Top
Best
New

Posted by newer_vienna 3 hours ago

DARPA's new X-76(www.darpa.mil)
73 points | 62 comments
mrDmrTmrJ 1 hour ago|
To be clear, this is not a power-point program but a continuation of a long-standing design work with Bell.

Two articles that cover this in depth are: 1. Revised Fold-Away Rotor Aircraft Concepts Emerge From Special Operations X-Plane Program. December 2024: https://www.twz.com/air/revised-fold-away-rotor-aircraft-con...

2. Bell’s Plan To Finally Realize A Rotorcraft That Flies Like A Jet But Hovers Like A Helicopter. September 2021: https://www.twz.com/41997/bells-plan-to-finally-realize-a-ro...

The second article covers decades of prior wind tunnel testing on the folding rotor concept.

moralestapia 32 minutes ago|
>decades of prior wind tunnel testing on the folding rotor concept

Oof, I wish I had a job like that.

mikkupikku 5 minutes ago||
Why won't they adopt one of Sikorsky's compound helicopters already? They're beautiful and elegant solutions to this problem.
dmbche 1 hour ago||
Design remings me of something...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accidents_and_incidents_involv...

porphyra 2 hours ago||
Cool, I guess this should be able to hover in much more "austere" environments than the F-35B STOVL and the Harrier Jet. Tiltrotor with folding rotor blades sounds very mechanically complex and challenging though.
PowerElectronix 2 hours ago||
It looks like a maintenance nightmare with those clutches to decouple the blades and the mechanisms to have them folded during cruising. Does it even improve substantially in anh metric over the V280 to put money into it?
cucumber3732842 2 hours ago||
The V280 is designed to be cheap (a very relative term here).

Reading between the lines, I suspect "fast, but also expensive" was a design option that popped up and was not chosen earlier in the V280 program and now Darpa wants to pay to see where it goes.

Zigurd 1 hour ago||
Hard to be more expensive than F-35B.
rluna828 1 hour ago||
it also has stealth. This is a complete disaster. The only purpose of this stealth ship is to steal leaders and or go inside cave lairs and blow them up.
ocdtrekkie 26 minutes ago||
I'm confident with the stellar service and safety record of the V-22 that an even more complex tiltrotor will be a standout success for the military.
wartywhoa23 16 minutes ago|
16 hull losses per ~400 units built is not exactly a stellar safety record.

Or I guess you mean /stellar?

radicalethics 1 hour ago||
I wonder what the motivation behind this is. Tactically, why ever show your latest weapon? What is the strategic purpose of this? It's like if I message my opponent in SC2 and tell them exactly what I'm going to tech to. That's ... insane right? Why would anyone do that?
benjcpalm 1 hour ago||
It's not a tactical choice- it's strategic deterrence, and it's not insane at all!

The US has always had a policy of messaging programs, with a lean toward classifying some percentage of the specific capabilities.

There's a reason that F-35 program was publicized by the US government as the program was under development. It makes the US air force even scarier, which discourages adversaries from thinking about conventional warfare with America.

That said- you won't see any detailed pics of the inside of an F35 cockpit, or a detailed look at the heads up display in the fancy helmet. That's top secret, because those making those details public don't offer enough additional deterrence to justify the risk to the program.

bityard 51 minutes ago|||
Yes, but even if the US didn't release the specifications of the F35, other countries around the world would rapidly figure out most of the capabilities anyway from photos, videos, and casual observation. (In other words, they'd know soon enough WHAT it can do but not necessarily HOW it does it.)
bityard 58 minutes ago|||
This isn't a new weapon, this is a test platform for various ideas, none of which are new or secret. Also, there are not many groundbreaking advancements left in military aviation. Most are just fairly incremental engineering or manufacturing improvements. (Military space technology might be a different story, though.)

The only other nation with the potential to develop a high-tech military plane that could rival US technology would be China. But if we ever got into a war with China, they wouldn't need superior technology to win. They could win via superior manufacturing capacity and the sheer number of people they can draft into service at a moment's notice.

foobarian 43 minutes ago||
They could just cease all shipping. The consequences would be legendary.
Alan_Writer 58 minutes ago||
I think they just show what it can be seen, like any country with advance military developments.

They won't show you everything.

Have you ever heard about those sound/sonic (or something similar) weapons the US used in Maduro's kidnap operation? Venezuelan soldiers said (pero some publications on the internet) that they never saw anything alike, leaving them completely disoriented and helpless?

Soldiers now can even see thermal figures through walls or solid materiales, and the same time, bacome invisibles.

It's more than sci-fi.

ceejayoz 2 hours ago||
So it's an Osprey with a jet in the back?
torginus 2 hours ago||
Usually with these programs, they just commission an artist with some vague description, like they tell him to draw a futuristic VTOL aircraft, these pics have zero bearing on what gets delivered.

Sometimes they even take the piss with this, like in this video for a next-gen engine, where you can see their engine doesn't even fit in their fantasy aircraft:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCHun6rxQm0

huflungdung 2 hours ago||
[dead]
kuprel 1 hour ago||
From the image it doesn't look balanced for VTOL when the propellors are vertical. Also are the jets enabled during VTOL?
bilsbie 1 hour ago|
So it has jet engines that blades unfold and attach to during takeoff and landing? Why not always use the blades?
rluna828 1 hour ago|
stealth
More comments...