Top
Best
New

Posted by lsdmtme 20 hours ago

Anthropic downgraded cache TTL on March 6th(github.com)
462 points | 356 commentspage 5
ares623 16 hours ago||
AGI finding bugs again. Actual Guys/Gals Instead.
idrdex 5 hours ago||
[dead]
AlexSalikov 12 hours ago||
[dead]
EthanFrostHI 19 hours ago||
[dead]
GetBurnd 13 hours ago||
[dead]
bustah 8 hours ago||
This is the same pattern playing out at every AI coding tool provider. GitHub retired Opus Fast and tightened Copilot limits on April 10. Windsurf raised prices. Cursor uses credit drain. OpenAI added ads to ChatGPT.

The common thread: the subsidy era is ending. Every provider priced access below cost to capture market share, and now with 84% developer adoption and demand outpacing GPU capacity, the bill is coming due. Shorter cache TTLs, tighter rate limits, and model downgrades aren't bugs — they're the business model correcting itself.

The uncomfortable question is whether $200/month was ever a sustainable price for the amount of inference these workflows require. The answer is probably no, which means either prices go up or service goes down. We're watching the latter.

We've been tracking this across the industry: sloppish.com/rationing-followup.html

bearjaws 7 hours ago||
Then throw in the people using $10k in their token burning "gastown" and bragging on Twitter...

I haven't really hit real usage limits in the past 2 weeks, and part of me wonders if its a loud minority who all abused Claude Code, and now Anthropic has just permanently gimped their accounts.

Something like if you are in the top 5% of users, they are now giving you limits to bring you down to the average user.

arcfour 6 hours ago|||
Begone, AI spambot.
aprilthird2021 8 hours ago||
Yeah the bill is due but many big corps still haven't got most of their eng to be 10x productive with AI but they're starting to run up 2-3x their salary in real (not subsidized) AI costs. So let's see what happens
WhereIsTheTruth 15 hours ago||
Changing "regression" to "Anthropic silently downgraded" sensationalizes the story

Why the FUD?

I notice some interesting public opinion weather change since Anthropic passed OpenAI wrt revenue

subscribed 13 hours ago|
From the response in the linked issue:

>> Was there a change? Yes — March 6, intentional, part of ongoing cache optimization. You pinpointed the date correctly.

The entire issue lays out how and why it's a silent downgrade. Also silent because it just happened, without announcing.

I don't understand how is this FUD?

taf2 8 hours ago||
I don't understand who's still using anthropic? The model produces more bugs and agrees to solutions that are clearly wrong at a much higher rate then codex. Codex produces significantly better code with fewer bugs and far less oversight. with /fast on codex it's not even slower then claude and consider it implements working code more reliably you have to use it less anyway. Beside anthropic appears to be more focused on fear mongering and other types of FUD and is a more closed solution I do not understand why so many people still appear to care what anthropic does and have not already moved on? </rant>
eaf7e281 12 hours ago|
I think they changed the quantification to save computer power for their new model. This might be why the benchmark scores look good, but the real world performance is much worse. I'm wondering if they're testing the model internally and didn't find anything wrong with the new parameter.

I canceled my subscription and switched to a codex, but it's not as good. I'm tired of Anthropic changing things all the time. I use Claude because it doesn't redirect you to a different model like OpenAI does. But now it seems like both companies are doing the same thing in different way.

throwaway2027 12 hours ago|
Claude is worse, they don't tell you when your experience has degraded and don't even let you use worse models if you run out any.