Top
Best
New

Posted by ssiddharth 12 hours ago

I won't download your app. The web version is a-ok(www.0xsid.com)
819 points | 491 commentspage 6
ryandrake 12 hours ago|
I've got an old-ish phone, so in most cases, I can't download your app even if I wanted to. You deliberately set your minimum iOS deployment version to be higher than what my phone can even install. So I have to go to your web site or just stop doing business with your ass. Just because your developers decided that developing for older phones is too hard to figure out, or it takes too much effort, and they'd rather just cut us off.
realusername 12 hours ago|
I think the blame is on Apple here, you can't support older devices even if you wanted to. (And it's the same on Android)
ryandrake 11 hours ago||
You can support older devices, but admittedly Apple does not make it super easy to find. The easy "happy path" in Xcode is to only support the most recent OS versions.
mghackerlady 11 hours ago||
iirc even then there's a minimum that xcode will still deploy to. The only way to have an app work on older versions than that is to not update it at all
devinsewell 7 hours ago||
Nah u right, it is possible to do BLE debug stuff from browser, but my tool is so fire and china keeps downloading it 200x per day i had to add that $4.99 monthly subscription wall.
moffers 12 hours ago||
It’s a little tough these days. With AI and scraping, running an open webapp/website is now more expensive than ever before. My friends and I have launched a product in the last few months and decided to focus on mobile first and wait to develop a webapp simply because we couldn’t feel we could optimize the costs of open webapp while we have so few resources.
EMM_386 11 hours ago||
How expensive can it be?

I just randomly looked at Railway and for $20 a month you get a whole lot. I've hosted many a web project (successful personal projects and enterprise projects alike) and I don't see a large barrier to entry on "hosting a website" here.

Blocking AI scrapers and crawlers is not a huge ordeal. Planning for a unicorn before just putting a product up isn't the way to go.

https://railway.com/pricing

mrweasel 11 hours ago||
> Blocking AI scrapers and crawlers is not a huge ordeal.

If you have content they want, then it is a huge ordeal. You can pay some one like CloudFlare to take care of it for you, but if you can't or won't make a deal with those types of companies, it's going to take up a significant chunk of your time.

KellyCriterion 11 hours ago||
Before AI I regularly consumed a larger international news aggregator ran by a single person.

Then with ChatGPT he had to enshittify his website with all these cloudflare capture stuff, making the site leeesssssssss fun to use; when complaining he mailed me that AI scrapers are slashing his servers

FusionX 7 hours ago||
I agree...except, I would've appreciated some self-awareness from the author. They represent a minority of the users, yet they fail to comprehend this simple fact.

For the large majority of users, phones are THE primary (if not only) device for their interaction with the internet. You can complain "them-lazy-brainrotting-GenZs" but some people don't have a choice. There are plenty of countries where a smartphone is the cheapest internet enabled device that a person can afford.

Secondly, the UX for "web browsing" on the phone is strictly worse compared to (well-made) apps. In fact, apps are the reason for the explosion in popularity of smartphones. And also the reason only android and iphone have survived the OS race (see windows phone and linux phones). So — much to my own disappointment — it does make sense for companies to treat mobile (app) users as first class citizens. You need to understand that you are not the target user anymore. And, yes it sucks.

That said, it does not justify the gradual enshittification, dark patterns and dopamine hacking that have been normalized in modern apps.

rkomorn 7 hours ago|
Are you implying with your last sentence that websites are less culpable of enshittification, dark patterns, and dopamine hacking?

Or are you including the web-based properties of "modern apps" in said apps?

dyingkneepad 9 hours ago||
I wish there was a version of this website that was simpler, more educated and that I could show to the "normies" who own business and insist on asking me to download their app (I'm looking at you, TKD school!). This one is too aimed at the cooks.
Gimpei 12 hours ago||
My gripe is how iOS allows these companies to constantly bug us to use their stupid apps. I ended up installing the NYTimes app, not because I use it, but just to shut it up. I switched to duck duck go because I was sick of being bugged to install chrome. How many times do I need to say no?
chistev 12 hours ago|
So that's how she feels about me?
Afftar 9 hours ago||
Yes, the TC is right and I completely agree, but we all know the reason for forcing users to install an app: retention, ARPU and other metrics grow for this audience, and push notifications also help with that.
robshippr 11 hours ago||
This is especially true for dev tools. Engineers already have 20 browser tabs open with dashboards, CI/CD, docs, and logs. The last thing anyone wants is another Electron app eating RAM in the background. The best tools meet you where you already are.
peterspath 12 hours ago||
I have it the other way around. I want local first app. Don’t want everything in the cloud apps.

Luckily there is choice :)

dhedberg 11 hours ago|
I take this to be mainly about cloud services that can/could just as well be used in the browser instead, and where installing the app doesn't really allow you to meaningfully use it offline anyway. It's largely orthogonal to the question of local apps vs cloud services.
cogman10 12 hours ago|
I wish PWAs were more of a thing. That is actually what I'd use instead of installing a company app.
More comments...