Top
Best
New

Posted by gnabgib 6 days ago

College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work(sentinelcolorado.com)
240 points | 211 commentspage 5
pyalwin 6 days ago|
[flagged]
EverMemory 6 days ago||
[flagged]
SamHenryCliff 6 days ago||
[dead]
rvz 6 days ago||
The college instructor might as well ban calculators and use abacuses then.
sarchertech 6 days ago||
We couldn’t use graphing calculators on calculus exams. There were professors who banned calculators entirely.
tekla 5 days ago|||
I'm confused at these comments because it makes me think the commenter didn't go to college. All my classes were basically open everything except for a literal laptop. Calculators were not useful.
fl4regun 6 days ago||
at my university in math exams we were only allowed to use 1 specific model of calculator, and most of the exams were answered symbolically anyways, so the calculator usually was not helpful anyways.
llbbdd 6 days ago|
Might be an unpopular opinion in this thread, but college was made worthless for most degrees as soon as the internet got popular and silly performative shit like this is the death knell. College is about learning how to work in an industry. I'd predict an uptick in trade schools and other hands-on work like medicine, and a continuing downturn in so-called formal education for anything white-collar, programming included. Students are customers. Businesses are going to use AI going forward. No reason to waste time on this.
hackable_sand 6 days ago|
> College is about learning how to work in an industry.

Oh

llbbdd 6 days ago||
Education is a nice side effect sometimes but yeah, I don't know how you could reach any other conclusion. If you're motivated to learn for learning's sake, college is an annoying slog that you know you don't need post-millenium. I literally left college early and started making money instead of spending it, because I got tired of demonstrating to my professors that I already knew everything they were teaching and that it'd be a waste of time for me to come to class.
sarchertech 6 days ago||
Or maybe you chose to waste your time because you treated college as a way to get a piece paper instead of as the only time in your life when you are surrounded by experts who will spend an hour a week answering any questions you can think of.
llbbdd 6 days ago|||
No time wasted at all, that option is also trivially available outside of college, it's called "email". There's a whole industry in tricking new adults into believing that college is not about getting a piece of paper, it's gross, and it's avoidable. I paid off a year of unnecessary college debt in 1/4 of a year of doing real work I learned how to do in my free time. It's a trap and articles like this where colleges are working as hard they can to make education less useful prove it.
sarchertech 6 days ago||
>No wasted time

You just said that it was a waste of time. So was it or not?

> that option is also trivially available outside of college, it's called “email”.

How many experts have you cold emailed over the years and how much of their time have you taken?

llbbdd 6 days ago||
It would have been more wasted time had I continued after a single year. I went to my first year of college on the advice of my well-meaning parents who are old and like most old people thought it was still important, and yet they agreed with my decision to leave after the first year on an offer for a real six-figure job because there was nothing to learn that I hadn't or couldn't have learned on my own. At least one of my own professors also openly wondered why I was there at all.

To your second question - less than a hundred, but tens. Most people who are worth listening to publish their work and their thoughts. Email is free. Experts love to answer questions about their work, professors hate doing extra work for no extra pay. The incentives here are not confusing. How much time have I taken? Confusing question. These are real people with real passion, and they answer questions with that in mind. Professors are obligated to puke up an answer. I've gotten responses in most cases, in some I haven't. When I don't get answers it's because the targets are smart and busy. If I wanted more engagement with my random questions I'd offer money, and if I had offered money every time I'd still be below par on the money I wasted on college. If I wanted to justify it - I'd say I learned enough to validate that paying real money for another 3-6 years would have been less valuable than burning it for heat.

sarchertech 6 days ago||
> At least one of my own professors also openly wondered why I was there at all.

I think you completely misunderstood this interaction.

There are 2 possible explanations.

1. You are so smart/knowledgeable that the professor thinks you are beyond college.

2. You were acting like such an arrogant know-it-all that the professor was being sarcastic.

I’ve seen #1, but I’ve seen #2 many times.

You sound like you have a huge chip on your shoulder about not having a degree. I had the same issue at one point before I went back and finished (after working as a professional developer for a while), so I recognize it.

When I did go back, I asked questions in class, I went to office hours to ask questions, and I did research projects with professors. Some back of the envelope math says it would have costs me about twice what I got out owing if I’d paid for an equal amount of time with whatever experts I could find.

My strong suspicion based on the few posts I’ve read is that your attitude is the reason you had such poor interactions with instructors.

llbbdd 6 days ago||
I had excellent interactions with my instructors. I interacted with them like human beings and they understood that their limited time would be better spent with students who didn't have the same energy I did. Several professors, when asked, put me through an impromptu whiteboard quiz and said yeah, do your own thing. It's great that you participated in the process in your own way. In my case I asked if I could show up for the final tests and nothing else, because the intermediate work would have been useless, received permission, and passed.

Chip on my shoulder - no, and it's a silly label to begin with. Understanding that it's for other people who value the paper more than intrinsic understanding, yeah.

EDIT: I will concede in some way that I'm proud of not having a degree, and it does influence my thoughts on this topic. I've met some real idiots that do, and I don't consider it a serious differentiator.

Also looking up the thread - at my early jobs, I was surrounded by many people who were interested in educating me on any topic I could think of, because similarly we were all being paid for our time. The difference between that and school was the assumption that we were both motivated and capable.

sarchertech 5 days ago||
1. There’s already a process for testing out of general education classes. You show up, pay $50, and pass a test. You could have saved most of your first year of tuition.

2. These classes that you blew through weren’t upper level classes. They couldn’t have been because you wouldn’t have had the prereqs to take them. If you already had some knowledge of the field and didn’t need lower level classes, you could have talked to the department about testing out of some of them.

I know you didn’t walk into an upper level class on Automata theory and come up with the proofs on the spot.

No professor would in good faith tell you to go do your own thing based on what you’re describing.

If they thought you were very smart and sincere about learning, they’d encourage you to do independent study with them, do research, work with the department to move into higher level classes, or take cross listed graduate classes.

If they thought you were kinda smart, but a huge asshole, they’d tell you to go do your own thing because they didn’t want to deal with your crap.

This is all coming from experience as someone who came into school not needing the intro classes, and someone who used to be that arrogant.

balamatom 5 days ago||||
>only time in your life when you are surrounded by experts who will spend an hour a week answering any questions you can think of.

Why is that a resource of "once-in-a-lifetime" scarcity in the first place?

sarchertech 5 days ago||
Because

It’s really expensive, time consuming, and difficult to gather exports together like that.

The closest anyone comes to research university is national laboratory, or something like Bell Labs. But you’re unlikely to have access to those.

And you’re unlikely to ever have another time in your life when you can take 4 years to devote almost solely to learning.

balamatom 4 days ago||
Yes exactly, why are those things the case?
sarchertech 3 days ago||
It’s expensive because in a capitalist society experts want to be well paid.

As to why you’re unlikely to have another time in your life when you can do this, that’s also because of money. Life tends to get more expensive the older you get.

tim-projects 6 days ago|||
That doesn't work in tech based professions. In college I took music technology. It was 2 years of my own learning and explaining how everything worked to my tutor.
sarchertech 5 days ago||
If you’re talking about a purely vocational program, you’re not likely to be dealing with world class experts.