Top
Best
New

Posted by speckx 5 hours ago

Asia rolls out 4-day weeks, WFH to solve fuel crisis caused by Iran war(fortune.com)
317 points | 233 commentspage 2
htx80nerd 3 hours ago|
You could never do this in America because 50x judges would pile on and there'd be 100x lawsuits.
asdff 1 hour ago|
Labor laws in the US are designed for companies to skirt around the spirit of the law to satisfy the letter of the law. Probably to prevent rioting in the street from making people realize they haven't won the change they thought. Case in point, certain benefits that kick in at 40 hours to you know help people out.

Companies responded by saying awe shucks, guess we will only schedule you 39 hours and if you want more you have to work another job. Oh and the law only cares about hours done at one job so doesn't matter if you are working 120 hour weeks you only get part time benefits.

stephbook 29 minutes ago||
The US air force literally bombs striking union workers (yes, US citizens in the US) when needed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Blair_Mountain

butILoveLife 5 hours ago||
Makes sense for short term damage control. However, I think in the medium and long term you end up having productivity hits from such measures.

I know its unpopular to say, but when I have my 2 programmers in office, we get sooo much more done than at home. Someone gets stuck and we don't message/call, we just talk.

Although, if you want to justify WFH, introverted-like people do not get the same level of benefit as extroverted-like people in this situation. The extroverted people will just start talking. The introverted people need to be asked.

throwaway82931 4 hours ago||
> when I have my 2 programmers in office

I'd like to think that you see "my 2 programmers" as "my team" but I've come to expect phrasing like "when we have our 2 programmers in office". That perspective emphasizes that we're all in this together, rather than serfs working for the benefit of the lord.

The "my programmers" phrasing plays into my prejudice that one reason you like having "your programmers" in office is the exhilaration you feel in seeing them at your beck and call.

blell 2 hours ago||
Yep, your comment is deranged.
roadside_picnic 3 hours ago|||
Sounds like you don't have a lot of remote work experience.

The majority of my career (years before the pandemic) has been remote work. I find in office work painfully slow. I pair program quite often remote, and when someone gets stuck we also "just talk". Honestly I prefer screen sharing to leaning over someone's shoulder (much easier to doing supporting work in parallel).

I find it really depends on the type of org though. Large corporate places do tend to suffer from remote work because so much of the work is performative anyway. Remote small companies and startups the velocity is very high, but you do need more senior people capable of independent work.

Especially when you factor in the easy of "after hours" work, the amount of emergency stuff I've shipped around midnight is incomparable to the 'in office' equivalent.

Though I suspect the key word here is "my 2 programmers", I find managers don't feel like their doing work unless they're physically watching it get done.

Not understanding how to run a remote team is not the same as remote teams not being effective in principle.

alexjplant 5 hours ago|||
> I know its unpopular to say, but when I have my 2 programmers in office, we get sooo much more done than at home. Someone gets stuck and we don't message/call, we just talk.

The technology exists to "just talk" in high-definition audio and video. If somebody isn't asking for help when they're stuck that's a people problem, not a remote work problem. There are several possible reasons for their avoidance; if multiple people are exhibiting the same behavior it could be cultural (specific to your workplace, not the person's upbringing). Using physical presence to force their hand is curing the symptom, not the underlying cause.

butILoveLife 5 hours ago||
But it gets solved when we are in-person.

We could develop new technology, research culture solutions... or... meet in-person.

eikenberry 1 hour ago|||
But it introduces a whole new set of problems for your employees... but not for you, so you don't care.
roadside_picnic 3 hours ago||||
> develop new technology, research culture solutions.

The technology and culture solutions have existed and been evolving for 20 years. It really sounds like your experience with remote work is not representative.

butILoveLife 2 hours ago||
Given basically 100% of companies ended remote work, its probably the majority experience.
Daishiman 2 hours ago||
The number of remote companies is enormous but they're not loud about it.
a456463 4 hours ago|||
you can just send "hey you got 5 mins"? you have to do that in person. you do that on chat. nothing different. this is a made up reason. I do this all day, everyday
butILoveLife 3 hours ago|||
I'm the manager. They do not send that message. They either are trying and never giving up, or... doing dishes.

I check in, and it ends up being story time about non-issues.

In person, its a 'hows it going?' and they say either 'good, still working' or 'stuck...'.

I would love if WFH was as effective. I could reduce my labor costs and probably have happier workers.

dg08 1 hour ago|||
You're getting a lot of replies from other ICs that do well in a WFH setting, but I can say from a manager perspective, it's not always the manager or process. I've been managing remote teams for years since before covid and some people just don't do well without the in-person structure.

It's possible to build a high performing remote team, but it's not easy.

hephaes7us 1 hour ago||||
You could reduce your labor costs and reduce the aggravation you are causing teammates if you changed your attitude.

It's possible to drive results and create a culture of accountability without dragging people into the room with you just so you can interrupt their work in-person.

conception 2 hours ago|||
Considering it’s very easy to send a how’s it going Slack message or whatever this seems more like a issue of keeping the conversation on task than a slack issue
asdff 2 hours ago|||
Why take weekends off? Why take nights off? There are probably teams in some basement in china out working you right now. Don't you want a worker that can commit fully to your product? Have you measured hit to output from producing and rearing offspring? Those are jobs for the broodmares not engineers! Specialize specialize specialize!
starkparker 3 hours ago|||
> if you want to justify WFH, introverted-like people do not get the same level of benefit as extroverted-like people in this situation

I'm introverted and did just fine in an office, because the company culture was that coworkers all talked to each other about how they preferred to work (preferably no more often than once a quarter) and then respected that. When we moved to WFH during lockdown, that practice continued.

I've also WFH at remote-first companies that did not practice, encourage, or enforce ICs communicating to find and document better ways to work together, and have not been served remotely as well by the result.

lossyalgo 5 hours ago|||
So you're saying we should only put extroverted people in the office and introverted people get to WFH? ;)
butILoveLife 4 hours ago||
Honestly... maybe... I've thought about this.

But I also am a bit reluctant to hire introverts for this specific (entry level) job. They will not ask for help to their and my detriment.

Being a bit casual and not making grand claims: I should hire Senior introverts and have them WFH. I should hire entry level extroverts and have them in person.

a456463 4 hours ago|||
so you are accepting that you discriminate and acknowledging the in office unfavorably favors extroverts which is what everyone in this thread has been saying.
apercu 4 hours ago|||
That's not a global issue though - I have people who I have worked with for years, we're highly productive and we've never met in person.

Especially these days where it's soooo easy to chat, video call, share screens, etc.

butILoveLife 4 hours ago||
But would you be more productive in person? I am just describing my experience. In a 4 hour block, people will ask a dozen questions in-person. WFH, I'm lucky to get a single phone call despite begging them to call to ask questions.
moooo99 3 hours ago|||
I entered the workforce during covid, underwent a return to office mandate only to get a new job that is fully WFH.

I am easily twice as productive in my own hive than I am in the office. The office is full of distractions, noise, it is not as ergonomic as my setup at home and i get to waste 90min a day commuting.

In some very specific instances i see value in going to the office, productivity during everyday work is not among them

butILoveLife 2 hours ago||
I know what you mean. I'm not sure why my office doesnt have distractions. We take breaks, but its not like when I was at a fortune 20 company where I'd spend an hour drinking coffee and catching up with people in other departments.

If I had to guess, we are such a small office that its obvious if someone is distracted and I can nudge them back to work.

Saying all of this outloud, you are making me realize I have the office style of a panopticon. At least my workers seem to genuinely like working.

Plasmoid 4 hours ago||||
I'm not sure that counting "How it's going?" as a productivity stat is the win you think it is.
butILoveLife 2 hours ago||
When they say 'stuck...' and we fix a problem, I'd count that as a win.
vaginaphobic 3 hours ago|||
[dead]
idiotsecant 5 hours ago||
Sounds like your problem is that management hasn't provided the right tools to be productive.
butILoveLife 5 hours ago||
[flagged]
a456463 4 hours ago||
Sounds like a yes and you don't know how to manage.
bilsbie 4 hours ago||
My friend actually drives more when we switched to wfh. 10 miles to gym and back. 20-30 miles in misc errands and grocery shopping. Yoga class, kids sports.
Apocryphon 4 hours ago|
Do they live in an exurb
nobodyandproud 4 hours ago||
A better and more accurate title: “4-day week, WFH roll-outs in Asia to solve fuel crisis caused by Iran War”.
ex-aws-dude 4 hours ago||
The government of asia rolled it out?
blondie9x 2 hours ago||
We consume 101 million barrels of oil per day. The amount of oil humans consume per day has doubled since 1980. Is this the way we finally wake up to the urgency of addressing the climate crisis caused by burning fossil fuels?
gherkinnn 2 hours ago|
To some, being independent of a finite and politically unstable resource like oil is woke.

It was abundantly clear that one of Iran's methods would be to shut down the Strait of Hormuz.

Sadly, there are people in charge who think the former and ignored the latter.

realo 4 hours ago||
"Asia" is about 60% of the total world population.

I just hope they don't hold a grudge.

cmiles8 4 hours ago||
Terrible headline. “Asia” isn’t a thing apart from a region on a map. These are separate countries doing their own thing.

Equally annoying is when folks say “Asian” as an ethnicity. That’s glossing over a whole bunch of different countries that have relatively little to do with each other apart from being in the same general area on the planet.

karel-3d 2 hours ago||
Thank you Donald Trump for reducing our dependency on fossil fuels!
glitchc 5 hours ago|
Does this mean that President Trump is the (unexpected) champion of the remote working crowd? Not the hero we need but the hero we deserve, and all that.
yellow_lead 5 hours ago||
I love WFH but I'd also rather we not blow up schools.
Tostino 5 hours ago||
And all he had to do was make it too expensive to even travel to your usual working location.

Truly the hero we deserve.

More comments...