This isn't just a good idea -- it's a forward-thinking policy to ensure Hacker News remains a collaborative place to have meaningful discussions for years to come.

If a comment is useful I don't really care if it was written by a human or not unless the speaker somehow matters more than the content.

Why? I consider myself almost human...

So is this the AI bubble popping?

I expect Y Combinator to cease and revoke all funding of all companies that leverage LLM technologies that interact with humans.

I wonder if there's an AI-hate movement in China.

My expectations to dear fellow humans - more sophisticated personal insults (ex. give me your cute comments), a freudian slips, hidden messages and motives, first viewer experience with the next cool toy from the hype train, sharing all kind of insecurities, heavy f.. word if very dramatic first person experience happened, border line exposure to the insider info, sharing something your corporate HR gestapo wont appreciate but might help another guy on the line, "i knew the guy who actually did it" stories, motivational statement toward my non-native english, etc

->> ◕ ‿ ◕ <<--

I just found the xkcd that expresses my opinion on this:

https://xkcd.com/810/

I am surprised that apparently I am in a minority here.

You're absolutely right...

Can we get instant temp bans for any comment that starts with:

I asked [insert LLM here] about this, and it said [nonsense goes here]

I feel Like I see it less this week, but every time I do see it I wonder why they are even here.

Too bad there isn’t a complementary rule about not asking “is it just me or does this article read like AI slop?”

I’m so over these comments. Sure I can flag them but I feel like it deserves a special call out.