Top
Best
New

Posted by TSiege 5 hours ago

Iran War Cost Tracker(iran-cost-ticker.com)
259 points | 325 commentspage 2
tzahifadida 2 hours ago|
What would have happened if the US dis not get involved in WWII. We would probably not be here... Not everything is short sighted bean counters. Having major cities explode by nuclear devices in the US will surely cost more.
Jtsummers 2 hours ago||
Iran has been weeks away from a nuke for decades. What evidence is there that they were any closer this time, or that this war was necessary to delay or block their progress?
password54321 2 hours ago|||
The war is for Israel, sorry I should say Greater Israel.
lukan 2 hours ago|||
I vaguely remember a similar situation last year, where Trump said, Irans nuclear program is now destroyed for years to come.
Jtsummers 1 hour ago||
Yep, the Iran chicken hawks can't keep their stories straight.

Trump's chicken hawk fanboys:

- Iran is weeks away from nukes, but our bombing runs last year were so successful they're now years away. But now they're weeks away again, got to attack!

- We're not the world's police, but Iran killed 30k of their own citizens, we need to help them and be the world's police!

- The Iranians were going to attack US bases because of an Israeli attack, so to prevent those attacks we attacked first. Thus giving them no reason to bomb our bases. Oh god, they're bombing our bases! The fiends!

karmakurtisaani 1 hour ago|||
I'm sorry but this is a braindead take. Trump is exactly a short-sighted .. well not a bean counter since I doubt his ability to count. But short sighted for sure.

Thinking an Iranian nuke is threatening a US city is probably a Fox news talking point, so dogshit by definition.

cindyllm 1 hour ago||
[dead]
roncesvalles 2 hours ago||
Exactly. The alternative was to let Iran (while under a suicidal theocratic regime) get nukes? Imagine if Dubai was struck by nukes instead of drones.
galleywest200 2 hours ago|||
We had a nuclear deal with them, which was ripped up by the same man currently in charge of the US.
password54321 2 hours ago|||
The alternative was not bombing them in the middle of negotiations.
stopbulying 4 hours ago||
Could add: Civilian casualty ratio by party

(Civilian casualty ratios in recent conflicts and declared wars)

Quarrelsome 3 hours ago||
not providing universal healthcare is a choice, as seen directly here. Its distressing to have US politicians make false claims that Europe's universal healthcare being something they "indirectly pay for", because even if Europe spent all their money on defence the US (albeit mostly the GOP) would still resist providing universal healthcare both tooth and nail.
danny_codes 3 hours ago|
Universal healthcare is cheaper than our system of healthcare by a factor of 2 (comparing other OECD countries). If we raised taxes and implemented universal healthcare we’d save about $1T a year.

Cost isn’t the relevant factor, it’s politics. Or more accurately, naked bribery that we, for some insane reason, call “lobbying”.

ineedaj0b 2 hours ago|||
I've looked into this for work and no way. You must unfactor the European models getting subsidized by the current US model.

Some very smart people have looked at fixing the system, and there's no golden goose (except ozempic maybe). We'll need pharmacological breakthroughs.

Also, regrettably - A LOT of medical care is unnecessary but we love grandma.

Quarrelsome 2 hours ago||
> You must unfactor the European models getting subsidized by the current US model.

But they don't. This is clearly a pro-insurer talking point. Europe just negotiates on a state based level so therefore is able to negotiate better prices.

Amezarak 2 hours ago||
Medicare also negotiates on a state based level and represents more people than most European countries.

Right now the US governments collectively spend more than most European countries per capita on health care. The states and Feds. Totally exclusive of the private market spending. Expanding Medicare/Medicaid may be great for other reasons but does not solve the underlying cost problems in the US.

Quarrelsome 1 hour ago||
> but does not solve the underlying cost problems in the US.

sure but neither does blaming the EU for its healthcare system as some odd mental gymnastics into twisting it into a rationale about why universal healthcare "isn't possible" in the US.

Its a choice the US makes, while creating huge deficits fighting pointless wars at the same time.

DarmokJalad1701 3 hours ago|||
> If we raised taxes and implemented universal healthcare we’d save about $1T a year

If it saves $1T, then why does it require raising taxes?

mekdoonggi 2 hours ago|||
Because currently the working population pays what is effectively a tax for health insurance. I pay over $450 a month for a family plan, and that's cheap and subsidized AND I need to pay for copays/deductible/coinsurance.

So taxes could go up $5k/yr but if I got health insurance, I'm better off.

The savings would take longer to realize because they come from better contracts, better preventative care, increased screenings etc.

Quarrelsome 2 hours ago|||
idk maybe those savings are not upfront but are more around productivity improvements and so on.
fishingisfun 4 hours ago||
the lives lost though. the children killed.
RobRivera 4 hours ago||
Oh boy - defense accounting I LOVE this game.

Quick quick, give me a quote on the coffee maker on the AWACS.

wiseowise 2 hours ago||
2 billions in 4 days. Have you said thank you once?
hybrid_study 4 hours ago||
https://bsky.app/profile/rbreich.bsky.social/post/3mg4ige7o7...
jopsen 2 hours ago||
What about reparations? :)

This is an illegal war of aggressions after all.

The justifications all remain fanciful. I mean at least Bush bothered to make it appear legitimate.

koverda 3 hours ago||
neat! I made (vibecoded) and deployed something very similar yesterday https://iranwarcost.com
mcintyre1994 3 hours ago|
Wouldn’t most of these costs have been going for a few weeks, given the build up?
More comments...