Top
Best
New

Posted by nkurz 3 days ago

Acetaminophen vs. ibuprofen(asteriskmag.com)
696 points | 471 commentspage 7
raverbashing 2 days ago|
Honestly this article is mixing a lot of different factors

> Acetaminophen has a scarily narrow therapeutic window. The instructions on the package say it's okay to take up to four grams per day. If you take eight grams, your liver could fail and you could die.

Gee I don't know, I think this is a wide enough window to not miss it. That difference is 8 500mg pills

> that for most people in most circumstances, acetaminophen is safer than ibuprofen, provided you use it as directed. I think most doctors agree with this.

Could be but I think a lot of doctors underestimate the dangers of paracetamol as well

All of the factors the author mentions about IBP are true. But it's all about the details. Safer? Safer in which condition?

"Dehydrated" ok take a glass of water. Active bleeding? Most NSAIDs interfere with that, and no you won't become a hemophiliac by taking one Ibuprofen

Also, some countries do add a notice for kidney problems for Paracetamol as well (e.g.) https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/5164/pil

An as a conclusion, I find it "funny" that nobody considers how healty/safe it is to take paracetamol and have mild analgesia (translation - you're still in pain) and taking ibp and having better analgesia

alok-g 2 days ago||
OMG! I have been taking Dayquill/Nyquill in syrup form when having cold/cough and often without formally measuring! Will be careful from now on.
kenjackson 1 day ago||
This was a masterclass in science writing for laypeople. Going to find more from this author.
lr4444lr 1 day ago||
After reading this, I wonder whether maybe low doses of morphine over a short period are safer than either.
Mordisquitos 1 day ago|
No, even if morphine were metabolically safer (I don't know), its addictive potential would outweigh the potential safety benefit.

On the other hand, if in the early 2000s you were to share those concerns with certain doctors, they would propose a more effective and non addictive alternative to morphine instead. Only the first part of what they would tell you was true.

pazimzadeh 2 days ago||
Don’t anyone mentioning this, but alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen every 6 hours as needed works well
KnuthIsGod 2 days ago||
This is why asking for medications based on the last thing you saw on social media is a really bad idea.
chermi 1 day ago||
What about cox-2 like celoxib? Chronic pain for 15 years checking in.
pupppet 2 days ago|
If you don't make a habit of taking either, what actually performs better?
petesergeant 2 days ago||
Depends what you’re taking it for. Generally people take NSAIDs for muscle and dental pain, or anything that’s obviously inflammation, and paracetamol for anything else, particularly headaches, and is a common adjunct treatment if you have a cold or flu.
bonsai_spool 2 days ago|||
> If you don't make a habit of taking either, what actually performs better?

Tylenol/acetaminophen is good for fever which NSAIDs won't help. Otherwise, take both and alternate their dosing times for better pain coverage.

ButlerianJihad 2 days ago||
"Good for fever"? Only ignorant consumers would attempt to counteract the body's very own defenses against infection and disease.

A fever is not dangerous within normal parameters, except for being dangerous to the virus and bacteria that threaten the body. Your body runs a fever because it engages in a battle to the death with these microbes.

If you defeat the body's own defenses by lowering the fever, for example if you are a nervous mother who hates her baby's fussing, or if you're hospitalized and the nurses are laser-focused on "number go down" treatments, then you can expect to be ravaged by the contagion for much longer than expected.

Phui3ferubus 2 days ago|||
The priorities have drifted. In the middle of night I don't care about getting healthy, I need to get rid of fever, so I can fall asleep and able to got to work/school in the morning. And somehow there is never right time to be sick and everyone just want to supress syndromes here and now.
bonsai_spool 2 days ago|||
> "Good for fever"? Only ignorant consumers would attempt to counteract the body's very own defenses against infection and disease.

Yes, ignorant consumers and physicians across the world.

You can't just 'vibe medicine' or 'vibe biology' - please don't comment if you don't know what you're talking about.

imtringued 2 days ago||
Someone with a basic understanding of evolution and biology understands that evolution will take any free lunch it can get.

The vast majority of the time medicine can only ever help with (acute) symptoms and rarely the underlying cause unless it is something like vaccines or antibiotics.

Medicine has side effects because if there was a free lunch to be obtained from medicine, the human body would have synthesized the medicine directly. Hence medicine is always about making tradeoffs.

When it comes to general health, there is always a causal chain of cause -> primary symptom -> secondary symptom -> tertiary symptom -> ... and a lot of medicine tends to work on the secondary or tertiary symptom.

Pain evolved to be an accurate indicator of damage to encourage you to stop ruining your body and not a punishment.

bonsai_spool 1 day ago|||
I am forever astounded by the self-satisfaction of programmers as they talk about domains unfamiliar to them.

Just imagine someone trying to lecture a network engineer about how really async bugs should really never be different than bugs you see single-threaded if you use a semaphore. I mean, that's why we have semaphores!

Anyway, the temperatures attained during fevers are at best bacteriostatic (read not helpful in actually treating an infection that would lead you to seek medical care). If you've got evidence-based arguments, happy to counter them. Just please don't evoke 'evolution' to explain your bias-du-jour.

Evolution didn't create the personal computer or build a skyscraper. We're firmly in uncharted territory wrt things our bodies were evolved to deal with. As a great example, human temperature has been going down over time—evolution tells us that must mean we're all more susceptible to getting sick!!! https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2020/01/human-body-te...

SEMW 1 day ago|||
This is a good argument, but it has a flaw here, which is that a systemic fever during illness may still be an evolutionarily beneficial adaption on average if there are a some situations where it can be the difference between life and death, e.g. bacterial pneumonia or sepsis, but that doesn't mean it's equally useful for all types of illness.

I did a fevered research dive last time I had the flu and came to the conclusion that there wasn't really any good evidence that fever is helpful for flu, and I should have few compunctions about suppressing it. (And that most of the situations where fever is really valuable for are ones where in the modern world you should go to a hospital and in the case of a bacterial infection be given antibiotics)

SpicyLemonZest 2 days ago||
For non-habitual pain relief, combinations outperform either in isolation. Studies show a significant effect, and anecdotally for me it's often the difference between dampening and outright curing a headache. Combo pills are widely available in most countries (branded as Advil Dual Action and Motrin Dual Action in the US), but they're pretty new so consumer awareness isn't yet super high.
More comments...