Top
Best
New

Posted by speckx 4 days ago

I quit editing photos(jamesbaker.uk)
89 points | 128 commentspage 3
rusticflare 11 hours ago|
Original author here! Thank you speckx for sharing.

I’m not a professional photographer, I just wanted to write about where I’m at with a hobby I’ve had for ~15 years.

I love using a camera, I don’t love editing at a computer. So now I’m choosing digital cameras that have decent editing options in-camera. It’s comparable to choosing the roll in your film camera.

If there are any questions, I may get around to answering them. (No promises.)

kylehotchkiss 11 hours ago|
Hey James! I made the same choice 5 years back. Fujifilm XPro3 and now X-H2. I've been enjoying photography so much more knowing I don't need to stare at Lightroom for hours after a day out. I also use my iPad (photos app, USB-C UHS-II reader, albums strategy) to do all my culling now, and couldn't be happier.
rpgbr 17 hours ago||
I mostly try Apple Photos’ “magic” editing. It’s hit and miss, but when it hits, the photo gets way better. When not, I adjust a couple sliders (contrast, brightness, saturation). In both cases, only when I’ll use the photo. Otherwise, editing tools will be there for when (and if) I need them.
alexalx666 17 hours ago|
I had the same experience, I mostly import b/w photos after editing in Capture One, the magic stick raises brightness, sometimes adds sepia. Most of the time these edits improve the photo. I always check proposed edits for newly imported photos that I think look dull in Photos.app grid
rr808 17 hours ago||
Me too, I figured I spent more time on the computer than taking pics. Now I shoot jpg and if I have some spare time I go out and shoot. If I take a good pic I share it with basic editing if any instead of waiting to get it "perfect".
sanitycheck 17 hours ago||
I'll be sticking with Lightroom 6 (non-subscription) and the old cameras it supports, until the sad but inevitable day I can no longer run it.

I don't find editing takes much time, because I now have so many custom presets I can apply on import or in bulk that do 90% of the work.

What does take ages is picking out the best shots, but really the only way to make that quicker is to take fewer photos. Which I suppose shooting film actually does force you to do. (But so would a 2GB SD card.)

zecg 17 hours ago||
This FLOSS RAW editor works really well, btw: http://www.rawtherapee.com/
nozzlegear 17 hours ago||
That URL and product name have a real expertsexchange thing going on that's a bit unfortunate.
graemep 17 hours ago||
I agree, but giving up editing photos rather than using a different editor seems bizarre though.
Topgamer7 17 hours ago|||
I tried rt, but it was really slow. I typically am taking pub league sports photos. So I try to get through them fast. Dark table really scratched the itch there.

There are some bugs, like batched styles seem to be... order dependent. But its been suiting my needs for a few years.

dobladov 17 hours ago||
There's also RapidRAW https://github.com/CyberTimon/RapidRAW
10729287 16 hours ago||
Thanks for the link, this is exactly what I'm looking for as i've never been able to work with cataloguers like Lightroom or iTunes.
Copernicron 17 hours ago||
It works well provided your needs are simple. I rely on a lot of features in LR that simply don't exist in any open source tool. Even a lot of closed source ones lack them. As much as I would like to move to something else I'm kind of stuck.
999900000999 16 hours ago||
Film is cool up until you waste 60$ on film and development to get blank rolls.

I have a very cheap mirrorless camera that I've taken around the world.

I accidentally dropped it, it bounced and was fine.

As for editing, I generally use mobile Lightroom to tweak lighting and that's it.

Their is a camera conundrum. What good is a camera so expensive you're afraid to use it ?

rickdg 17 hours ago||
I just use Pixelmator Pro for a quick workflow. There's a nice feedback loop between taking the shot and editing it later.
calebm 17 hours ago|
Pixelmator Pro is great and affordable.
notcodingtoday 16 hours ago||
I also went this route once I concluded that I enjoy the process of taking photos (getting the 'composition right') rather than editing. I've never heard of Camp Snap until now, looks interesting!
weezing 9 hours ago|
I just use Rawtherapee. No need to pay Adobe and no need to ditch editing completely.
More comments...