Top
Best
New

Posted by meetpateltech 12 hours ago

Claude Design(www.anthropic.com)
Related: https://x.com/flomerboy/status/2045162321589252458 (https://xcancel.com/flomerboy/status/2045162321589252458)
852 points | 571 commentspage 3
davebren 6 hours ago|
Remember, every product they release expands the scope of their non-compete clause, and they like their lawsuits.
lmeyerov 12 hours ago||
When Anthropic's CPO left Figma's board this week, that was my first question . Oof.
SpyCoder77 9 hours ago|
Yeah, I saw that too https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/16/anthropic-cpo-leaves-figma...
andy_ppp 6 hours ago||
I think it’s clear that Anthropic are leading the industry right now and I believe it’s because they are better at using their own tools to develop software than anyone else. I suspect that trend will accelerate.
_the_inflator 10 hours ago||
Lovable was a TailwindCSS recombinator, that’s it.

Lately it is more and more ShadCN as well.

TailwindCSS is a masterpiece but ironically doesn’t really get its fare share while “Build on top of TW” frameworks make money.

TailwindCSS is the final evolution after all other frameworks always had its benefits but also massive limitations.

BEM anyone?

TW is really elegant a new paradigm in its purest sense and brilliantly executed. No wholes could be poked in it for years and the extensibility shows, how brilliant it is.

Bootstrap will always be held dearly but it was about browser quirks etc first. Important milestone but stands no chance against TW.

anonyfox 7 hours ago||
personally I went back to bootstrap when LLM vibecoding took over. 10yo old patterns and even weak model can oneshot anything blindly, at scale. react+bootstrap is kind of cheat mode for frontend dev now with zero confusions about specific classes or api version changes of selectors and what have you, this is stupid solid after all this time.

As a dev manually typing I loved tailwind for sure, with LLMs not so much, and bootstrap in particular nails it the best IME. and yeah one can customize bootstrap quickly to look however it should, just tell your frontier LLM of choice your wishes.

oaxacaoaxaca 10 hours ago||
Am I the only one who doesn't like Tailwind? The way it totally pollutes your html makes it seem like, while the benefits are impressive, they're not worth the collateral damage.
simonreiff 8 hours ago|||
Tailwind is fantastic precisely because the biggest benefit (tree-shaking to minimize the CSS that ships) massively outweighs the fact that Tailwind syntax "looks like" an anti-pattern and makes your code "look" ugly. Also, you get used to bundling your styling and JS code in one place with any component-driven framework like Next.js/React, and Tailwind works seamlessly with all of them. I guess I just prefer the benefits to the alternative, and I feel like the collateral damage of the alternative is definitely not worth trying to make front-end design code look simpler.
iknowstuff 6 hours ago||
style="color:red" is back in fashion?
Bridged7756 10 hours ago||||
It's pretty much all personal preference. You can do anything with css modules, or use any other CSS extension.

I don't ever recall hearing about the specific, tangible benefits tailwind brings. Just a loose "it's faster", or "it's easier". It just feels like one of those things, in front end development, that are just hype-driven rather than actually bringing any ostensible benefit.

conradkay 9 hours ago||||
https://htmx.org/essays/locality-of-behaviour/

I'm not a big tailwind fan, but keeping styling in a separate file feels like a net negative

AstroBen 10 hours ago||||
Yeah I'm not a huge fan of it, either. Well organized CSS is much nicer to work with. On the other hand, I'd prefer Tailwind to badly organized CSS.
enraged_camel 10 hours ago||||
You are not the only one. I also dislike it immensely. For a framework that established itself as "for developers who don't know or want to learn CSS", polluting the HTML in the manner you describe makes no sense. And no company I've worked at figured out how to prevent it from becoming a bloated, impossible-to-maintain mess.
sweetheart 10 hours ago||||
I'm in the same boat. Tailwind always seemed insane to me, even after really giving it the benefit of the doubt and trying it out. I use it now only because its so easy for the LLMs to use, so I don't need to actually interface with it at all.
Bridged7756 10 hours ago|||
Btw are you from Oaxaca? Nice to see another Mexican in here.
einrealist 5 hours ago||
Good for crunching out some prototypes, ideas and getting inspirations I guess. Two prompts - the initial one and one refinement - took about ten minutes and used up 90% of the token budget. I wonder what the real costs are. After the IPO, they will no longer be able to subsidize token costs. The question will then be whether it's still cheap enough just for prototypes, ideas and inspiration.
anonu 5 hours ago|
As long as tokens cost less than humans people will pay for them. If you're human you need to differentiate yourself bigly from what will quickly become mainstream AI slop.
einrealist 5 hours ago||
True. I didn't expect it to provide novel designs. Maybe Anthropic should find a better replacement for 'Design'.

In my example, I expected it to create UI elements for a business application / expert system. And it did fine. In fact, I believe its perfect for creating average and functional designs. Its a better way to test variations of UIs for expert systems. But I want to know what the actual costs are.

reluctant_dev 11 hours ago||
Maybe I am using it wrong but it feels much closer to Lovable than Figma. I was expecting this to feel like the two products combined. Certainly better than Lovable though, but a little disappointing.
d_silin 3 hours ago||
I tried and not impressed. Even latest and greatest LLMs still have very poor understanding of geometry and numbers.
preston-kwei 4 hours ago||
I think UI quality is going to stop being as important when anybody can just generate an "average" UI that is good enough in minutes.

Ultimately, this really just shifts the focus towards product design and ideation rather than UI design.

jmkni 12 hours ago||
Unfortunate that linking code from your computer doesn't work with Firefox

Very interesting though

m_w_ 11 hours ago|
Really interesting response to Google's Stitch - and seemingly a better alternative given some of the features shown in the video. If everything actually works at least close to how it's advertised, this'll be useful. I'm sure it's no Dieter Rams, but it wouldn't be a surprise if it's already better than many devs at design work.
More comments...