Top
Best
New

Posted by martinald 3 days ago

Figma's woes compound with Claude Design(martinalderson.com)
122 points | 99 commentspage 2
rcleveng 3 days ago|
I tried out claude design yesterday and I have to say, it's exactly what I thought (hoped?) Figma Make was going to be.

I didn't want yet another lovable.dev or v0 with figma make, I wanted the prompt -> figma design which I could iterate on by hand once I got something in place (and also faster route to creating the prototype in figma) to play with the UX of it.

strimoza 3 days ago||
Used Claude Design to build the landing page for my side project (strimoza.com) over the weekend. Honestly impressive for a solo dev with no design background — got something shippable in a few hours. That said, I still ended up going back to tweak things manually. It's great for 80%, the last 20% still needs judgment. Not sure it kills Figma for teams, but for indie devs it's a game changer.
lightbulbish 3 days ago||
Please change your hero font. The extra wide style hurts reading
rafram 3 days ago|||
It’s pretty hard to read on a phone, and the prose, particularly in the bullet points, has that annoying LLM-y trait of focusing way too much on implementation details ("Bunny CDN"!) rather than telling me a single reason why I'd actually want to pay for your product.
bayarearefugee 3 days ago||
> It’s pretty hard to read on a phone

Awful on desktop too, the weird squished font makes everything look like its in the wrong aspect ratio and the site is a weird combination of too noisy/busy combined with serious contrast problems between text and background colors.

Looking at this site I think human designers are going to be fine for a little while longer...

lelanthran 3 days ago|||
> Used Claude Design to build the landing page for my side project (strimoza.com) over the weekend. Honestly impressive for a solo dev with no design background

This looks like it is out of a template, though. If you need something like this, why not use a template? The font is pretty bad, though, so a template might be an improvement here.

sbarre 3 days ago|||
The other commenter went a bit hard on their critique.. to each their own, I think your design is mostly fine except for that super squished title font (that is also sadly used on buttons)..

It makes it very hard to read, and if you're counting on people scanning the page to quickly understand your offering, and then stick around, you should consider fixing that.

Choose a better proportioned font to improve readability and it will make your site instantly better and easier to understand.

I honestly thought the rendering was broken when I first loaded the page (I'm on an ultra-wide monitor) but then realized it was just like that.

jujube3 3 days ago|||
I think the LLM pranked you. Try using the --no-but-seriously flag next time.
iamsaitam 3 days ago|||
If i can be forthright, it looks like any other llm slop website design. The grain effect, the extra long FAQ, the reveal animations, the bad combination of font sizes and contrast ratios.. you're better off ripping off a website that has been actually designed by someone who understands what they are doing.
motoroco 3 days ago|||
thanks for sharing your project. how was your process different compared to pre-claude design? would you use it again?
sreekanth850 3 days ago|||
Did you checked it in mobile device?
nekooooo 3 days ago||
every single cta on your site is nearly unreadable. you need to stop drinking the kool-aid.
omega3 3 days ago||
I don't have much experience with Figma but looking at their prices I'd think that for someone who isn't doing a one off designs Claude Design would be much more expensive (especially if not on subscriptions) https://www.figma.com/pricing/
npinsker 3 days ago|
Assuming you need more than Figma's free tier, they're both $20/mo for individuals and small teams.
manofshad 3 days ago||
Isn’t a huge part of Figma the shared component libraries and design systems? It’s less about drawing UIs and more about keeping products consistent across teams within the company.
thinkindie 3 days ago||
my 2 cents - Claude is not going after EVERY single SaaS (or maybe not yet), but after those products that are adopted by individuals that are keen at experimenting new tools (software engineers, designers etc etc).

At the same time I have the feeling Claude Design is more useful to get UI context closer to Code Claude then anything (and eventually some quick prototyping), but I might be wrong.

Either way, I've been trying to upload a 95MB .fig file and I get a generic error message without any information on the issue itself (is the file too big? not the right format? Tell me!)

JumpCrisscross 3 days ago||
> takeover attempt by Adobe, that was later blocked on competition grounds

Would Figma in Adobe be a stronger competitor against Claude Design today than Figma and Adobe can be separately?

plastic041 3 days ago||
It's a little unfair to Figma when its moralless competitor is ignoring every copyright laws.
napolux 3 days ago||
I tested it yesterday. Kinda impressive, but also design output is pretty boring.
october8140 3 days ago||
I’ve tried it. It’s useless.
StrangeSound 3 days ago|
It's funny to see all of these dramatic articles coming out about Claude Design, when Google's Stitch[0] has been around for at least 6 months and no one has batted an eye. https://stitch.withgoogle.com/

I'm not sure how much of that is overhyping Claude, or Google's poor marketing of their own products.

swingboy 3 days ago|||
On an iPhone, when I scroll down a bit to the templates and start pressing the right arrow to scroll through, the templates quickly shift off-center. Not a good look.
StrangeSound 3 days ago||
Yeah it's not a great experience on mobile. On desktop it works really well.
edwinjm 3 days ago||
Don’t forget Pencil, another “Figma killer”. Free (for now). https://trypencil.com/
mmcclure 3 days ago||
I was extremely confused before realizing I think that link is for the wrong Pencil. You probably meant to reference this one: https://www.pencil.dev/
More comments...