Top
Best
New

Posted by _____k 2 hours ago

Google ends its 30 percent app store fee and welcomes third-party app stores(www.engadget.com)
123 points | 40 comments
jadar 1 hour ago|
This is kind of a misleading title. While they "ended" the 30-percent cut, they are keeping a 20-percent cut.
upcoming-sesame 50 minutes ago||
worse title I've seen in a while
varispeed 17 minutes ago||
Soviet level of journalism...

“Did you hear? On Red Square they’re giving away cars.”

“Not quite. First, it’s not on Red Square but on Dzerzhinsky Square. Second, they’re not cars but bicycles. And third, they’re not giving them away, they’re stealing them.”

onlyrealcuzzo 48 minutes ago||
The majority of which is going directly to Visa, Amex, Mastercard.
Legend2440 12 minutes ago|||
Nah, credit card fees are like 1.5 to 3.5%.
john_strinlai 13 minutes ago|||
i dont believe any of those companies take anywhere near a 20% cut per transaction
bhelkey 2 minutes ago||
The article is confusingly worded. I think Google's announcement is more clear.

My read is:

* Developers using Google to process payments should expect to go from a 30% fee to a 25% fee (20% service fee + 5% billing fee).

* Subscriptions will now have a 15% fee (20% service fee + 5% billing fee)

* Some Third Party App Stores will be easier to install

[1] https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/03/a-new-era-...

elAhmo 7 minutes ago||
"Welcomes" is a very strong word in this context. Google was somewhat forced to do this, not really something they would do if not from pressure by EU, lawsuits, Epic and others.

Also, the fee is reduced to 20 or 15 percent, not fully gone.

This almost reads like a sponsored article written by Google themselves.

mqus 1 hour ago||
I only trust this once they have finally detailed how they will allow "easy sideloading" (See one of the last fdroid news on this, currently google is on track to basically ban sideloading as it exists) and what exactly means "registered app store program".
herf 4 minutes ago|
Sideloading without automatic updates is not very useful
delichon 1 hour ago||
It looks like they maintain gatekeeping via the Registered App Store program, where you get to be a kind of trustee while on good behavior.

https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/03/a-new-era-...

sheepscreek 1 hour ago||
Why are people thanking Google? That’s like another slap on the face of Epic who burned through their millions to put a (soft) end to Google and Apple’s dominance. They still get to keep a significant cut.
irishcoffee 22 seconds ago||
> Epic who burned through their millions

I wouldn't die on this hill. Epic is about as un-sympathetic character in the videogame space as you'll find anywhere. Epic wasn't trying to be altruistic.

kgwxd 1 hour ago|||
Epic still deserves all the slaps it gets. They didn't do it for the good of the people. They just want to abuse their own position more efficiently.
ericmay 30 minutes ago|||
Yep. Spot on. And the reason you know this is true is because the arguments about increasing prices for customers due to App Store fees, which is one of the primary arguments, once removed does not result in price reductions for customers.

It's just big billion dollar corporations deciding on who keeps what cut.

hogwasher 6 minutes ago||
I'm hardly a fan of Epic, but considering inflation and rising supply chain costs, a price that remains flat may be a price that would have otherwise risen.

They might also direct the money towards funding more exclusives. Epic's funding has enabled some games to be made that wouldn't have been otherwise, or that wouldn't have been as full featured without that up-front cash.

They sell gambling to children via lootboxes; I'm not saying they're the good guy corp. But removing Apple and Google's monopoly over phone apps and app stores would only be a good thing, in my opinion.

zarzavat 51 minutes ago|||
Honestly I believe they did it because Tim Sweeney has fuck you money and he got pissed off at Apple.
charcircuit 1 hour ago||
Google gets a 0% cut on Fortnite purchases in this new model.
krunck 1 hour ago||
'Google says that developers will be able to offer alternative billing systems alongside its own or "guide users outside of their app to their own websites for purchases." '

Finally. As a de-Googled phone owner I am glad that this will allow alternative payments where I can pay developers directly without Google taking it's protection money.

pingou 48 minutes ago||
Am I correct that if you earn less than a million dollar a year and wish to continue using Google services it changes nothing? You will pay 10% service fee + 5% billing fee, the same as the old 15% fee?
indy 1 hour ago||
This together with Valve's work on Fex may mean that Android users will be able to install Steam on their devices
TGower 1 hour ago||
Fex is not coming to Android https://wiki.fex-emu.com/index.php/FAQ
vladxyz 46 minutes ago||
Fex is already running on android, within things like https://github.com/utkarshdalal/GameNative
bsimpson 1 hour ago||
Kind of funny to imagine installing the mobile Epic store on a Steam device to get access to the mobile apps that you would otherwise need Google Play Services to access.

I think Amazon finally killed its app store. I wonder if there are any others that have the clout and inclination to register as an alternative app store and actually get developers to bother uploading there.

CivBase 3 minutes ago|
They're only bumping it down to 20% (or 15% in some cases). Anything over 5% feels like an abuse of their anti-competitive position.

And they're still taking 10% for subscriptions. What's the justification there?

More comments...