Kinda crazy, it really felt like Meta had the lead in LLMs, especially during the early LLaMa days. What happened for them to fall so far behind? I don’t get how LLaMa 4 was such a big train wreck and they couldn’t correct the course like Google.

Oh good, if they built a lab, I’m sure they took the time the precisely define what they mean by super intelligence? Right? …

so glad its beating all the others on bioweapons refusal. this is what i most wanted out of the latest SOTA model

Looks like a lightweight article. But memory usage went from 316MB -> 502 MB when I hit refresh. Not sure why? Any one have any ideas? Why does it need half a gig of ram in the first place?

I'm cautiously waiting for the feedback from the first users. Meta has produced a lot of great models (LLama), maybe this is a comeback... but I'm cautious, as the jump in the quality is almost too high.

Also, I think people aren't used that using such models requires meta.ai or meta ai app.

https://meta.ai/ this is where you can try it seems like the API is not publicly accessable yet. I feel they are very late to the game and do not show value to customers over other models.

I am already somewhat concerned with companies like Anthropic and especially OpenAI having personal data via chats. Typing that sort of information into a Meta AI product feels completely irresponsible. You could make some very sophisticated ads/psyop attacks with data from daily ai chats.

I doubt its better than Opus and even if it was its not worth the privacy concerns.

One word: distillation

This looks like a very interesting model and very promising, especially after llama lost so much ground recently. I hope they release the weights