Top
Best
New

Posted by mpweiher 7 hours ago

Seven countries now generate 100% of their electricity from renewable energy(www.the-independent.com)
353 points | 161 commentspage 2
mentalgear 4 hours ago|
What a great beacon of hope to consider that we are closer than we thought in the clean energy rollout ! I read somewhere, not sure though how it is assessed/how valid it is, that last year 50% world-wide came already from clean power, with countries like the UK around 50% in the middle and others like Spain far ahead.
esskay 3 hours ago|
Yeah UK's currently going through the biggest rollout of renewable energy ever, the pace is insanely high. Theres new rules to allow plug in solar coming into effect too with kits already available for renters and such.
jonatron 2 hours ago||
They announced they're thinking about amending regulations to allow plug in solar at some point. Hopefully something eventually actually gets done.
PowerElectronix 5 hours ago||
Sadly these are edge cases due to either a lot of hydro, which is terrible for the environment in most cases or having neighbors that buy the renewable and help stabilize the grid with conventional energy.

The best way to go green is still going green yourself. Get some panels, batery, inverter and go where no government wants you to go, off-grid. (And a gas generator, too, just in case...)

realo 6 hours ago||
Perovskite Tandem are the best , according to the graph.

Why is it that those are reserved for ultra-big utility companies and I cannot buy those for my home or even my balcony?

nicoburns 1 hour ago||
They're much more expensive than traditional silicon cells, they often use toxic materials (lead, cadmium, etc), and IIRC their lifespans aren't as long. Unless you have significant space constraints it's usually better just to get twice as many traditional panels.
philipkglass 6 hours ago||
At present, those tandem cells are still experimental. Nobody is manufacturing them on gigawatt scale like for other solar cell technologies.
realo 6 hours ago||
Well... if you go to the web site , they seem to welcome very large orders. Just not mine or yours.

Might be experimental and unavailable, but just for small orders? Come on ...

wpm 5 hours ago||
Time for a group buy
efitz 4 hours ago||
Mixing in geothermal and hydro really distorts the story. Although technically correct, the common usage connotation of “renewable energy “ today is “wind and solar”.
Lichtso 4 hours ago|
> the common usage connotation of “renewable energy “ today is “wind and solar”

Hydro, wind and solar. Hydro is often even more important because it runs more steadily than the other two.

Geothermal and nuclear are neither fossil nor renewable, they are their own category.

goldenarm 6 hours ago||
This article omits important context : these 7 countries have massive hydro power (+geothermal for Iceland) for very little demand.

The only countries with <100 g CO2/kWh and >10TWh/y are using nuclear. Large scale batteries are exciting for the future but need more development. The 2 biggest battery investments in the world are being made in Australia and California, yet still produce 4x the g CO2/kWh of France.

https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/5y/yearly

amarant 4 hours ago||
Honestly surprised Iceland doesn't rely more on geothermal, the entire country is a volcano! I had expected a 70-30 split in the other direction
yownie 1 hour ago|
most people from abroad do, but most of that geothermal goes to home heating and not power generation too.
saidnooneever 7 hours ago||
i love that in a lot of countries people think these other countries are in the sticks and that they are modern... (ofc depending who u talk to but im sure we all know such a person...) :) a lot of perceptions based on old world views. Love to see these countries do so well on it. There might be many problems to solve still but it provides a degree of self reliance for energy that is really important today for a country i'd think
giantg2 6 hours ago||
It's contrary to what most people think, but the later a country modernized, the better the infrastructure (generally). You basically get to skip the innovation stages where you have a hodgepodge of systems that eventually coalesce into one and all the upgrading required to bring it up to the newest standard. If you have a lower population and smaller geography, it is often easier to upgrade as well.
mpweiher 6 hours ago|||
Albania: 90% Hydropower, $12150 GDP/person

Bhutan: 99% Hydropower, $ 4700 GDP/person

Nepal: 23% Imported $ 1381 GDP/person

            rest Hydropower  (2/3 of energy: firewood etc.)
Paraguay: 100% Hydropower, $ 7990 GDP/person

Iceland: 99% Hydry/Geo, $90000 GDP/person

Ethiopia: 88% Hydropower, $ 1350 GDP/person

DR Kongo: 98% Hydropower, $ 760 GDP/person , 13% of country has electricity

Not sure how this is applicable (and in many cases: desirable) for countries that do not have significant hydropower potential or maybe want a GDP greater than $760 per person per year.

readthenotes1 6 hours ago||
Those "countries in the sticks", one report says that the DRC only has at most 20% of the households on electricity. This report says only 10% https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/democratic-r...

On the other hand, balcony solar power will be a game changer for the world, provided your neighbors won't steal the panels like they do the catalytic converters in my neighborhood.

highgency 5 hours ago||
[dead]
rs_rs_rs_rs_rs 4 hours ago||
All these industrial powerhouses like Iceland and Albania!
highgency 5 hours ago||
[dead]
khriss 3 hours ago|
[dead]
More comments...