Top
Best
New

Posted by FiddlerClamp 12 hours ago

Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated(techcrunch.com)
298 points | 274 commentspage 3
SwellJoe 10 hours ago|
This shit is so dark. I mean, popular music has always been pretty formulaic, and prone to imitation and trite bullshit, but at least when humans were making it, you'd occasionally get some spark of genius, real originality, even in the most mundane forms.

I use LLMs for code every day, but if I could flip a switch to turn it all off and prevent this shit from happening to the arts, I probably would.

TheMagicHorsey 10 hours ago||
Butlerian Jihad vibes are building.
mikojan 10 hours ago|||
"Probably"? I'd hit that a thousand times just to be sure.

Don't understand how one can experience anything but infinite dread when confronted with the effects of these models on the arts.

Maybe I am getting old. But I don't think so...

pesus 10 hours ago|||
If I had to guess, I'd say that it's actually more of a young person thing to want to get rid of all AI. I've only ever seen older people wearing a shirt with an AI generated image on it.

I would absolutely push that button a thousand times as well.

SwellJoe 10 hours ago|||
I mean, there are some positive uses for the technology, some will likely save lives and advance the frontier in medicine and science. The ways it's able to automate research tasks is a pretty big deal. And, even though I know that, I think with the harm it's doing to our humanity with all this slop overwhelming everything (the web is now more slop than human, YouTube and every music streaming app soon will be), it's maybe not worth it. I don't know how to balance those two things. And, I don't know how you'd regulate it to make it safe, even if we had politicians anywhere who wanted to.
Bud 9 hours ago||
[dead]
us321 10 hours ago||
Deez what?
devindotcom 11 hours ago||
however you might feel about AI generated media, flooding platforms with unlabeled slop is nothing but scammer behavior and we should take serious measures to disincentivize it for both the uploaders and service providers.

I do suspect we are in for a lot of verified-human platforms where your fee goes to supporting establishing an artist or author's humanity beyond a reasonable doubt.

ambicapter 11 hours ago||
Is it free to upload these files? Maybe a 1¢ fee would be enough to kill a majority of the spam.
saaaaaam 11 hours ago||
Effectively yes. There are plenty of music distributors that have “no fee” distribution where they simply take a percentage of any royalties.

I suspect we are going to see that model quickly go out of favour though.

TremendousJudge 11 hours ago||
really? there are ways of putting music on Spotify that don't involve paying a fee upfront at any time?
mjr00 11 hours ago|||
Yes, last I checked at least LANDR, Amuse and Tunecore all had plans where you release for free and they take a % of royalties.
saaaaaam 10 hours ago|||
Yes, lots.
hombre_fatal 11 hours ago||
What does human verification look like when you grant that it’s impossible to tell?
devindotcom 11 hours ago||
I don't grant it. if you mean it is impossible to tell from the music itself, perhaps. but there are other means of verification.
somewhatgoated 11 hours ago|||
A human can still upload tons of AI generated music though?

I don’t see how verifying that the author is a human helps in any way.

I also don’t think it’s a big problem but that’s another discussion

devindotcom 10 hours ago||
sounds like you don't really care about this honestly, so i'll reflect your apathy
somewhatgoated 3 hours ago||
why even type all that then?
hombre_fatal 11 hours ago|||
What are any reasonable examples of how you can verify a song wasn't AI-generated?

e.g. Game speedrunners film the whole process to prove they did it themselves.

Presumably you had some ideas when you envisioned "human-verified platforms".

harvey9 10 hours ago|||
Follow musicians and bands that perform live would be my choice. If they write their music with AI and I still like it then that's ok by me. Obviously this doesn't scale if you are a platform operator but that's not my situation.
devindotcom 10 hours ago|||
music can be performed live and in person. many musicians work with other musicians, labels, studios etc. a web of trust can be built and verification via performance is a compelling option. not complete but it's certainly an option.

would you as a label sign an artist you'd never seen perform? maybe there is value in a platform working under similar constraints.

hombre_fatal 10 hours ago|||
With the internet and modern platforms, we democratized music so that you can make music in your bedroom and publish it without collaborating with a record label, produces, etc. So you'd have to put some of that cat back into the bag, but for what?

I guess there could exist a Spotify that is limited to music performed live for people who like that. Or simpler: a checkbox you can click to filter it to music known to have been performed live.

But that doesn't sound like something I'd want imposed on all music on a platform. Scrolling through my SoundCloud favorites right now, less than half of them perform live at all, and a lot of it is remixes that are never performed live. And most of them are pseudonymous. I'd lose more than half of my music if the platform required music to have been performed live. A lot of music isn't even performable live.

devindotcom 10 hours ago||||
>But that doesn't sound like something I'd want imposed on all music on a platform.

that's fine. there's room for multiple platforms. personally I would pay for the thing I describe, sounds like you wouldn't. but the question is not whether you or i would, but whether enough people would to make it a viable business - whether it's the platform, or the method, or a label that licenses its music in a certain way, or what.

somewhatgoated 3 hours ago|||
maybe “platforms” themselves are a bigger problem than anything about AI.

You can just buy music from artist directly, there has never been a need to use a platform

AbraKdabra 7 hours ago||
I really don't care if it's AI, I love music and it's 100% subjective to what I like, I'm not less moral if I prefer some ones and zeroes than a real band if it pleases my ears. I created a lot of songs in Suno which I really really like and have been in my playlist for months alongside the bands I have listened for more than 30 years.
rzmmm 6 hours ago|
I agree with you, but I hope they prevent people uploading thousands of AI generated albums. If people start doing that, it can become difficult for non-AI artists to gain visibility in the recommendation systems etc.
mjr00 11 hours ago||
I wonder how much of this even matters. Sounds like it doesn't (aside from taking up space on Deezer's drives).

> The consumption of AI-generated music on the platform is still very low, at 1-3% of total streams, and 85% of these streams are detected as fraudulent and demonetized by the company.

Even pre-AI, music has always been a winners-take-most business. Per an article from 2022, the vast majority of artists have fewer than 50 monthly listeners[0], which I suspect is far lower now due to the flood of AI.

Not sure about Deezer, but for Spotify there is some kind of minimum to get you into any algorithmic rotation. People try to game this with bots, i.e. botted streams, but the problem with bots is that the accounts are bots, so the recommendations just become music for other bots, hence the part where 85% of the streams are botted. So it doesn't actually work, and you have to rely on old-fashioned promotion to get into any algorithmic playlists.

So 44% of uploads being AI-generated sounds bad, but it's extremely unlikely anyone will ever encounter them naturally, the same way that people don't naturally discover random, non-AI artists with 10 monthly listeners and tracks with less than 1000 plays. This isn't a defense of AI music slop, by the way; it's more pointing out that the "making a song" part only takes you about 20% of the way to becoming an artist people want to listen to. A harsh lesson our friends in /r/SunoAI are learning.

[0] https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/over-75-of-artists-on...

rectang 10 hours ago||
44% of uploads are probably not created by 44% of "artists". The core of people who are looking to exploit the system are going to be good at gaming the recommendation algorithm — they're specialists in it solely for the money who don't need to trouble themselves with artistic concerns.
mjr00 10 hours ago||
I'm not saying it's impossible, but at a minimum it's extremely hard to game the recommendation algorithm (primarily talking about Spotify, maybe Deezer's is less sophisticated). The best way to "game" the recommendation algorithm, to kickstart a new/less-established artist profile, is to get onto popular playlists. However these playlists either have actual quality barriers (so they won't put AI slop music on) or they take $$ (so this doesn't really work with the "mass generated AI slop" approach).
CharlesW 10 hours ago||
> …it's extremely unlikely anyone will ever encounter them naturally…

"Extremely unlikely", you say? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/nov/13/ai-music-...

mjr00 10 hours ago||
This is the very definition of unnaturally: the creators of those AI songs spent a ton of money promoting them, for whatever reason.
CharlesW 10 hours ago||
If that were true, then I agree that, "it's extremely unlikely anyone will ever encounter them naturally unless the creators spent a ton of money promoting them" would be true. But if you're on MusicTok or using any other popular music discovery channels today, you are encountering at least some AI-created music naturally even if you don't realize it.
gwern 4 hours ago||
> In addition to detecting, tagging and removing AI-generated music from recommendations, Deezer has now stopped storing hi-res versions of AI-tracks

Important point for anyone out there thinking about generating a lot of samples. Expect to get increasingly filtered out if you don't emphasize quality or uniqueness or something. It's cheaper to detect that something is generated, and apply standard base rate reasoning 'it's probably slop' and filter it out, than to try to do expensive evaluation to look for the rare gems.

cultureulterior 5 hours ago||
This is good and cool.
jnwatson 8 hours ago||
Does Deezer charge per song?

Sounds like a free backup service to me.

curvaturearth 6 hours ago||
Great reason to steer clear of deezer
anderber 8 minutes ago|
Why is that? They're being honest and reporting their numbers. Other platforms are not telling you.
graphememes 5 hours ago|
If your goal is to create something you enjoy, do not labor over the process of how you do that, try everything, be a kid again, simply lose yourself in the joy of that thing, even if it contains "using ai" it's not a bad thing, it's merely another tool, like your DAW or photoshop.

Also, lastly, have fun, be frustrated, get angry, be excited, be mad.

Making music is fun, you don't have to make the process harder.

If you want to make money, good luck.

More comments...