Top
Best
New

Posted by romac 10 hours ago

Glaze by Raycast(www.glazeapp.com)
176 points | 103 commentspage 3
cdrnsf 7 hours ago|
I can't imagine trusting these apps with access to my camera, file system or any other sensitive permissions.
robinhood 9 hours ago||
Impressive feat. Definitely not for me though, and for sure I won't be there to debug one of these when my parents will call me because it broke their computers.
geooff_ 9 hours ago||
This is just a landing page. There's not even any decent product specs. Nothing technical. How does this make front page of hacker news?
smusamashah 9 hours ago||
It will be awesome if these were native apps instead of JavaScript apps. It's not mentioned anywhere explicitly that these are native.
Bishonen88 10 hours ago||
So, another wrapper around claude 4.6 for +xx% higher price? Using just claude code, one can do what glazeapp seems to aim for, no? "Beautiful by default" seems to be a system prompt akin to:

  Design Philosophy Create apps that feel premium, polished, and worthy of being featured on Dribbble's most popular shots. Every pixel matters. White space is your friend. Less is more, but what remains must be perfect.

  Visual Design Principles

  Color & Theming

  • Use sophisticated, limited color palettes (2-3 primary colors maximum) ...
xd1936 10 hours ago||
It looks like it's a lot of sensible defaults UI libraries to use, UX framework presets, etc, designed for an end user who doesn't know what Node or Electron or Rust or Tauri are. Plus, the page describes an app sharing mechanism as well built-in.
alxndr13 10 hours ago|||
To be honest, but I would love to have some ecosystem around building apps which lets me share my custom apps with team members in my organization. Without having to take care of updating, provisioning, and distributing the app, etc.

even better if the apps are not electron bloated and mac-native.

wbobeirne 10 hours ago|||
Reading what they're offering, the stand-out to me is making publishing the applications easy for others on your team to use. That would he a pain point for non technical users.
Bishonen88 10 hours ago||
I get your point. But if sharing with others is a vital part of this, then ... they'd be better off sticking to web apps instead :) "Create with glaze, hit publish and we'll give you an url".

Even though they portray some of the benefits of this app as unique to desktop apps, they're not (e.g. storing data on device, offline mode etc.).

Am not a hater. Love Raycast. Saw the post and opened the link intrigued what they came up with and was somewhat disappointed tbh. Good luck to them anyway!

mcintyre1994 10 hours ago||
I think their value add if you’re comfortable with Claude Code is probably some nice tooling for the packaging, and they probably sign apps for you too?
_pdp_ 9 hours ago||
How many apps do you really need that are not already done - perhaps even better?
hombre_fatal 9 hours ago||
I've vibe coded all sorts of apps for my macbook.

A better replacement to iStat Menus.

A local-only voice to text whisper.cpp transcriber I can globally use while holding ctrl-semicolon.

A menubar app that manages blocky and can easily turn it off or change dns.

A tool like hammerspoon but I configure it via nix-darwin and it has no cruft.

All of these are apps that use 30MB memory and are better than the apps they replace, and I can make changes any time I want. That's far better than using someone else's software and giving it privileged access to my machine.

Also, perhaps the best point is that so much software is junk that is obsoleted by someone with better UX intuitions even if they are vibe-coding it. Being written by hand by an engineer means basically nothing when it comes to "is this a good app?" Which is why product-minded people are the biggest winners in the new AI era.

ukuina 8 hours ago||
Neat! What does the stack look like?
WarmWash 8 hours ago|||
The problem that software suffers from is that every app/program tries to cover as many bases and use cases as possible in a single package. Obviously it's what you want to do if you want to maximize reach/customers.

Vibe apps are different. They do exactly what you want, exactly the way you want it done. No more downloading an app that is mysteriously 180MB and requires watching a youtube video to learn how to make it change your background every 5 minutes to different dog pictures.

elxr 8 hours ago|||
I can think of at least 1 major improvement to so many of the apps I use day to day.

Desktop software is nowhere near good enough to consider random usecases "already done". Not that glaze looks particularly special, but there's so many improvements the desktop experience begs for.

An easy to use cross-platform GUI builder for one. Even something as basic as a calendar app doesn't have a clear obvious winner today.

brandonmenc 8 hours ago|||
Literally hundreds.

In the DOS days, I would have whipped them up in BASIC. This was standard practice for PC users who were not "software engineers" by trade.

The complication of PCs over the past 30+ years have robbed regular users of this ability.

Tools like this close the gap, and that's awesome.

desantisll 8 hours ago||
how many problems do you have unsolved?
bpavuk 9 hours ago||
so many unknowns...

1. macOS and Windows require installation of Xcode and Visual Studio respectively, and if in Apple's case you kinda can install these tools headlessly and choose to install only the "build tools" package, Microsoft's creature is gonna daze and confuse you with a crap-ton of checkboxes and no easy "just install whatever is minimally needed to compile my code" button, and I don't recall if there is way to install build tools on Windows through terminal.

2. what is going to be distributed? source code itself or actual binaries? and what will the security model of Glaze store be? same as extensions, "everything is open-source and undergoes Raycast's and community review"?

3. Glaze is going to come to Windows and Linux, if we trust the Q&A section at the end. what will Glaze build upon? separate frameworks and languages for each platform or something multi-platform [1] like Tauri or Kotlin Multiplatform? or are you going to copy the Raycast extension model - just run Node, expose some platform integration, and parse React render trees through "Glaze Runtime"? I've been working on a bug in Vicinae [2][3], and I've seen this model in action. it's very hard to make it perform well, but all it takes to achieve native look and feel is to just map React render trees to whatever system component OS offers. (in Vicinae's case, it's Qt. bet that it's done with SwiftUI on macOS and WinUI 3 on Windows.)

[1]: there is a difference between "cross-platform" and "multi-platform". "cross-platform" means "I behave equally across platforms and have no awareness of native look and feel" (e.g. Electron, Unity, Flutter), while "multi-platform" means "I can adapt across platforms to the degree you need" (e.g. C/C++, Rust, KMP)

[2]: https://github.com/vicinaehq/vicinae

[3]: https://github.com/vicinaehq/vicinae/pull/1158

danpalmer 37 minutes ago|
I think we can make assumptions for all of these. Raycast extensions aren't compiled code, and run within the Raycast runtime/engine. I'd bet that this is exactly the same.

In many ways that's the same as Chrome apps, they have no code, they're just the Chrome binary, so there aren't any code signing issues.

mglvsky 9 hours ago||
what about barebone/starter desktop app that can be modified itself by prompts?

that's would be Electron app, but without unneeded bloat

etchalon 4 hours ago||
Vibe-coding desktop apps is a much, much better solution for the vast majority of one-off tools most users want to build.
orliesaurus 10 hours ago|
they did it again, glad I am on Mac, congrats raycast
More comments...