Top
Best
New

Posted by zhisme 17 hours ago

Get free Claude max 20x for open-source maintainers(claude.com)
410 points | 189 commentspage 3
nitinreddy88 12 hours ago|
Essentially they want you to use it for 6 months and then hook you up to their paid offerings. Smart
sega_sai 11 hours ago||
5000 stars. That's an interesting threshold. I've checked and astropy -- the main python module used by pretty much every python user in astrophysics has 5100 stars. I would guess almost no open source code in science would pass the threshold.

EDIT: Just another test, one of the most used codes in astro -- an ensemble Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo sampler https://github.com/dfm/emcee has 1600 stars. It just shows the 5000 stars is a bit PR, rather than a serious attempt to help open source.

andersmurphy 9 hours ago||
On the bright side it means mostly JS/TS libraries will get slopified (as they tend to have the most stars thanks to ecosystem size). Small mercies.
isodev 11 hours ago|||
Number of stars also excludes self hosted forges. Stars is more of a GitHub-wants-to-be-a-social thing than actual measure of popularity.
cmrdporcupine 11 hours ago||
Yeah, I was going to come here to say this. Apart from a) stars are a dubious metric b) 5000 stars is an insanely high bar, there is the issue that there are definitely lots of projects that choose not to partake in GitHub at this point.

That said, they do have a "contact us" line in there which implies some flexibility.

ryandrake 11 hours ago|||
You can easily buy stars in bulk, like you can buy social media “likes” so they are kind of measuring the wrong thing and incentivizing the wrong behaviors.
jefftk 10 hours ago|||
It also strongly favors older projects, since stars don't expire and they've had longer to accumulate them.
limagnolia 8 hours ago||
I don't even star the vast majority of packages I use... I usually only star repos I don't use but find interesting and may want to refer back to in the future.

And completely excludes projects not hosted on Microsoft's GitHub or NPM (Though they do say you can contact them if you don't meet their insane criteria).

mittermayr 11 hours ago||
I may sound unthankful here, but it just very strongly smells of Antropic amping up their PR campaigning lately, even the headline on the post reads offputting.

Plus, while 6 months is better than 1 month, why isn't it a recurring deal (or token-limited), which renews after check-ins (like educational discounts do). This sounds like an Apple TV+ offer you get for every Apple product you buy. A hook, more than a treat.

In this case, I guess it's just a slimy approach to building a self-selected lead list of people you can hard-hit with upsells after the 6 months.

Thank you for everything you ship*

*there's a 6 months limit we have on gratitute.

cperciva 11 hours ago|
I'm guessing that this is an initial trial and they're intending to extend it further; 6 months is a reasonable trial period given the very rough metric for deciding who qualifies.
mittermayr 11 hours ago|||
> Your complimentary subscription will expire at the end of the Benefit Period. After expiration, any existing subscription will continue unless you cancel. You may independently choose to purchase a paid Claude subscription at the then-current price through Anthropic’s standard signup process.

https://www.anthropic.com/claude-for-oss-terms

cperciva 10 hours ago||
Sure. They're still figuring out exactly how to decide who qualifies for this -- seriously, 5000 github stars or 1M monthly NPM downloads? -- and they don't want to make long-term promises to people who might not qualify under future better-thought-out rules.

That doesn't mean they're not going to continue this, it just means they're being careful not to make promises which they'll want to roll back later.

miroljub 10 hours ago||
"Contact the sales"

No, thanks. I decided I don't want to play those games. I get MiniMax unlimited for 10$ per month, and free GitHub Copilot as an open source maintainer and contributor.

I don't need to beg to get some free stuff, only to later realize the only way to use it is through the shitty Claude Code.

iberator 9 hours ago||
Now suddenly everyone's gonna become a 'maintainer'. People are gonna abuse it and just use it for everything else BUT proper(not fake and AI GENERATED) open source projects.

Sad day. I hope so they are gonna change the TOS and punish anyone with a 1 million $ fine if someone lies.

That's the only way: criminal charges for students using AI(when forbidden such as academia) and people who plan to abuse it (stealing tokens against TOS).

it's impossible to compete with cheaters and with cheaters who stole money

randusername 8 hours ago||
Scraping data, well that's just okay...

What if we get proven code some other way?

Give our tools for free to prove their worth

No one will guess this is astroturf

A special program, with a special account

To get labeled data worth a big amount

FiberBundle 8 hours ago||
I'm kind of sceptical about the altruistic motives here. Giving this to open source maintainers also solves the problem of identifying high quality feedback/rewards for their rlvr models. With everybody using Claude code it might be difficult for them to find a robust way to tell apart good reward signal from mediocre or below average feedback.
Thrymr 8 hours ago||
"free as in cocaine", for 6 months.
kyle-rb 8 hours ago|
Cocaine? The Yandex PaaS?

https://github.com/cocaine

ramon156 6 hours ago|
So open source contributors are not eligible? I know it's kind of petty to look at free stuff and go "but what about me?" But I got excited for no reason.
hinkley 1 hour ago|
We are not ready for that.
More comments...