Top
Best
New

Posted by playfultones 15 hours ago

Help Keep Thunderbird Alive(updates.thunderbird.net)
462 points | 328 commentspage 3
foofloobar 11 hours ago|
How much money goes into the pocket of the Mozilla CEO? How much is used to actually pay the people and to cover infrastructure costs?
jeltz 7 hours ago||
Probably nothing. It is the Firefox revenue that pays her unreasonable salary.
Hasnep 10 hours ago||
1. $0. 2. Probably close to 100%.
MoonWalk 4 hours ago||
Is there still no way to export and import your filters in Thunderbird? This is why I shunned it 20 years ago. The absurd idea that you're going to manually run around to all your computers all the time and manually set up (and maintain) mail filters should have been rejected in version 1.0.
kmoser 3 hours ago|
Filters are stored in a file which you can easily copy between computers: https://kb.mozillazine.org/Message_Filters#Export.2FImport
fishgoesblub 7 hours ago||
How many more donations until we get a functional UI like we used to have, and a system tray icon on Linux?
Panino 4 hours ago||
I recently started using Thunderbird for work which uses O365 (horrific service) for mail. I've found that 2FA with O365 to be totally unreliable no matter the client, even using the iOS app.

Does anyone use Thunderbird with Gmail and 2FA, and does it work correctly 100% of the time there?

yuters 10 hours ago||
If you want to donate, I suggest you look at the Betterbird fork: https://www.betterbird.eu/
mhb 9 hours ago||
Long shot, but I'll ask. For a while Thunderbird spam filter will work fine. Then, spontaneously, it stops working and starts showing me many which are obvious, identical junk. And after flagging them as junk, it doesn't seem to learn anything.

For when this happens, it would be nice to have an explicit (and easy) way to blacklist items. Creating new filters for each of them is too involved.

velcrovan 9 hours ago|
I hope you have spam filtering happening somewhere upstream of your local computer. Spammers are constantly adjusting to find ways around filters, and there is no way a third class open source legacy email client I going to be able to give their filter the continuous attention it needs to stay effective.
mhb 6 hours ago||
Yes. But this is not clever stuff. I'd expect the most simple-minded Bayesian filter to identify it.
latexr 12 hours ago||
If you press the browser’s back button on the donation page, they send you to a page pestering you for your email address so they can send you a reminder to donate later. Talk about a dark pattern.

Mozilla has really gone off the rails. An organisation who claims to work on behalf of the user and who makes a web browser, actively hijacking the user experience to peddle for a few dollars?

Why the heck is Thunderbird “fully funded by financial contributions from [their] users”? Where do the billions of dollars from Google go? All the stupid doomed side projects which no one asked for nor wants and are abandoned after one year?

amiga386 12 hours ago||
> Where do the billions of dollars from Google go?

They go to the Mozilla Corporation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation#Finances

The Mozilla Corporation then picks and chooses what it finances within the Mozilla Foundation. Their financial statements don't break down how they spend on software development within the Foundation, it only lists out employee salaries, specific directors' salaries and grants to outsiders... but it would seem Thunderbird doesn't get much if they're out begging.

https://stateof.mozilla.org/pdf/Mozilla%20Fdn%202024%20-%20A...

So, as an example, in 2024, it got:

- $498,218,000 from royalties (e.g. Google)

- $66,396,000 from paid services (e.g Pocket, VPN) and advertisers

- $15,782,000 from donations

And it spent:

- $290,448,000 on programmer salaries

- $163,516,000 on manager salaries

- $36,358,000 on servers, cloud, etc.

- $20,258,000 on consultants (e.g. branding consultants)

- $9,573,000 on travel

- $2,192,000 on grants and fellowships

So overall, it didn't spent that much on the stupid doomed side projects! It spent a lot more on flying managers and marketing consultants to nice soirees.

But the real question, not answered by this financial report, is how much programming labour was spent on Thunderbird, versus other Mozilla projects?

CamouflagedKiwi 11 hours ago|||
My assumption would be that it's very little, given that Thunderbird was separated out of the Mozilla Corporation to MOZLA (or whatever it's called).

On the bright side, that actually makes me a bit keener about donating to it; donating to the Mozilla Corporation seems entirely pointless given donations make up ~2.5% of their income, and less than 10% of what they spend just on manager salaries, whereas giving it to Thunderbird might actually have a positive impact.

amiga386 10 hours ago||
I'm not sure which part it is in their accounts, but their Form 990 says:

https://stateof.mozilla.org/pdf/Mozilla%20Foundation_Form_99...

> MZLA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION share of total income: $10,760,074

So they don't break it down, but around 10 million went to the corporation that runs Thunderbird and other projects (versus 658 million to the one that runs the browser)

vovavili 8 hours ago|||
>- $163,516,000 on manager salaries

>- $20,258,000 on consultants (e.g. branding consultants)

>- $9,573,000 on travel

I am very glad to be using Brave at the moment of reading this.

smarnach 9 hours ago|||
I wasn't able to reproduce the back button hijack. It never asks me for an email address, regardless of what I try.
ksk23 12 hours ago|||
Thought the same..
user3939382 12 hours ago|||
LibreWolf should have no reason to exist. It does because Mozilla’s values are largely marketing.
drekipus 12 hours ago||
I don't think it's a dark pattern. Just a common marketing thing. Not "everything that annoys me" is a dark pattern.
account42 10 hours ago|||
Most "common marketing things" are dark patterns. Being common does not make it right and we expect better than common for people who want our donations.
addandsubtract 11 hours ago|||
Stealing the function of the back button is a dark pattern.
kelvinjps10 6 hours ago||
Why mozilla doesn't approach a similar strategy with firefox? I see with thunderbid most of the recent focus is in making the product better and the raising of the funding it's focused on user donations. With Firefox the focus is not in making the product better and instead on adding useless features, and the raising of funding is focused in advertising and random quests not related to the browser
sherr 9 hours ago||
I've just donated. I use Thunderbird every day and have used it for years now. Mozilla, Firefox and Thunderbird are very important to me and my internet usage. For all the complaints (many just unwarranted in my opinion) I'm a happy user.
wolttam 4 hours ago|
I was about to donate $5 until I saw the minimum is $7 CAD. What?
More comments...