Top
Best
New

Posted by photon_collider 20 hours ago

My Homelab Setup(bryananthonio.com)
249 points | 164 commentspage 3
EdNutting 18 hours ago|
Have a look at Headscale to avoid the cost of Tailscale for small home setups.
SauntSolaire 15 hours ago||
I believe Tailscale is free to use for small home setups. It's limited to 3 users and 100 devices which has been plenty for my homelab setup.
drnick1 17 hours ago|||
This, or simply expose a VPN (Wireguard) port on a public IP. I don't see why you need to involve any third parties in such a setup.
EdNutting 16 hours ago||
For a single machine, yeah Wireguard is fine. For my multi-user multi-machine many-service home lab, it’s quite helpful to have the extra small features that Headscale offers (and some it exposes in a more convenient way).

Edit: Tailscale has a fairly frank page on Wireguard vs Tailscale with suggestions on when to use which: https://tailscale.com/compare/wireguard

miloschwartz 13 hours ago||
Pangolin is also a good choice. Can be fully self-hosted. Also based on WireGuard.

Handles both browser-based reverse proxy access and client-based P2P connections like a VPN.

buckle8017 10 hours ago||
Get yourself a custom domain and just use subdomains. Nothing says a public dns server has to return public ips. Bonus you can get https certs with certbot and dns challenge.
sbinnee 13 hours ago||
I learned about Mealie.io, thanks.
sgt 19 hours ago||
This is extremely light - not a bad setup, but I mean.. it's like 1% of typical Homelabs.
tclancy 17 hours ago||
Mother of God, why make this comment? It’s the poster’s setup and they are happy with it. What possible value could denigrating it do? The ol’ ball coach breakin’ em down to build em up shtick is gone and I don’t miss it.
sgt 17 hours ago||
Didn't mean it that way - and for that I apologize. I was just expecting a lot more since it was on the front page.
tclancy 16 hours ago|||
No worries Sarge and thanks for keeping the kids alive out there.
sgt 15 hours ago||
It's a pleasure, Tom! May I call you Tom?
tclancy 14 hours ago||
Can't hurt.
switchbak 19 hours ago|||
It feels like day 2 after you’ve received the new hard drives. It’s nice, modern enough but still a pretty bog standard home machine, not really “homelab” territory yet.
akerl_ 18 hours ago|||
Why do we need to gatekeep “homelab”?
PunchyHamster 18 hours ago||
Terms making defined sense aid in conversation.

Why do you need to dilute the term? There is nothing wrong with your NAS running 3 apps that you press update once a year not being called "homelab" but just "a NAS"

akerl_ 18 hours ago|||
> Why do you need to dilute the term?

Nobody is diluting anything. This person posted the setup they have in their home. It’s their homelab.

It’s not diluting any terms for them to call it that. Their setup is just as much a homelab as somebody else’s 48U rack.

It’s just a dick move, and against the rules of the site, to see somebody’s earnest post about their tech setup and post a shallow dismissal about how their setup isn’t deserving of your imagined barrier to entry.

PunchyHamster 14 hours ago|||
They are not researching anything. They just want to have few things running.

The whole idea of homelab (regardless of size) is learning first.

He just have home server. It's okay to call it that

akerl_ 14 hours ago||
Oh. Now the imaginary gate is “research”?
tokyobreakfast 10 hours ago|||
Quit whining, you know damn well the bar for a typical "Show HN" has been raised to the point of being irrelevant these days, this post is a perfect example. This is not a home lab.

I'm happy for the OP and that it works for him. That said:

The equivalent of Joe Bloggs installing Linux onto an old laptop is neither curious nor interesting, let's not pretend it is because feelings.

akerl_ 9 hours ago||
This isn't a Show HN, and also I think you mean "lowered" given the tone of your post.

It's also been on the front page for most of the day on its own merits. It's clear you don't like the article. The guidelines are clear that you're expected to either engage constructively or just move along.

anon7000 18 hours ago|||
I think if you’re playing around with apps & Tailscale on your NAS, it’s a homelab.
sgt 19 hours ago|||
Exactly. And I don't mind this being on the HN front page, but I'd like to see some proper Homelab setups here. Maybe someone can post the coolest setup they've seen so far?
skyberrys 18 hours ago|||
I too was wondering what made this a homelab. I appreciate the setup, but from the word lab I was expecting at least an oscilloscope. That being said it has cool features I hadn't known about like the image storing system and at home LLM support.
tclancy 17 hours ago||
Deeply suspect it has to do with being in the authors home.
HelloUsername 18 hours ago|||
> This is extremely light

I'm curious about its power consumption on idle, average use, and peak.

Scene_Cast2 18 hours ago||
Of typical homelabs that are posted and discussed.

The online activity of the homelab community leans towards those who treat it as an enjoyable hobby as opposed to a pragmatic solution.

I'm on the other side of the spectrum. Devops is (at best) a neutral activity; I personally do it because I strongly dislike companies being able to do a rug-pull. I don't think you'll see setups like mine too often, as there isn't anything to brag about or to show off.

ritcgab 17 hours ago||
Hard pass whenever you host long-term storage without ECC memory.
yowang 6 hours ago||
[dead]
tokyobreakfast 19 hours ago|
[flagged]