Posted by elithrar 1 day ago
The $5/mo gets you 10 million dynamic requests (static assets are not included in this limit, so often a single pageview will be 1 dynamic request) and that would be across the whole workers product for your account, no extra pricing for extra websites, domains, or anything else like you'd see in most "wordpress hosting"
I run all my personal sites and client sites (one of them for a fortune 500 company) in the $5/mo plan, and the only time I went over that was when a client got hammered with malicious requests (and it was like $100)
Disclaimer: I have no relationship to cloudflare, I'm just a happy customer
You can certainly run a VPS like that for cheaper, you could probably even beat the raw request numbers from those 1€ a month vps from ovh or similar. The key difference is with cloudflare your site is globally distributed by default, and you get to buy into the whole ecosystem, if you want.
The real question nobody asks: do you even really need global distribution?
But sometimes you do have clients in both sides of the atlantic and it's nice being able to cut their request times by a few hundred ms "for free". Personally, that's not the main reason I use cloudflare, but it can be handy!
must be very light, for so much traffic. any more details?
tracker.mywaifu.best:6969/announce
Running https://github.com/ckcr4lyf/kiryuu
(Disclaimer: I'm the author of kiryuu)
CPX11, so 2vCPU/2GB
Ha ha, that's really funny timing given the recent launch of Cleanroom As A Service, promising that you can licensewash other peoples' code quickly and easily: https://malus.sh/
I'm not saying they did that, but it's ironic timing.
Just not accurate. WordPress doesn't prevent this.. It's up to hosting providers to work on their infra so it can run in a serverless fashion.
For example: https://www.agiler.io
That's serverless wordpress that scales to zero.. no changes to WordPress, plugins or anything else.. just platform infra.
A "good" standard, free CMS with theming and plugin support without the issues of Wordpress is _welcome_. (And the issues are many: Licensing, trust, drama, security, and cost).
I'm guessing that a lot of cynicism here is coming from this crowd not being the target market of Wordpress in the first place? What were you recommending to non-technical friends and family who wanted a good, open source, affordable CMS to back their website? Wordpress has all the right _ideas_, but the wrong implementation.
The hard part is displacing Wordpress market share; building a community of bloggers, marketeers, agencies, web designers, and so on; creating a huge ecosystem of paid and free plugins, allowing plugin devs to commit to your marketplace and lock customers in.
Wordpress is awful. The only thing it's got going is its moat, but that's not an engineering problem, but a people problem instead.
The problem is that people misunderstand why WP was and is better than all alternatives that tried to take it's place, I have no idea either but I know that others have tried same thing as CF and failed.
I'm convinced the thing that WP did better was being the first simple and accessible blogging platform when blogging was still a thing. IIRC, the alternatives were things like Joomla or Drupal - awful behemoths for enterprise users. WordPress was a breath of fresh air compared to those, and out of the blogging scene, people started to use it for agency projects, while others published an ever-increasing number of plugins and themes. The rest is just momentum of that movement.
Like?
Other than that, it seems it might be a half decent headless CMS, if the bit of WordPress you want is its interface, and not the number of plugins and devs and not being tied to Cloudflare's infrastructure.
...the fact that CF just dumps tokens to generate some slop to compete with the single biggest web platform and casually adding a vendor lock in. It's just buzz, an inexpensive attempt to grab a valuable market share.
If you set security as a selling point for EmDash, then I am baffled. The WP lock file has 30k lines, the brand new EmDash has 16k lines, but it LESS verbose yaml. JS is the cornerstone of anti-security that WP couldn't dare to compete with. The plugin isolation is also bogus, WP plugins are insecure because they have all access to everything, but they need at least some, mostly DB, how is that even solved? Isolation does shit there.
I am not a fan of WP, but CF doesn't even try to get this right.
| "network:fetch" // ctx.http is available (host-restricted via allowedHosts)
| "network:fetch:any" // ctx.http is available (unrestricted outbound — use for user-configured URLs)
| "read:content" // ctx.content.get/list available
| "write:content" // ctx.content.create/update/delete available
| "read:media" // ctx.media.get/list available
| "write:media" // ctx.media.getUploadUrl/delete available
| "read:users" // ctx.users is available
| "email:send" // ctx.email is available (when a provider is configured)
| "email:provide" // can register email:deliver exclusive hook (transport provider)
| "email:intercept" // can register email:beforeSend / email:afterSend hooks
| "page:inject"; // can register page:fragments hook (inject scripts/styles into pages)
With WP you can find a plethora of cheap PHP hostings that offer WP preinstalled. If you need to tweak a theme - just download a .php file via FTP, tweak it and upload back.
No server management or restart is required.
One big potential benefit that EmDash has - every WP deployment is basically a honeypot.
Most WordPress sites could just be static, but WordPress has a nice editor interface, so they're not - unless you use a SSG plugin. Building that into the core workflow (which I believe Astro supports) and giving users a nice hosted editor that produces a static site would be welcome innovation.
Editing content in Strapi, once customized with CKEditor and such, is Wordpressy enough for the human Editors familiar with WP.
So far I'm loving the stack.
I guess this is our answer to the question of why Cloudflare acquired it in the first place.
You just put the comments into something like firebase/supabase etc or use one of many off the shelf solutions. Free tier is fine.
You could just do it with CGI scripts, without the external dependencies, but that isn't really static either.
I run my local theatre website by writing the posts in markdown, and then have some github actions which use Hugo to turn it in to a static site and then uploads the content to an S3 bucket. The site itself has dynamic content like within-website ticket buying from eventbrite and a contact form that sends email using an external service. It also calls in things like google analytics.
Does this still count as static? Personally I think so, Even though there are 'dynamic' elements.
IMO static refers more about how the content is served rather than saying that the content can’t be ‘dynamic’ as lots of Wordpress sites have static/non interactive content but still regenerate the html on each page load.
Performance says they’re definitely still static sites!
As do most productivity software, like MS Office, Photoshop, Apple's iWork, etc.
Imagine making a document in Word, and it looks completely different when published.
IMO most sites like that would be better to pick no-framework, vanilla or jQuery for interactivity.
I can't image average WP users would be happy to move to EmDash, only to have a constant stream of dependabot updates for Astro.
It has 55 direct (non-dev) dependencies https://www.npmjs.com/package/astro?activeTab=dependencies - while ejs has 0 and nunjucks has 3.
I'm weary of updates, maybe it's just me, but I doubt it.
https://github.com/Automattic/vip-go-mu-plugins
It must be open sourced because it's based on WordPress. I still love that.