Top
Best
New

Posted by hn_acker 14 hours ago

Despite Doubts, Federal Cyber Experts Approved Microsoft Cloud Service(www.propublica.org)
439 points | 203 commentspage 5
SanjayMehta 12 hours ago|
A rigged RFP, and some very happy lobbyists, chortling into their single malt all the way to the bank.
FrustratedMonky 12 hours ago||
Is this just a case of MS needing to merge a lot of platforms, and there are gaps and overlaps.?

Maybe the critical question, are they making continuing improvements? Especially to merge conflicting functions.

Like when they bought Minecraft, or Skype. Each already had user management. Xbox was a mess. Merging them all took a lot of years.

j45 13 hours ago||
Maybe the gaps are a frature or benefit at the same time.
stainablesteel 8 hours ago||
when someone says they work at meta, they get weird looks, but no one assumes they're incompetent

when someone says they work at microsoft, they get weird looks, and people assume they're incompetent

riffic 9 hours ago||
all clouds are.
dwa3592 12 hours ago||
Exactly, and that is the moat- a pile of shit that everyone can smell from afar.
babypuncher 11 hours ago||
okay what the hell is a "cyber expert"?
alexjplant 9 hours ago|
Although "cyber" is a prefix used to denote a relationship to high technology there exist people who use it as a stand-alone term to mean "cybersecurity", e.g. "I work in cyber." It's very confusing given that it came from the word "cybernetic", the hundreds of other words that begin with it as well, and the existence of the term "cybersec" which is unambiguous and only a bit longer.
jongjong 5 hours ago||
It sucks so bad to be a software dev today. We simultaneously have to worry about:

- Market monopolies reducing options/leverage

- Outsourcing

- AI automation

- Complexity explosion

These days, every company which has money is using some horrible clunky platform/infra and we spend 99% of our time just working around limitations of those platforms; Problems which were created artificially and don't need to exist... And at the same time we're expected to meet deadlines while almost all of the challenges we face involve certain critical aspects that are totally outside of our control and require us to wait for someone else to fix stuff while we work around it with some crappy solution and we can't just switch platforms or write it from scatch (which would be easier for a lot of us) because the organization forces us to use a particular platform because of the pretext that they are SOC2 compliant. It's total BS!

Not only we have to worry about threats to our jobs, when you look at who is being rewarded in this industry; it's essentially people who create bloat/unnecessary complexity and build these horrible products.

The industry is full of horrible products that everyone uses. There is no incentive for software engineers to be competent because look at what the market rewards!

This in turn affects organization politics; everyone who has some leverage over the platforms is (at least subconsciously) looking for ways to sabotage the tech to maximize billable hours to fix it later... Fixing the platform is their bread and butter so of course they never want to fix it completely. Anyone who tries to do the right thing runs into issues with managers for missing deadlines which they have ZERO control over due to underlying constraints of the platforms they are forced to use. The people 'maintaining' the platforms don't have deadlines do they? They can keep making money from the shit they produce by ensuring they stay shitty and ensuring that the people who actually have deadlines and actually try to get stuff done can't meet them!

fredgrott 12 hours ago||
its as funny as the IA research reports from DORA dev which all seem to be sponsored AI provider ads instead....
Arubis 11 hours ago|
I mean, they also bought the F-35.
More comments...