Top
Best
New

Posted by andsoitis 3 days ago

Artemis II crew take “spectacular” image of Earth(www.bbc.com)
https://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/fd02_for-pao/
1071 points | 384 commentspage 8
delichon 3 days ago|
I object to being included in this image without a model release and demand that pixel be removed.
delecti 3 days ago||
Your comment history suggests you're in the US, so you should be pleased to learn that you weren't included. The visible landmass is northern Africa, with a smidge of the Iberian Peninsula visible.
layer8 3 days ago|||
South America is visible on the right, and it looks to me like part of North America might also be pictured close to the horizon.

Higher-resolution image: https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art002e00019...

delecti 3 days ago||
Oh, good point. I missed South America under the cloud cover. I guess the Eastern edge of the US would indeed be visible as a highly distorted smudge on the edge of the visible surface.

For a view of roughly the same half of Earth, but with less clouds, if you rotate the image clockwise by 150 degrees you get roughly this viewpoint of the earth: https://earth.google.com/web/@3.63731074,-23.1618975,-2690.7...

mtone 3 days ago||
Thanks!

There's a heading control to include rotation in link: https://earth.google.com/web/@3.63731074,-23.1618975,-2690.7...

al_borland 3 days ago||||
Thank you. I have having trouble making sense of the orientation. My first thought was misshapen Australia, but where Spain nears Africa is much different than Australia and Tasmania. Also, they forgot New Zealand... while common for maps, I would expect it to show up in a photo.
nasretdinov 3 days ago||
If they somehow manage to get another photo which features Australia without New Zealand that would be the best Apr 1st joke I've ever seen
mememememememo 3 days ago||||
Thanks I was looking for an orientation comment.
sph 3 days ago|||
Classic American thinking even from space they are the center of the world smdh
Bloating 3 days ago||
glad you accept that fact
brongondwana 3 days ago|||
Tell the world you're REALLY fat without telling the world ...
palata 3 days ago||
"Your mom is so fat she would take a whole pixel on that image"?
idiotsecant 3 days ago||
Bad news, I was across town and I do consent to my pixel being used, so you're outta luck
blondie9x 3 days ago||
[dead]
The_Goonies1985 3 days ago||
[dead]
themarogee 3 days ago||
[dead]
dritzps 2 days ago||
[dead]
crimshawz 3 days ago||
[flagged]
_adq2 3 days ago||
[flagged]
mememememememo 3 days ago|
It sure does. But this trip is real. As was Apollo.
sdfjkhdfjkdhs 1 day ago||
Nope.
damnitbuilds 3 days ago||
Anyone find the full res version of this ?

Nasa images page is useless. Government work.

matteason 3 days ago||
They're here: https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/journey-to-the-moon/

Direct link to this image: https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art002e00019...

mbauman 3 days ago|||
That version is ~~brightened significantly~~ (edit) a longer exposure; I like the darker one better.

https://www.nasa.gov/image-detail/amf-art002e000193/

Sharlin 3 days ago||
They're two separate photos, just taken at different exposure settings.
mbauman 3 days ago||
Sure enough, thanks for the correction!
damnitbuilds 7 hours ago|||
Jpeg.
sgt 3 days ago|||
I don't understand why media, such as BBC, keep uploading heavily compressed versions of photos that could be beautiful. The original has grain, sure but that's not a problem. The BBC version is horrific. Are they trying to save on bandwidth in 2026?
BHSPitMonkey 3 days ago|||
It's highly reasonable for them to limit image size/quality to whatever looks fine to 98% of their readers. They store and serve an absolute ton of ever-changing content to browsers/apps; The very small (and likely revenue-negative) contingent of highly motivated people can find the originals if the images are especially noteworthy like these.
pndy 3 days ago|||
If the content loads fast, more views are given and more data is collected.

My uBo caught 6 elements, Privacy Possum got referer headers blocked from 28 sources

Jordan-117 3 days ago||
"I cannot immediately find a photo on a website, therefore I will denigrate the agency that sent people into OUTER SPACE to make these incredible images possible."
damnitbuilds 1 day ago||
NASA spends $4 billion PER ARTEMIS FLIGHT to throw reusable engines into the sea so people with influential representatives get jobs.

It is pork barrel politics at its very worse.

NASA has a lot to be proud of. but not Artemis. And not their Artemis website.

erelong 3 days ago||
Literally a wasteful distraction from more important things
Fairburn 2 days ago|
Nothing spectacular about it. Except for the obvious degradation of our planet, there isnt anything special about it. Its just our home.