Top
Best
New

Posted by BloondAndDoom 1 day ago

We Will Not Be Divided(notdivided.org)
2581 points | 822 commentspage 13
lovich 1 day ago|
You’re kinda already conceding to some of your opponents points when you use legally invalid names like “Department of War”

I appreciate the sentiment but don’t preconcede to your opposition by using their framing.

uniq7 1 day ago||
In this case I think the opponents made a huge mistake by calling themselves Department of War, and it's something that can be exploited.

Department of Defense was the actual lie, the newspeak term. They were not really defending anything, they were using military power globally for pursuing economic interests. However, it was easy to convince people that the whole endeavor was a good thing, because defending your country against the baddies is good, and you should support anyone doing that (otherwise you'd be a traitor!). Thank you for your service (defending us).

On the other hand, the term Department of War is hard to sell, because most people don't want to participate in a war or support someone who wants to start one. Thank you for your service... invading other countries? killing and raping innocents? ransacking resources?

This is an irrelevant detail, but if I'd read the title "Department of Defense vs. Meta", I'd first think Meta is leaking confidential info to other countries. However, if I'd read "Department of War vs. Meta", I'd think Meta doesn't want to promote an unnecessary war.

Vaslo 1 day ago|||
"Legally Invalid" lol - what?
lovich 1 day ago||
Yeah, it takes an act of Congress to rename a part of the government, normally it’s a milquetoast event like renaming a postal office, but this admin thinks the law doesn’t apply to them.

Currently the government executive branch is claiming they have that right and the legislative branch can get fucked.

I am taking advice from the current executive admin around names and continuing to call the Department of Defense by their biological name.

mulmen 1 day ago|||
I'm disappointed Anthropic made this mistake as well.
greenranger 1 day ago||
[dead]
jurschreuder 1 day ago||
They always already wanted it to be Grok, Grok is the only, what they call "not woke AI".
bufio 21 hours ago||
Hacker news?
amelius 1 day ago||
Hegseth is discovering the shittiness of the SaaS model.
uwagar 1 day ago||
isnt the pentagon just asking for total access to source code and data silos of anthropic and openai...that we cant ask because its proprietary software?
senderista 1 day ago||
"We hope our leaders will put aside their differences and stand together"
nullbyte 1 day ago||
"He will not divide us!"
leonflexo 1 day ago||
What's that, a little speaker?
nom 1 day ago||
I miss those times :(
xeonmc 1 day ago||
Club Penguin was a gem. Now all we get are Roblox.
Samarrrtthh 1 day ago||
why
moogly 1 day ago||
We have international laws and rules of war. We have weapon treaties (well, some of them are expiring). Sure, not everyone is signatory, or even follow the conventions they have ratified, but at least having these things in place makes it even remotely possible to categorize and document violations and start processes towards rulebreakers and antihumanist actions.

So I looked into what they cooked up in 2023, plus which countries signed it (scroll down to a link to the actual text). It's an extraordinarily pathetic text. Insulting even.

https://www.state.gov/bureau-of-arms-control-deterrence-and-...

alsufinow 1 day ago|
W
More comments...