Top
Best
New

Posted by WhyNotHugo 9 hours ago

404 Deno CEO not found(dbushell.com)
238 points | 171 commentspage 4
arikrahman 4 hours ago|
Anthropic's acquisition might prove for the better if their able to avoid the same layoff situation.
hollowturtle 6 hours ago||
I had the feeling something wasn't going well as soon as the AI pivoting. My guess was that for Ryan being acquired like Bun was might have been the only road available
jeremyscanvic 7 hours ago||
Like other commenters the tone of this post threw me off but I was really impressed by the design of the website. Congrats for building it, it shows your hard work and taste!
jklmnopqrstuvw 4 hours ago||
I think the only real perk of Bun/Deno over Node is that they can run .ts directly and have better ES compatibility. I don’t need Deno’s permission system, but it’s on by default, so I went with Bun.
postepowanieadm 8 hours ago||
I'm afraid something like that could happen to bun.
progx 7 hours ago|
Anthropic acquired Bun, so money should not be a problem for the next couple of years.
shimman 7 hours ago|||
Anthropic, the company that actually has much worse revenues and likely mislead the public? [1] That Anthropic? The same Anthropic that has taken billions of gulf state money where the countries are on the verge of divesting itself from the US or fear of potentially losing their refineries + oil fields for at least 50 years? That same Anthropic?

This house of cards is about to collapse and lot of "smart" devs are going to act shocked when the water recedes.

The same thing always happens: companies "adopt" open source then, unless you have monopoly, money problems eventually appear and leadership sees this lovely team with "bloated budget" in the bylines.

[1] https://www.reuters.com/commentary/breakingviews/anthropic-g...

NewsaHackO 6 hours ago|||
I hate it when people use commentary articles as fake sources for their points. It's even more aggravating when the "journalists" are making points that play to the ignorance and outrage of the reader, as they know those readers are the easiest to bait for clicks and mislead. For instance, how is Anthropic claiming that its total revenue since January 2025 as $5 billion contradict that its expected run-rate revenue for the year 2026 is $19 billion?
apgwoz 3 hours ago||
> Anthropic claiming that its total revenue since January 2025 as $5 billion contradict that its expected run-rate revenue for the year 2026 is $19 billion?

Isn’t the “exceeding $5BN” comment a lifetime revenue? … on $30BN (edit: previously said spent) raised (or something ridiculous.)

A lot of the commentary on the frontier model companies is based on how much money they’ve spent to the relatively small amount they’ve made in return, and the skepticism, especially given almost continuous reporting, that deploying AI in a variety of situations doesn’t seem to yield favorable business outcomes. OpenAI shifting to enterprise / coding type stuff this week seems, also, potentially informative. Is Gen AI actually useful for anything but code? Signs keep pointing to no… and even then, we’re in the early stages of figuring out how to build without destroying everything… something Amazon just recognized as possible with their recent shopping outage.

NewsaHackO 2 hours ago||
> on $30BN spent (or something ridiculous.)

Where did you get that figure? The filing says 10 billion has been spent on training and serving customers.

apgwoz 1 hour ago||
Whoops! Not spent, raised.
luckydata 6 hours ago|||
the sky is falling...
verdverm 7 hours ago|||
It also means the Bun team is no longer in control. Acquisition has a similar time frame and we've seen numerous projects chart a similar path to irrelevance.
furyofantares 7 hours ago||
> I wanted to know if the hundreds of hours I’d spent mastering Deno was a sunk cost. Do I continue building for the runtime, or go back to Node?

I assume the author is aware that Ryan Dahl created that too?

Not that it would make him immune to criticism, but the author comes off extremely petty.

hluska 3 hours ago||
This is an absolutely horrible article. From totally over the top comparisons to an absolute lack of substance, this is no more than a collection of ‘haha me smart’ garbage mixed with personal attacks.

Drunk sports fans are more coherent than this.

0x1ceb00da 7 hours ago||
They should call the next js runtime "done"
verdverm 6 hours ago|
I have migrated away from NextJS for similar reasons of being too special case in the ecosystem. Next in particular is designed for the way Vercel runs applications and comes with extra pain if you don't run on edge. (see middleware as an example, I think they renamed it since I left)
Lord_Zero 7 hours ago||
Does any of this transfer over to Bun as well?
egeozcan 7 hours ago||
Bun is pragmatic, extremely fast and self-contained. Ryan Dahl is a hero of mine but Deno could be neither of those, which is a shame, but to answer your question, no, not much of these can be said for Bun.
pjmlp 7 hours ago|||
Definitely, as it depends on where Zig goes, and what Antrophic will make out of it.
imeron 7 hours ago|||
I honestly can't think of a single practical scenario where I'd pick Deno over Node + npm today. Bun, on the other hand, has pretty much claimed the performance crown for itself at this point.
verdverm 7 hours ago||
For me yes, I have never found these alternative runtimes appealing.

However Anthropic owns Bun now, so a different story will unfold.

IshKebab 6 hours ago|
I really hope this is premature because Deno is easily the best thing to happen to the JS/TS ecosystem in years.

I agree with all the comments saying this is unnecessarily critical. We're getting an amazing tool totally for free. Quit complaining.

I would not be surprised if they get bought by one of the big AI players anyway, given the weird purchases of Bun and Astral.

More comments...