Top
Best
New

Posted by jrmyphlmn 1 day ago

Personal Encyclopedias(whoami.wiki)
813 points | 175 commentspage 7
lysace 13 hours ago|
I built something very broadly similar approximately 20 years ago.

Then I forgot about it. It’s not like the data is lost, but availability is. Bringing it back up is a pain. I could probably do it in a full day of work.

What I learned: Static HTML export on every change by default is a must. I don’t think HTML will cease to be easily readable in our lifetimes.

saretup 20 hours ago||
So this is why RAM prices are through the roof. (JK, this is cool)
tolerance 10 hours ago||
Disappointed because I thought this was about building a personal alternative to Wikipedia.
esafak 15 hours ago||
For longevity, which is a consideration in such a project, one might prefer something based on Markdown files, like https://github.com/Linbreux/wikmd to Mediawiki, which uses a database. Then again it does support sqlite, which is open source, so it is not a big deal.
01HNNWZ0MV43FF 16 hours ago||
> After I found out I could also link to the real Wikipedia

It's magical watching people learn about hyperlinks. Even technical people don't always seem to know the power of a string that says, "Go to this server and fetch this document". Love it

vasco 17 hours ago||
This plus messaging and you could kill Facebook
brador 18 hours ago||
You’re gonna really wish you recorded the voice of your grandma telling those tales.

Video >photo >audio >text

uyzstvqs 18 hours ago|
Take more videos, including random moments of your daily life. Just short ones are fine. Your future self will thank you.
submeta 20 hours ago||
What a lovely project! What about using a personal, family wiki to collectively edit, update family related infos, would that work? Anyone attempted something like that?
fleebee 19 hours ago||
I like my memories ephemeral and fragile. Reading AI-generated articles about my loved ones in the typical apathetic Wikipedia tone sounds like a deeply unnerving experience to me.
subpixel 16 hours ago||
That’s the direction this developer went in but I think you could also go in a more personal direction and leverage automation where it’s effective but avoid all generative text.
hejira 19 hours ago|||
Yeah, that's my feeling too. It's an impressive and interesting project, but I don't want to do that with my life. It has had its ups and downs and some things I just don't want to dive back into like that (and don't want others to read either).

The genealogy part – researching my ancestors' life – feels more useful.

danw1979 19 hours ago||
Would there be any obligation to read the bits concerning yourself ?

I see this more as a digital artifact for future generations. I would love to read all about the events in the lives of my ancestors (no matter how detached the narration) going back generations.

Imagine if you could read in detail about your parental ancestors in 1500s, what they worked as, what they liked doing, where they spent their first holiday together…

tartoran 55 minutes ago|||
There are more than 500 years from the 1500s, let's say roughly 500. That makes around 20 generations and about 2^20 = 1048576 ancestors. There are historical records that give you an idea what people similar to you if not your own ancestors were going about but details would be overwhelming to count and sift through. I welcome that details fade away and that we don't need to carry the whole baggage but just some bits that stayed. Things will take their natural course and whatever prominent will preserve if it's worthy.
hejira 14 hours ago|||
Good point! I already write some stuff down that I never intend to read myself but hope would be of some use for future generations. It's not always easy knowing what's worth recording. And sometimes really boring stuff can be interesting 100 years from now, but you wouldn't know.
Plutarco_ink 10 hours ago|
[dead]
More comments...