Top
Best
New

Posted by smartmic 23 hours ago

Do Not Turn Child Protection into Internet Access Control(news.dyne.org)
791 points | 412 commentspage 5
einpoklum 21 hours ago|
But the whole point of bringing up child protection was to restrict Internet access, to police Internet content and to legitimize mass surveillance.

Or do we really believe that states which condone support, fund and sometimes engage in the mass killings children are motivated by genuine moral concern for the young?

-----

Still, there is somewhat of a silver lining: Perhaps this will encourage young people, and people who value their privacy, to avoid those "social networks" in favor of places where there is no age verification, 2FA with a physical phone number, etc. etc.

mk89 11 hours ago||
They are doing crazy things to not do the one single thing that had to be done years ago - make Facebook, Instagram and Co. pay hard for the damage they brought on our kids and society. 90% of the crap our kids are exposed to comes from there. Not sure what's left to tackle, once you remove these websites from the picture - videogames? News??

Oh right, the kids...

ModernMech 9 hours ago||
100% of the time they want to “protect children” it’s never about that, because if it were, they would do something also to feed them and prevent them from being shot by guns. If the same people pushing for age verifications for all children are not also pushing to feed all hungry children, then I simply do not trust them, at all.
k33n 19 hours ago||
We had a good run when the internet was a disruptive force. But mass adoption of anything always leads to where we are. The internet is an established institution. The wild west days are over. If you're looking for that vibe, p2p technology in small corners will be where you can find it.
varispeed 21 hours ago||
The people who want to control internet access use children to achieve their means. Why these creeps get to power? Normally people thinking too much about children would be casted out of society at best.
mrcwinn 16 hours ago||
This happening and it can’t be stopped. There is bipartisan consensus, so hard to come by otherwise, because both parties share the same corporate interests. Deal with it.
dzogchen 21 hours ago||
Am I the only one that simply disregards everything that follows an AI slop image?
tzs 19 hours ago|
Is there something wrong in particular with that image? The composition fits in well with the content of the article, and the art seems pretty well down. I'm only seeing one error that would make me think "a human probably didn't draw this" and took a while to notice that.
dzogchen 5 hours ago||
It is just awful and the entire composition does not make sense. Why is there a globe in the sky? Why is the text ‘open access’ there which is a completely different topic?

No thought or skill went into that image besides the prompt that the author wrote in 10 seconds. It signals that the author probably didn’t put any effort in the article as well.

mamami 20 hours ago||
You don't understand, the children need to be exposed to Nick Fuentes, Andrew Tate, and algorithmically generated suicidal ideation from Facebook. It's crucial for their development, actually
ginko 20 hours ago||
Just ban children from using the internet.
funnybookbinder 16 hours ago|
ban porn altogether
More comments...