Top
Best
New

Posted by mustaphah 3 hours ago

Reversing memory loss via gut-brain communication(med.stanford.edu)
101 points | 24 comments
inanutshellus 1 hour ago|
Everyone's "poo-pooing" the article because the title doesn't mention mice, but, FWIW, stories of gut biota affecting humans behavior have been documented for a while.

Memory gain is noteworthy, which is the article's "wow" factor, but everyone's just knee-jerk smirking so ... here's a few random articles to gross you out about the wild world of trading microbiota and, for better or worse, changing your personality:

  * "My butt made me crave candy."[1]
  * "Gee, I'm not bipolar anymore thanks to my husband's butt juice infusion."[2]
Crazy, right?

   [1] https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-behavioral-microbiome/202404/hacking-an-individuals-personality-through-their-gut-contents

   [2] https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-28/faecal-microbiota-transplant-credited-with-curing-bipolar/105541522
hbcondo714 1 hour ago||
I would recommend the site https://gutbrainaxistherapeutics.com for learning more about Microbiota Transplant Therapy (MTT) and its opportunities, especially for Autism and Pitt-Hopkins Syndrome.
jimkleiber 38 minutes ago|||
There was a South Park episode about this years ago where everyone was trying to get it from Tom Brady.
1shooner 1 hour ago||
This seems to be a recent anti-science meme to dismiss studies that use mouse models. I'm sure there is an interesting line of discussion about the strengths and limits of those models, but that's probably a complex, nuanced thread to pull, not something you blow off with a hand-waving internet comment.
inanutshellus 1 hour ago|||
To some degree the other posts are just pointing out the misleading "assumed protagonist" of the title (which doesn't mention mice) but I was surprised to see that the majority of posts boiled down to "eek! mice!"
znpy 18 minutes ago|||
I bet it started with people trying to 1-up other commenters via the usual “achtually…” and then proceeding with the “in mice” notice.
mustaphah 1 hour ago||
Yeah, it's a mouse study, but there are tons of human studies backing the whole gut-brain connection. There are even a bunch of books on it [1][2].

What's really cool is that the paper used low-dose capsaicin (just 5 μg/kg injected), and it completely restored hippocampal FOS activity and memory in older mice. Basically, that's the same stuff you get in cayenne pepper supplements - pretty easy to get your hands on.

[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/28837738-the-mind-gut-co...

[2] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35210457-the-psychobioti...

seethishat 1 hour ago||
IMO people should eat more fiber. A lot more fiber. It cleans the gut, the liver, absorbs cholesterol, slows insulin response and makes you feel full longer. The microbes in our guts need it to function.

Rather than jumping from one fad diet to another, just eat what you like and be sure to get a lot of fiber each day.

jstanley 49 minutes ago||
> eat what you like and be sure to get a lot of fiber each day

Sure sounds like another fad diet.

nomel 46 minutes ago|||
The charitable interpretation is "just eat more fiber, regardless of the rest"
vablings 22 minutes ago|||
This has been the recommendation for general health for as long as I have been alive. Fiber is really important and there are plenty of easy healthy options that are cheap, unlike the astroturfed beef checkoff primal diet
memonkey 46 minutes ago||
The post is about a scientific study and your response is your opinion with nothing else to back it up?
igleria 38 minutes ago||
they IMO are trying to help by giving good ideas to keep a healthy gut. Add that to the study and at least to me, it´s a nice idea.

btw people, do drink water to keep up with the fiber. Otherwise it might not help.

nothrowaways 16 minutes ago||
> They showed that colonizing the guts of young mice with this bacterial species inhibited their performance on the object recognition and maze escape tasks, and that this deficit correlated with a reduction of activity in the hippocampus.
riazrizvi 28 minutes ago||
Great info. This is one of those things that it is much faster for an individual to take into their own hands to prove out, rather than waiting for the system to provide us with an answer. Too many decision makers who are unlikely to all be aligned with our own individual interests.
dharmatech 13 minutes ago||
The book

"Why Isn't My Brain Working?"

by Datis Kharrazian

published in 2014 talked about this over a decade ago.

steve1977 2 hours ago||
[flagged]
j45 2 hours ago|
in mice is clearly in the subhead.

The connection between gut-brain has been studied in humans, as well as the effect of diet and gut bacteria on brain functions.

vidarh 2 hours ago||
And in this case it sounds like the pathway to determining if this has an effect in humans as well might be relatively short given there is a pool of patients receiving vagus nerve stimulation for other things that might provide data.
j45 1 hour ago||
Vagus Nerve treatments also exist as well and are highly observable.
fnord77 2 hours ago||
... in mice. So if any of this held in humans, I think you'd see reversal of old-age memory problems in people treated with antibiotics that kill Parabacteroides goldsteinii.

As far as I know, no such effect has been observed.

And this article claims inflamation from that strain, the NIH claims otherwise: "Parabacteroides goldsteinii is a next-generation probiotic gut bacterium with significant anti-inflammatory and metabolic benefits, often reduced in obese or diseased states. "

vidarh 1 hour ago|
It's possible the specifics are different but that the overall idea still could work for humans. It seems worth at least exploring.
theusus 2 hours ago||
Mice mice mice. Tell me when you test on humans
maxall4 2 hours ago|
I smell bad data. This sounds too good to be true and most studies of this kind have turned out to be false a few years down the line.

Edit: one of many examples: https://www.science.org/content/article/journal-retracts-inf...

IshKebab 48 minutes ago|
It doesn't seem to link to any data at all so we can't check, but I wouldn't be entirely surprised if they used the "standard" P=0.05.

I think for something this unexpected you'd want a much lower P.