Top
Best
New

Posted by mikeocool 5 hours ago

Goodbye to Sora(twitter.com)
https://xcancel.com/soraofficialapp/status/20365327959847158...

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/openai-sh..., https://archive.ph/ABkeI

372 points | 297 comments
johnfn 6 minutes ago|
As someone who generally liked the products that OpenAI puts out, I think Sora was their first product that I really didn't like. I liked GPT primarily because I felt like it respected me: I never felt like it was trying to distract me from my work or get me to waste time doomscrolling. It's primary value proposition to keep me using it wasn't to trick me with addictive content, but to get me high quality answers as fast as possible. And I felt like OpenAI's other products, like Deep Research, agent mode, etc, were the same way. Even Atlas, although I suspect it will be equally ill-fated, attempts to follow this same pattern. It really felt like OpenAI was separating themselves from the common popular apps like Tiktok, Reddit, Instagram, etc, which seemed to exist entirely to distract me from things I care about and waste my time.

Sora was the first product OpenAI shipped where I felt that fell into that second category, and for that I was very disappointed. You have all those GPUs, and the most incredible technology in the world, and the most brilliant engineers, and all you can think to do with them is to make an app that just makes meme videos? I mean, c'mon!

Still, I am mystified by how rapidly Sora went from launch to shutdown. Does anyone have any guess what happened there? Even if Sora wasn't a spectacular success, it seems to me like subsequent model improvements could have moved the needle - shutting it down so soon seems premature.

vermilingua 40 minutes ago||
Good riddence to bad trash. To me, this idea represents the absolute worst of the AI wave (out of a lot to choose from): a corporate controlled endless stream of the feelies to keep people plugged in and scrolling for nobody’s benefit except those in control of the output. If “entertainment” can be produced algorithmically to a volume and level of quality that the masses find attractive, it’s only a matter of time before bad (worse?) actors take control of it to start highly targeted campaigns of influence, far worse than what we’ve already seen.
meken 2 hours ago||
I had so much fun making videos with my mom when it came out. During the first two weeks, we made over 100 cameo videos together - we were constantly running up against the upload limit. It unleashed tons of genuine creativity, joy, and laughter from us.

After those first two weeks though, we just… didn’t use it again. The novelty wore off and there wasn’t anything really to bring us back. That was the real downfall of Sora.

mathattack 1 hour ago||
This is consistent with a lot of AI apps. I fell in love with Gamma and haven’t used it in forever. Same with NotebookLM.
wholinator2 1 hour ago|||
I somewhat consistently use notebookLM for podcasts of academic papers I'm reading in my PhD. You have to go read it yourself afterwards but it makes better use of time in the gym or doing dishes/groceries.
qnleigh 26 minutes ago|||
I've found notebookLM summaries to be too high-level and oversimplified to be useful. Hopefully in a few years they can go deeper.
p4coder 28 minutes ago||||
I also like doing that for topics that I am tangentially interested in. One minor thing that I find annoying is that the narrators switch roles in the middle of conversation. They start with the female voice explaining a concept to the male voice and suddenly they switch. In the meantime I have identified myself with the voice being explained to.
SecretDreams 41 minutes ago||||
> You have to go read it yourself afterwards

Or before! Either is mandatory to actually learn the content.

shimman 1 hour ago|||
Just listen to actual audio books... literally doing double the work for no benefit... why?
blharr 57 minutes ago|||
There aren't a lot of highly technical audiobooks or ones that give the same specificity that would be the same as an academic paper
arthurcolle 46 minutes ago|||
Writing a book takes like 2-3 years on average. Papers are published everyday. Having a cute two-person "conversational chat" w/ audio works for a lot of people vs. just reading a paper. "No benefit" to you perhaps. Don't generalize the lived experience.
conartist6 53 minutes ago|||
Yeah it's not just the hardware depreciating, it's the social impact of what the model can do
yabutlivnWoods 19 minutes ago|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_treadmill

24/7 titillation is boring

bibimsz 48 minutes ago|||
i had fun making videos with ur mom too
ares623 44 minutes ago|||
probably one of the few human commenters remaining here
dhon_ 33 minutes ago||
Cue a flood of crass jokes as the bots attempt to prove their humanity
jklein11 46 minutes ago||||
noice
whateveracct 32 minutes ago|||
A lot of AI hype is parlor tricks
1bpp 2 hours ago||
[flagged]
dang 1 hour ago|||
Please don't cross into personal attack. Your comment would be fine without the swipe at the end.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Waterluvian 1 hour ago||||
I think you’re fumbling on an important distinction.

Sometimes people want to paint, sometimes people want a painting.

To have wonderful time with their mom… I bet they had absolutely zero interest in the act and process of making silly videos.

dqv 1 hour ago|||
Totally. This wasn't a situation where a stranger was slopping another stranger, it was a mother and son doing something fun together.
apsurd 1 hour ago|||
I get your point but it goes too far in the opposite direction. We should now discuss absolutely nothing in relation to Sora and genAI videos? That seems overly charitable to the platform.
Waterluvian 1 hour ago||
Here, let me try this approach:

Read the main comment out loud to yourself while imagining it’s someone sitting at a table at a pub.

Now imagine someone turning to this person in the pub, and speaking the subsequent comment, word for word.

No seriously, try it out.

apsurd 1 hour ago||
Agreed. I did try this out! So the reply to the original comment is dumb. I actually dismissed it for being flippant.

Your reply is more interesting. Hence my (albeit maybe snarky) chiming in. So the original comment does end at a very specific app/sora related conclusion. "Sora didn't keep us coming back."

If I may amend your scenario: imagine this bar is actually in the center of SF or across the street from Open-AI or whatever. We're on HN discussing a post on X about Sora.

The appeal to humanity is not wrong. My point is more let's keep the connection with that humanity in relation to AI, to Sora, to what's going on in this forum.

jcims 1 hour ago||||
Come on now...'We're curing cancer, right?!'

You didn't at least puff a little ack through your nostrils for that one?

nomoreusernames 1 hour ago||||
[dead]
monero-xmr 1 hour ago||||
[dead]
CamelCaseName 1 minute ago||
The owner of @Sora on twitter must be really regretting turning down the $20MM buyout offer for the handle!
AlexAplin 2 hours ago||
Notably, this primer on Sora safeguards was published only yesterday: https://openai.com/index/creating-with-sora-safely/

Not a great look that either the teams responsible for Sora didn't know this was coming or the decision was so brash that things changed overnight.

janalsncm 10 minutes ago||
There is a link at the top of that document that takes you to the original version which was published last September. As far as I can tell it’s mostly the same as before.
paxys 2 hours ago|||
The app isn’t shutting down today, so they may have decided that the write up is still useful.
repeekad 2 hours ago||
More likely the team who put a lot of work into it were unaware of the decision to kill the product, regardless of the final sunset date, until today.
janalsncm 13 minutes ago||
The document seems to be an updated version of something written last September. From a quick glance it’s not really a major overhaul.
bibimsz 2 hours ago||
i guess the disney deal falling through was the impetus rather than vice versa
bandrami 50 minutes ago|||
Though at this point it's not clear that anybody who's agreed to give OpenAI money is actually going to do so
blackflame7000 2 hours ago|||
[dead]
ex-aws-dude 3 hours ago||
The thing that didn't make sense with this app: who would ever want to scroll only AI generated videos over a combined feed?

In practice people would just generate the videos with the app then post them on regular social media in which case OAI would not get the ad revenue for that

Its the age-old "your product is just a subset of another product"

topherPedersen 11 seconds ago||
I never used Sora to watch content, but there was a guy on TikTok that used to post these great Sora generated videos that I really liked. Honestly, I was kind of surprised to hear that they were shutting this app down today.
danso 2 hours ago|||
I've always suspected video-gen is basically a loss leader for OpenAI, Gemini, and Grok. They can't convince the general population that AI is world-changing trillion dollar tech with "vibe coding", but realistic fake videos are impressive at a glance, and might convince many non-technical people that AI/LLMs are something revolutionary.
makingstuffs 47 minutes ago|||
I think of them all Gemini has the most viable use case when Veo is paired with their advertising platform. It does genuinely open the door to a lot of cost saving for promo shots of products etc
oro44 2 hours ago|||
Most of this “AI” stuff is dead on arrival.

Most People do not care about the technology and frankly they don’t want to know about it. They want great experiences. That’s it.

Technologists seem to have a reallyyyy hard time getting it.

sethops1 9 minutes ago|||
This is what I see, outside the HN bubble. If you work retail or weld pipes together or whatever, AI is of no use to you. On the contrary, if tech thought leaders are to be believed, you'll be out of a job soon, replaced by a lifeless robot. Fuck that.
bandrami 48 minutes ago|||
There's only one highly monetizable use for AI video generation but unfortunately it's fake revenge porn. You'll know the whole thing is about to collapse when the frontier models break that glass (as OpenAI is already preparing to do with sexting).
Frost1x 14 minutes ago|||
Why does it need to be revenge porn? Pretty sure regular old porn has a large market there where people can specify what they idealistically want to see vs trying to find it, if it exists.

Not every place has LEGO incest porn… or whatever the kids are into these days.

bandrami 9 minutes ago||
I'm not deeply immersed in the AI porn space but here's what I see from the ads when I surf without a blocker:

1. There's an AI-based virtual girlfriend industry that mixes text and images

2. There's an AI-based virtual boyfriend industry that is essentially all text (and not always distinguishable from the normal chat models)

3. There's a much shadier AI-based "undress this specific woman" industry

coderenegade 22 minutes ago|||
I for one can't wait for ChatGPT-style sexting to become a thing.

It's not just dirty talk. It's a whole new paradigm in verbal filth.

On the topic of sora, though: current models are astounding. I watched a clip of Leonidas, Aragorn, William Wallace, Gandalf etc. all casually riding into a generic medieval town together, and if you showed that to me a few years ago, it would have seemed like magic. We're not far off from concerts featuring only dead artists, and all video and image testimony becoming unreliable. Maybe Sora was a victim of timing or mismanagement, because I don't see how this isn't still a seismic shift in the entertainment industry.

bandrami 13 minutes ago||
I mean, you just outlined why it won't be a seismic shift: the only way the videos reliably stay on-model is if that model violates someone's copyright. And then when the movie is made the output itself isn't copyrightable (the ultimate arrangement may be but no individual frame is).
NoPicklez 59 minutes ago|||
Posting the videos to social media wasn't its only use case.

I've no doubt that content creators outside of social media were using it as well, either for their brand or other video work.

Yes we see AI reels all over the place, but that's not only what it was used for

anukin 2 hours ago|||
Moltbook was recently acquired by meta. I think it’s the same hypothesis for TikTok for ai agents or similar.
echelon 3 hours ago|||
> The thing that didn't make sense with this app: who would ever want to scroll only AI generated videos over a combined feed?

It was legitimately fun until the IP guardrails came up and we couldn't do anything with the characters and culture we know.

If you look at US top videos on YouTube any given day, 40-60% of the videos are IP-based. Star Wars, Nintendo, Marvel, music, etc.

tantalor 3 hours ago|||
> look at US top videos on YouTube any given day

I'd rather eat poison

toss1 23 minutes ago|||
Indeed!!

If you consider how the reading, audio, and video you consume either builds or degrades your capabilities and character, as the food or poison you consume either builds or degrades your physical health, then [looking at US top videos on YouTube any given day] literally IS taking poison for your mind.

Depending on the poison and the dosage, eating the poison for your body instead may be the lesser of the two evils.

echelon 3 hours ago|||
We can have that discussion, or we can have the more interesting discussion of just how much big corporate intellectual property, franchises, and brands have their hooks in pop culture.

Big IP is strong arming OpenAI, Suno, and all the rest.

It'll be interesting to see whether creators at the bottom of the pyramid can effectively create new brands and IPs at a fast enough rate to displace the lack of being able to use corporate IP.

I also think the lawyers at the MPAA, RIAA, gaming industry, etc. will ultimately require all of social media to install VLMs to detect if their properties are being posted. Forget generation - that's hard to squash - they'll go directly to Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and Reddit and force them to obtain licenses to their characters and music. We'll see cable TV era "blackouts" when a social network has to renegotiate their IP license.

People really wanted to use Sora for about a week. After the app/model debuted, they lost the ability to generate IP within the first week. The interest faded almost immediately. The same thing happened with Seedance 2.0.

People want to generate IP.

edit: clarity

no_wizard 50 minutes ago|||
Personally I’m glad that big IP came in and smashed the AI companies like this. They been relentlessly ripping off smaller creators for some time now.

It opens the precedent for those creators to now also hold these companies responsible. That’s not a bad thing under the current legal system in this way.

Also, seeing genuine original creations created with AI assistance is much more interesting to me

oorza 28 minutes ago||
> Also, seeing genuine original creations created with AI assistance is much more interesting to me

The great disappointment about how all of this is marketed is what AI should be good at doing - enhancing a tiny budget - is all but forgotten. I don't want a video of Pikachu fighting Doctor Strange, I want some weirdos fantastical horror movie that he could never get financed, but was able to green screen and use AI to generate everything. I don't want a goofy top 40 country song full of silly lyrics, I want musicians to use AI to generate new sounds as part of composition.

In the same way that there's a difference between vibe coding and using a coding assistant...

array_key_first 1 hour ago||||
Pop culture is a fickle beast. What is pop culture is community made, not corporate made, and it can't be bought and sold like traditional markets. It's one of the few areas of life where nobodies can become somebody, and corporations hate this.

Media like YouTube isn't consolidating because that's what people want, it's because that's what YouTube and IP holders want. They want death to people like Boxxy, and they want you to watch VEVO instead.

jrflowers 2 hours ago|||
> People wanted to use Sora for about a week. Then they lost the ability to generate IP.

Or the novelty wore off in about a week, and then after that it also became harder to generate videos of baby yoda at Westboro Baptist Church protests

praisewhitey 2 hours ago|||
>If you look at US top videos on YouTube any given day, 40-60% of the videos are IP-based. Star Wars, Nintendo, Marvel, music, etc.

Where can I get this data?

GorbachevyChase 18 minutes ago|||
A theme I have noticed in content oriented towards young children is a very heavy use of probably unlicensed depictions of famous characters from popular franchises. Is Nintendo collecting a royalty from “it’s raining tacos“? Probably not.
ipaddr 38 minutes ago||||
Top videos are Mr Beast and other youtube personalities.
jinushaun 23 minutes ago||
Only because they promote it. The default experience for a new user on Youtube is to show you content from creators with 5M+ subscribers. It’s a positive feedback loop.

I find all of it lame and cringe, so I downvote all of that. However stuff still sneaks by…

echelon 2 hours ago|||
Hm, turns out they removed these last year:

https://variety.com/2025/digital/news/youtube-trending-page-...

Bummer. It used to be at:

https://www.youtube.com/feed/trending

So last year, these were the top videos:

https://web.archive.org/web/20250324155132/https://www.youtu...

There's this, but it's nowhere near as good as seeing the actual videos:

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?gprop=youtube

chromacity 3 hours ago||
> The thing that didn't make sense with this app: who would ever want to scroll only AI generated videos over a combined feed?

It's not an exaggeration to say that this is how millions of people use Facebook. It might be not how most HNers use it, but create a new account and you will be absolutely funneled toward prolific producers of video-based AI slop.

But the problem is that FB and Tiktok (and to a smaller extent, YT Shorts) have cornered the AI video doom scroll market, and no one really seemed to be inclined to use Sora and related models for anything more creative. Which probably made it not worth subsidizing.

bandrami 1 hour ago||
And this kills the Disney deal:

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/openai-sh...

password54321 4 hours ago||
"OpenAI’s top executives are finalizing plans for a major strategy shift to refocus the company around coding and business users" - WSJ

Coding is where the money is. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46432791#46434072

34ahgaf 1 hour ago||
It is the last narrative that some of Wall Street believes and has enough mediocre or senile coders to promote it.

That narrative will implode like Sora later this year.

skwirl 16 minutes ago|||
It is wild that people are still posting this kind of thing in 2026. Some folks really are living in a different world.
afavour 22 minutes ago||||
No, AI is truly useful in software engineering. I was a skeptic until I started using it. No, it isn’t going to solve every problem out there, but it’s a force multiplier.
SecretDreams 39 minutes ago|||
To be fair, LLMs are exceptional at coding and they very well could displace some jobs. But you'll always need people at the helm who know what they're doing too.
drdeafenshmirtz 22 minutes ago|||
Also that developers make for good early adopters for tech
k3k3 20 minutes ago|||
[dead]
MyFirstSass 4 hours ago|||
*Forcing AI devtools down everyones throat is where the money is.

Shovel selling and instruments to dismantle whats left of working class power.

bibimsz 3 hours ago|||
Software engineers have spent the last 40 years automating away other people's jobs. The discomfort only seems to start when the automation points inward.
al_borland 2 hours ago|||
I want to make people’s jobs easier and more interesting, I never want to make them redundant.

This did happen once. 3 people were laid off, I think directly based on things I said to drive the completion of some automation. That was the last time I ever measured something in man-hours to make a point. I’ll never do it again. That was over 12 years ago.

skydhash 2 hours ago||||
Haven't mechanical engineers done the same thing (steam engines, trains,...)? The whole applied science is about using knowledge to remove tediousness (and now adding it back). A lot of jobs have been removed.
bibimsz 1 hour ago||
model T factor workers are anti worker
bibimsz 3 hours ago|||
[flagged]
paxys 3 hours ago|||
How are they going to claw back the market from Anthropic though?
janalsncm 1 hour ago|||
Step 1: make a coding product which is better on cost/quality/speed. Probably need to choose two, so redirecting compute from dumb ai videos to coding makes sense.

Step 2: win back public trust by firing Sam Altman or dropping defense contracts or something else I can’t think of.

yoyohello13 1 hour ago||
Step 3: use politicians to jam Anthropic up in legal battles.
SecretDreams 38 minutes ago||
This is actually step 1
drdeafenshmirtz 21 minutes ago||||
"Clawing back" was what the Open Claw acquisition was for ;)
lossyalgo 2 hours ago|||
Imagine all the money they can save on Sora which surely cost them way more than regular LLM usage, that they can now invest into suave Superbowl ads trash-talking Claude.

I also wonder if they got the $1B from Disney? Was that even a paid for deal? Or just another "announced" deal? Every article I found doesn't mention anyone signing any paperwork - which seems to be typical of AI journalism these days. Every AI deal is supposedly inked but if you dig deeper, all you find are adjectives like proclaimed, announced, agreed upon.

GenerWork 2 hours ago||
I believe that the $1b is apparently not coming anymore because it was basically dependent upon Sora being an actual product that actual people can use, which isn't the case anymore.
olalonde 45 minutes ago||
Strange that they're prioritizing money. Doesn't seem to align with their mission... /s
yoyohello13 1 hour ago||
It’s been interesting seeing OpenAI pivot. Snapping up popular open source devs, sicking their bought and paid for politicians on their competitors.

They probably see how much Anthropic is absolutely crushing them in developer mind share (see, people who buy tokens) and want a piece.

small_model 2 hours ago|
Not good, seems like they are running out of cash and partners abandoning them. They had no real moat to be fair. Anthropic eating their lunch in enterprise and other players have cashflows from other businesses (XAI, Google)
zhoujianfu 1 hour ago||
I had a sense things may be turning against them when my accountant asked me last week if I’d like to participate in their new round ($750B premoney) with no carry. How am I suddenly blessed with such exclusive access, at no cost?!
brcmthrowaway 1 hour ago||
Are you an accredited investor?
this_user 25 minutes ago|||
They wasted their first mover advantage by focussing on what amounts to building toys for consumers like Sora instead of actually useful products that go beyond simple chat bots.

I think they are in serious trouble, especially with the size of their cash burn. Their planned IPO could easily turn out to be their WeWork moment where the bottom suddenly falls out on the valuation if they cannot make their operation look more like a real business before investors lose confidence.

k3k3 2 minutes ago||
Agreed. They are pretty close to distress IMO. This cash-injection gets them to where, an IPO? I dunno, people might be spooked by then.

Will be interesting to see.

TheOtherHobbes 1 hour ago|||
Yes, I'm reading this as a sign of strategic failure and decline.

ChatGPT is an interesting product - I like it for certain things - but after last year's PR scramble almost all the news out of OpenAI is a disappointment, with hovering hints of retrenchment.

dyauspitr 1 hour ago||
I still like it as a general search engine and everyday LLM over Gemini. Maybe I’m just used to the style.
samrus 33 minutes ago|||
I far prefer perplexity for that. The fact that it always cites its sources is great. And it has a search bar widget for android, and search bar integration for firefox so its pretty easy to use.
apsurd 1 hour ago|||
agree it's becoming my new default search engine. But it is actively getting worse in a distasteful sense:

    Want to hear the one TRICK most people forget when doing X...?
zeroonetwothree 1 hour ago|||
Yes, every response ends with that. Why did they set it up that way?
Saline9515 44 minutes ago|||
I would suggest to edit the default prompt to tell it to avoid engagement bait.
SecretDreams 37 minutes ago||
> XAI

Kind of insulting to lump google in with XAI? Like, is anyone even using XAI other than backwater government agencies?

More comments...