Top
Best
New

Posted by medhir 8 hours ago

Your phone is an entire computer(medhir.com)
227 points | 229 commentspage 5
paxys 6 hours ago|
Desktop computers being as open as they are is an anomaly. It only came to be because the systems originated from research labs and hacker cultures rather than rent-seeking corporations. And even though corporations (like IBM and Microsoft) did push them, there was a lot more emphasis on business rather than consumer use at the time.

Vendors keep them open today only because there is a historical exception, but make no mistake if the laptop computer was first introduced to the masses in 2008 you would be downloading apps through official stores and paying a 30% fee on all transactions and would only be able to do a tiny fraction of what is possible on them today.

To me the surprise isn't that the phone is locked down, but that Apple allows MacBook Neo to do so much. Just look at its iPad counterpart.

JellyPlan 3 hours ago||
I would love to have more control over my watch. I can't sort by recent apps or have a custom watch face? Really?
hinkley 7 hours ago||
Isn’t my Apple Watch faster than a Cray 1?
2OEH8eoCRo0 7 hours ago||
> I'm bothered, as I have been since the original iPad introduction 16 years ago, by the unnecessary restrictions placed by corporate powers to run third-party software and operating systems on devices we own.

It's not unnecessary, they do it because they make money as gatekeeper.

MBCook 7 hours ago||
There are other reasons.

A big factor in the success of the iPad and maybe just some degree the iPhone, but especially the iPad, is that it’s “unbreakable”. All out restrictions mean it’s computer people don’t worry will suddenly stop working because they clicked to the wrong link. It won’t get a weird virus from their email.

That is a serious upside for a lot of consumers.

quikoa 7 hours ago|||
They could allow unlocking the phone by burying that option deep in the settings with scary warnings etc. Most people could use the device with the restrictions. The fact that this is not possible at all is greed.
joemi 6 hours ago|||
If they did that, every influencer would make youtube videos and tik toks telling people how they should enable that setting to make their phone better or more powerful "for free", and everyone would just do it, especially the people who really shouldn't because they don't know any better.
AstroBen 5 hours ago|||
> everyone would just do it

Wouldn't it be better to solve that with education? Also MacOS gives you a warning when you're opening something not vetted by them.

The idea that it's some higher authorities responsibility to keep us safe quickly slides into losing freedoms we care about.

Would you also like all websites to be ISP-approved?

We could also have all social media filtered through LLM guards to keep us safe?

Maybe link our IDs to our online identity to protect our kids.

joemi 2 hours ago||
MacOS does more than just give you a warning when you're opening a program not vetted by them -- it prevents you from opening it, so that's not really a good example of education, and is in fact an example of lockdown.

I'm not arguing that anything get any more locked down than it already is, so your points (while possibly valid in a bigger discussion) don't make a lot of sense here in this discussion about a hypothetical "unlock phone" setting.

MBCook 5 hours ago|||
Yep. Scammers have managed to get people to install profiles on their devices so they can run non-appstore approved scam apps.
etchalon 7 hours ago|||
One of the first things help desk scammers do is convince people to turn off antivirus and/or Windows Defender on their computers.
AstroBen 7 hours ago||||
You can still have that. Make unbreakable the default, and add an "admin mode" toggle.
joemi 6 hours ago|||
As I noted here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47369155 that wouldn't stop the people that need the protection.
MBCook 6 hours ago|||
The last 25 years of Apple has made it pretty clear that’s not “the Apple way”.

Yeah they could. They could do a lot of things people constantly ask about, like upgradable RAM. But there is no reason to think they will.

crooked-v 7 hours ago|||
I feel like that same reason is why you see a lot of seriously tech-savvy people try to use iPads as laptop substitutes over and over even though they're obviously still not suitable for it for technical tasks. There's a lot of latent appeal in "okay, what if I just didn't have to worry about any of that ambient technical crap?".
crooked-v 7 hours ago|||
Just wanting to be a gatekeeper doesn't cover measures like SIP that don't make them anything and presumably took immense man-hours to implement.

I think the more accurate view would be an intersection of some of the company wanting to make money off gatekeeping and some of the company wanting to make quality devices that stay functional and malware-free even after you give to a deeply gullible grandparent for a while, and the former using the latter as a transparent excuse much of the time.

bitwize 7 hours ago||
It's also because U.S. carriers don't like people hooking up arbitrary devices that can run arbitrary software to their network. In the civilized world, you have a device that talks GSM/LTE, you're golden as long as you don't violate any transmission laws. But in the USA carriers are still doing device allowlisting because I guess they want to bin QoS and don't want pro-grade traffic going over consumer accounts, nor the added expense of support for consumer accounts with exotic hardware that "might" break the network.
omegadynamics 7 hours ago||
Wow everything computer
fmajid 7 hours ago||
Android now has a desktop mode (as Samsung has supported for years with Dex), and it also works on degoogled variants like GrapheneOS.
atomics423 5 hours ago||
I wish I could use my iPhone with a broken display as a MAC. I was going to fix it, but it cost me $400 to replace it, so it's lying useless.
etchalon 7 hours ago||
Some people insist there is no difference between a product and a capability and I honestly don't know to communicate to those people.
medhir 6 hours ago||
My contention is that the definition of said product and its inherent capabilities is being gatekept by a corporation that would love you to buy both an iPhone and Mac, and treat them as separate. In fact, I do have both already! But I still want rights to modify my iPhone as the computer it is.

The MacBook Neo is a great example of just how fungible these categories are, at least as far as the SoC that runs them is concerned. I paid for my iPhone in full, there is no reasonable justification for why I can’t repurpose it / modify it as I see fit.

leothetechguy 6 hours ago||
Because those people reject the principles that uphold that distinction, and so do I.
etchalon 5 hours ago||
Just out here buying furnaces and using them as grills.
shablulman 7 hours ago||
[dead]
tokenbar 7 hours ago|
[dead]