible with the current setup here?

Typing "/clear" in the terminal clears it, but the Claude iOS app just outputs raw XML instead and doesn't actually do anything:

    <command-name>/clear</command-name>
    <command-message>clear</command-message>
    <command-args></command-args>

    <local-command-stdout></local-command-stdout>
siva7 7 hours ago||
I don't think they target the pros here who already solved this problem with vpn/tmux/ssh but to those whose thrilled serious reaction will be "whoaaa crazy i can command claude code now from my phone while on the toilet or on a date?" It's basically a defense attempt against Openclaw.
qwertox 6 hours ago||
I would rather have them commit to make a standard out of --sdk-url. I really want to use it in production, but it being undocumented means they can take it away anytime, so stdout it has to be (and hooks).
pshirshov 15 hours ago||
That's what I've been doing with termux, mosh, and tmux.
konaraddi 12 hours ago||
I think a significant distinction between your approach and Claude’s approach is that your approach requires allowing your machine to accept inbound connections but Claude’s approach does not. Claude probably went with the latter to avoid a whole class of security issues and mitigate risk of users having their machines compromised. I’m not familiar with what the new vectors of attack are with Claude’s approach though.
kzahel 14 hours ago|||
Yeah the remote control featureset is pretty limited right now. I did a comparison here https://yepanywhere.com/claude-code-remote-control/ (with my own project). I'm sure they'll iterate on it. Overall it's such an obvious feature for them to add I'm surprised it took them so long to ship. There are probably at least 50 such projects that people have made (https://github.com/kzahel/yepanywhere/blob/main/docs/competi...)

The one feature drawback of tailscale/tmux/termius is no file upload. And ergonomics, ability to view files/diffs easily, though that's subjective.

cess11 14 hours ago||
Perhaps it took a while to figure out how to do it over HTTP, especially the security stuff.

With e.g. tmux you'll piggyback on decades of SSH development.

Myzel394 14 hours ago||
> SSH development.

Or Mosh, just like OP said. Mosh handles interruptions much better than SSH does

cess11 13 hours ago||
As I understand it, Mosh piggybacks on SSH. Have they recently dropped the SSH negotiation?
samusiam 14 hours ago||
Which is so much better because you can do other terminal stuff and you can avoid vendor lock in.
dewey 13 hours ago||
That's not what vendor lock in means. If you sign up for a cloud hoster and then build your whole product on propriety services that you can't get anywhere else instead of using an off the shelf database or open source software, that's vendor lock in.

If you'd have to switch to a different tool to do your coding that's not vendor lock in.

pshirshov 11 hours ago||
In this case you are locking your workflow to the vendor's solution.
smallerfish 10 hours ago|
This seems like an excellent thread to plug the TUI I've been working on that makes using bubblewrap relatively easy and somewhat pleasant. I have a recipe in the README for using it with Claude. Granted that Claude has --sandbox, but probably better that sandboxing be done by something outside of the Anthropic ecosystem.

https://github.com/reubenfirmin/bubblewrap-tui

More comments...