Top
Best
New

Posted by Liriel 4 days ago

GitHub's fake star economy(awesomeagents.ai)
801 points | 371 commentspage 5
LtWorf 3 days ago|
I briefly mentioned it in a talk at minidebconf a couple years ago.

Download counters are abused similarly and are even easier to inflate.

Understanding the real popularity of a project is now even harder with all the AI bots spamming about it.

nottorp 4 days ago||
Why is zero public repos a criteria?

I paid github for years to keep my repos private...

But then I don't participate in the stars "economy" anyway, I don't star and I don't count stars, so I'm probably irrellevant for this study.

Topfi 4 days ago|
Am very much the same, took a bunch private two years ago for multitude of reasons. I can, however, see why no public repos could be a partial indicator and of concern, in conjunction with sudden star growth, simply because it is hard for a person with no prior project to suddenly and publicly strike gold. Even on Youtube it is a rare treat to stumble across a well made video by a small channel and without algos to surface repos on Github in the same way, any viral success from a previously inactive account should be treated with some suspicion. Same the other way, if you never made any PR, etc. sudden engagement is a bit odd.
nottorp 4 days ago||
I think they're using it as a signal for the accounts doing the starring, not the account being starred...
simultsop 3 days ago||
We need our spokesperson to speak about this!

https://www.youtube.com/@programmersarealsohuman5909

Cider9986 4 days ago||
I hope this doesn't mean they will make it harder to create GitHub accounts. Have you ever tried to create a facebook account recently? Every time I've tried they demanded a facescan.
rvz 4 days ago||
Who ever thought that GitHub stars were a legitimate measure of a project's popularity does not understand Goodhart's Law and such metrics were easily abused, faked, gamed and manipulated.
fontain 4 days ago||
https://x.com/garrytan/status/2045404377226285538

“gstack is not a hypothetical. It’s a product with real users:

75,000+ GitHub stars in 5 weeks

14,965 unique installations (opt-in telemetry, so real number is at least 2x higher)

305,309 skill invocations recorded since January 2026

~7,000 weekly active users at peak”

GitHub stars are a meaningless metric but I don’t think a high star count necessarily indicates bought stars. I don’t think Garry is buying stars for his project.

People star things because they want to be seen as part of the in-crowd, who knows about this magical futuristic technology, not because they care to use it.

Some companies are buying stars, sure, but the methodology for identifying it in this article is bad.

eddythompson80 3 days ago||
Garry Tan is an imbecile though.
evilsocket 4 days ago||
[dead]
fr3on 3 days ago||
Stars measure attention. Packagist downloads measure automation. Neither measures trust. The only signal that's hard to fake is: does something real depend on this?
mvvl 4 days ago||
Tbh, for me there’s basically no difference between a repo with 2k stars and one with 20k.

Stars only matter when there are very few, like if it has almost none, that’s a red flag. Otherwise it’s just noise.

Silamoth 4 days ago||
Genuine question: Who uses stars on GitHub? Even if I use a library or tool, it’s never once occurred to me to give it a star on GitHub. Is this a real thing people do? And if so, why?
edm0nd 3 days ago||
I star something that I think is cool and also so I can find it easier if I forget the name of it I can just go look at my Stars and re-find it.
wazHFsRy 3 days ago||
I guess the idea is to show a small token of appreciation. I do that and I am also happy if I receive some on my own repos.
AKSF_Ackermann 4 days ago|
So, if star to fork ratio is the new signal, time to make an extra fake star tier, where the bot forks the repo, generates a commit with the cheapest LLM available and pushes that to gh, right?
ModernMech 4 days ago|
The next step after that is going to be celebrity forks -- whether top devs and/or Milla Jovovich have forked your repo.
More comments...