Top
Best
New

Posted by meetpateltech 6 days ago

Claude Design(www.anthropic.com)
Related: https://x.com/flomerboy/status/2045162321589252458 (https://xcancel.com/flomerboy/status/2045162321589252458)
997 points | 656 commentspage 6
raviisoccupied 6 days ago|
I am not an engineer, I can't look at code and determine if it is good, performant, or elegant. However, I can look at designs and make a judgement. I'm curious to see how Claude Design changes how I think about AI and its capabilities.
hkpack 6 days ago|
If you are not a software engineer you can judge code the same way as you can judge design while not being a designer.

It is that in one case it is obvious for you that you don’t understand what you are looking at, and in another, for some reason, it is not.

raviisoccupied 6 days ago||
>If you are not a software engineer you can judge code the same way as you can judge design while not being a designer.

Very true.

PullJosh 6 days ago||
I like their emphasis on quickly prototyping many variations of a design. That seems useful, even for experienced designers.
rvz 6 days ago|
Useful enough to replace Figma.
dclowd9901 6 days ago||
So I guess I should just give up on my dream of having a useful AI assistant for day to day "human" tasks. We're just hell bent on replacing humans in jobs.
justonepost2 6 days ago|
"human in the loop" is downstream of what nature does already

nature beckons its creatures to become whatever they must become to be useful in the greater living ecosystem (the loop)

when you can't be useful in the loop you get flushed out of existence

humans who can't be useful will also thus be buffered out of existence

dclowd9901 5 days ago||
"Useful" is an interesting term. How useful is someone who is an expert at using AI but has no computer?
tzury 6 days ago||
Anthropic’s roadmap is widely underappreciated; it is the company defining AI productivity today.
kingofbits 6 days ago||
Hmm.. i don't like prompting my way to fix pixel decisions.

Fed it my figma file to it and creating a design system. And yeah, it looks like it, but it's still wayyy off at the same time

causal 6 days ago||
Will give it a try but my experience with Claude and browser use so far is that it’s extremely lazy: it rarely notices or cares when something doesn’t look right, it needs lots of pointing out “hey you ignored that broken render” etc
sourcecodeplz 6 days ago||
Wonder how Canva were roped into this, Claude Design will just replace them from what I read?
khoury 6 days ago||
To people saying its replacing Lovable. It's still missing the ability to deploy right from the app with a backend ready to go. I'm sure it will get there tho.
stopachka 6 days ago|
Here's a 2-line prompt that gives Claude Design a backend:

```

<YOUR APP IDEA HERE>

----

To get your credentials and learn about InstantDB, fetch this URL:

https://instantdb.com/llm-rules/create-app/AGENTS.md

```

Every cURL request to AGENTS.md spins up a new backend and splices in the credentials.

I used it to build this multiplayer pelican game:

https://349b7470-3747-49e7-8ece-960a45b0b2da.claudeuserconte...

Disclaimer: I am the founder of InstantDB

khutorni 6 days ago||
Curious to see it, but the linked page says "authentication required".
mistic92 6 days ago||
This Ai will help vibe coders but won't be better than UI/UX designer with experience. We saw huge difference in our app when we have started working with one.
hmokiguess 6 days ago|
Who’s the end user for this? I struggle to relate but then again I also don’t use Figma so I may not be the target demographic

I have been doing fine just instructing Claude code to use Tailwind and reference design documents

recitedropper 6 days ago||
Seems to me like Anthropic is desperately trying to find as many product-market fits as possible before they IPO. They're reaching a chaotic weekly release cadence--each new product chockful of unclear, overlapping capability with their previous.

Combine that with the obvious hackernews manipulation that somehow gets each and every haphazard release instantly to the top, and you can see they're starting to feel some real heat.

johnfn 6 days ago|||
It’s interesting to claim that because everything they do goes to the top on hacker news that they must be in trouble. I haven’t heard that particular chain of effect before.
recitedropper 6 days ago||
Feeling some heat != in trouble. Just that the pressure cooker is turning to a higher temp.

But, I'll gladly admit that I am bias: I'm tired of seeing blatant astroturfing by a company whose main marketing tactic is to play on societal fear, while simultaneously employing safety theatre to look like the "good guys".

So take my opinion with a grain of salt :)

cruffle_duffle 6 days ago||
It could also be that this is an exciting new, fast changing technology that happens to directly overlap and significantly impact the core audience of the site. I don’t think any form of maliciousness or secret astroturfing is required at all.

This stuff has changed a ton of what it means to exist in this whole “tech space”. The entire software development lifecycle got put into a stick blender and is in the process of getting mixed up in new and unusual ways.

It’s super cool. I haven’t been this excited about our industry since way back when the universe was just starting to get onto dialup and I grabbed my very first mp3 or wrote my first shitty program in VB or when AJAX was just entering the universe.

I think a lot of people forgot how fast shit changes in this industry and how learning new things is one of the most important skills to being successful. Everything changes all the time.

This is a tech site called hacker news. Where else would something like this be constantly discussed?

nerptastic 3 days ago|||
I agree — right now it's "all eyes on AI". They are moving fast, I don't think there's some evil plan behind the scenes. They're trying to build software super-weapons, and they're trying all sorts of different things because they can iterate quickly.

Of course the articles are going to get to the top. It's all anyone is thinking about, and has been for the last few years. I keep wondering if we're going to reach some sort of inflection point where the hype starts to die down, but then another "tool" is released and everyone is convinced that this is the one that will take the jobs. It's a bit tiring, but this is the brave new world.

recitedropper 6 days ago|||
I think it's probably both in the end. Anthropic has a lot of fans, and combine that with excited employees and investors, they probably don't need to do much explicit astroturfing to reach top of HN.

But they also desperately need users (and the data those users bring) to build their products, and the people who do have the power to manipulate this site are on their team. And it does get tiring to see a new Claude feature with like 1 comment and 25 points right at the top, multiple times in the last two week. Keeping their needs in mind, it has begun to look like manipulation, even if the above effect could explain it.

I'm glad the technology foments it excitement for you. The idea that we can share intellectual processes broadly and implement them without the previously requisite skills will obviously change the world. That it could change the world for the better, excites me too.

But many of us have our excitement tampered by the messaging, the questionable ethics behind how it has been done, and the fact that a real % of the space is basically driven by eschatological thinking. And it especially annoys me that Anthropic is the company whose messaging simultaneously encourages that eschatological thinking, and preys upon the emotional reactions it creates.

I think it is increasingly clear--if you look at recent public sentiment and feel what is in the air--that they are a villain in this aspect. I don't think we want the people who believe they are building the future to be doing so both out of fear--of China--and gaining power through others' fear of what they are doing.

But villains can ultimately do good in the world, despite their villainy. Let's hope that is how it plays out.

cruffle_duffle 6 days ago||
I mean you aren’t wrong. It’s just I don’t think it requires any kind of vote manipulation to see why ai company releases hit the front page. Back in browser war days it was the same thing.
3sdfs 6 days ago|||
Correct they're trying to bamboozle the stock market.

Im looking at this product and thinking - so...? Where's the vision?

Oh there is none. Its about spraying and praying that the hype continues and feeding off analysts who don't really understand most of the firms that they spend all day studying the valuation of.

dbbk 6 days ago||
"Who's the end user for this?" obviously people who use figma
More comments...