Top
Best
New

Posted by super256 18 hours ago

Veracrypt project update(sourceforge.net)
1125 points | 422 commentspage 5
ChrisArchitect 4 hours ago|
Update from Scott Hanselman:

> Hey I love dumping on my company as much as the next guy, because Microsoft does some dumb stuff, but sometimes it's just check emails and verify your accounts.

Not every "WTF micro$oft" moment is a slam dunk. I've emailed VeraCrypt personally and we'll get him unblocked. I've already talked to Jason at WireGuard.

Not everything is a conspiracy, sometimes it's literally paperwork.

(https://x.com/shanselman/status/2041977121686585396 https://xcancel.com/shanselman/status/2041977121686585396)

avaer 15 hours ago||
Forced software signing should be illegal.
Pay08 15 hours ago|
It's not forced, especially for normal software, you just get a popup. It's a bit of a pain to disable the requirement for drivers, though.
baobabKoodaa 13 hours ago||
I don't think you can install VeraCrypt, at least for system encryption, unless the installer is signed
Pay08 13 hours ago||
According to further up the thread, you can if you disable secureboot.
pocksuppet 10 hours ago||
And you mess with your boot.ini and ignore that half your screen is taken up by a TEST MODE banner. Buy a screen twice as big and tape over half of it, I guess.
shevy-java 15 hours ago||
This is always a problem when big mega-corporations are involved, be it Google or Microsoft. They want to control the platform.

We really need viable solutions. I have been using Linux since +21 years or so, so it does not affect me personally, but I think Linux needs to become really a LOT more accessible to normal people. And it really has not (on the desktop); all the various "improvements" on GNOME3 or KDE are basically pointless, they have not solved the underlying problem. Ideally problems should be auto-resolvable. If someone wants to use the proprietary nvidia driver, that should be a single click - on ALL Linux distributions. Instead you see some distributions have their own ad-hoc solution and other distributions have no easy solution (for simple people).

SV_BubbleTime 11 hours ago|
I will continue to suppose that the “real issue” with Linux is that the people drawn to developing it will not work well with others and continue year after year to waste time and duplication of effort on five decent, and ten thousand pointless distributions.

Whatever reason for this refusal / inability / choice to not contribute but rather re-create is on the reader to assume.

There is very little effort put into real progress as you point out. Sure, tons of work to move from x11 to Wayland, cool, only the developers give a shit… where is Office/365 that would make daily driving actually viable?

While WINE is impressive, it seems the only real progress for anything past Windows 7 is on paid versions of which there are at least three competing options.

Linux Desktop progress is slow because there it’s thousands of floundering side-projects without a goal of actually pulling normal users in.

teekert 15 hours ago||
I'm sorry, is this some sort of Windows joke that I'm too Linux to understand?
bilekas 16 hours ago||
And yet another example of companies turning actively hostile against their users.

The burden of usage/access is now solely on the customers and the feeling is that regular customers are just a nuisance to be ignored.

trowaway2 9 hours ago||
[dead]
surcap526 7 hours ago||
[dead]
ErroneousBosh 17 hours ago||
Jesus, sourceforge is still on the go?
tvbusy 16 hours ago||
I understand that most people want to move to other more modern tools, it's up to you. However, what baffled me is why the author's choice not to move is a problem? Did we pay them to move and they did not move as promised? Was there some crowd funding to move that was not fulfilled?
ErroneousBosh 9 hours ago|||
I just didn't think Sourceforge was still running. There was a mass exodus from it about 20 years ago when it became a massive ad farm that started injecting ads into people's tarballs.

It was never as good as freshmeat.net even in its heyday.

IshKebab 13 hours ago|||
> what baffled me is why the author's choice not to move is a problem?

Because Sourceforge is horrible to use and was at one point actively pushing malware? It's pretty obvious tbh.

SXX 17 hours ago|||
Might be it even not using all your code to train AI. Or at least not asking your explicit permission to do it.
JimDabell 17 hours ago|||
Not every conversation has to be a conversation about AI.
karel-3d 17 hours ago|||
sourceforge was always very scummy, I think they would definitely use the code for that if they could
mbreese 17 hours ago||
It wasn’t always scummy… but there was a definite shift after they got bought. It’s kept getting worse since then.

Then again, this was something like 20 years ago. Back then, Sourceforge was something closer to GitHub today. It was the de facto public source repository. You could even get an on-premise version, IIRC.

Actually, this is sounding a lot like GitHub these days… not sure what that means.

ErroneousBosh 9 hours ago||
As I've said elsewhere, freshmeat.net was better :-)
mbreese 9 hours ago||
For project discovery, definitely -- but not as a source code repository.

Wow, we're dating ourselves on this, but I remember when it was a big deal that SF.net added SVN support. They apparently didn't turn off CVS until 2017!

ErroneousBosh 5 hours ago||
Yeah, I remember introducing a web dev company to SVN in about oh maybe 2006. Prior to that their "version control" was a webroot full of shit like "index.php", "index.php.old", "index.php.broken", "index.ryan.donottouch.php", "indexTUESDAY.php" and so on.

Yeah no, guys, that's not what I meant. Let me just show you this real quick...

I wonder if enough of freshmeat still exists on the Wayback machine to make a clone, maybe a skin for forgejo?

Simpler times, simpler everything.

egorfine 17 hours ago|||
And unfortunately some projects exclusively use sourceforge. Which breaks some of my CI pipelines.
kome 17 hours ago||
yeah, it just works
hernanhumana 15 hours ago||
cool project
cynicalsecurity 11 hours ago|
If you use Veracrypt on Windows then you have no idea what you are doing. Windows is not safe. Use Linux only.
HackerThemAll 6 hours ago|
I would love to switch long time ago, but I make money on Windows enterprise customers, using specific Windows tools that have no reasonable Linux counterparts.

I'll throw my Windows laptop out of a (pun intended) window on the exact second I'll secure viable and sustainable income using Linux. I know it can be done, but so far it's outside of my circles.

More comments...