Top
Best
New

Posted by zorrn 1 day ago

Changes to GitHub Copilot individual plans(github.blog)
511 points | 216 commentspage 4
thecopy 1 day ago|
I have Copilot Pro+ and discovered i cannot use Opus anymore today! Are we reaching the end of VC funded productivity?
alexaholic 1 day ago|
If you’re a paying customer, it’s paying customer funded, not VC funded.
thecopy 1 day ago||
That is not necessarily true.
arjie 16 hours ago||
Oh nuts, I forgot I was on Copilot. I used to use it for auto-complete and so on. I haven't used it in over a year and I'm still paying for it. If you're like me you'll find it here: https://github.com/settings/billing/licensing

And you can then cancel it. I have no idea what a premium request is and it's all just too complicated to use.

ignoramous 10 hours ago|
> I have no idea what a premium request is and it's all just too complicated to use.

Copilot (before today) had one of the simplest & cheapest pricing on the market.

literallyroy 1 day ago||
Removing access to opus is pretty funny. At least they recognize it’s unacceptable and tell you to go get a refund.

The per-request model was pretty insane.

p1necone 1 day ago||
Damn it was good while it lasted, but it was obvious the previous per request pricing scheme was misaligned with their actual costs. MS's product people must be seriously detached from their technical and financial people for it to have even lasted this long (or they're willing to burn a lot of money for the typical "make customers happy and then rug pull" cycle, but hey, Hanlons razor).

Given that they've already silently had session + weekly rate limits for the past couple weeks already at least (I've hit them), I wonder if this change is just making them visible to the user, or if it's actually tightening them too.

If it's the former then I can say they're still significantly more generous than claude pro (on the pro+ plan), so this might be okay. If it's the latter, and the new limits are similar to claude pro then copilot is going to be significantly less useful to me.

rafaelmn 14 hours ago||
> it’s now common for a handful of requests to incur costs that exceed the plan price

Pricing per turn/request was/is an idiotic model and I'm glad they are paying for it. It just forces you into a workflow just to work around business model. Heck the best laugh would be to create a plan outside vscode with interactive CC/Codex then copy paste into GH copilot to do a single session burn of few M tokens.

Again ridiculous model.

aulin 12 hours ago|
So far they did not change it, and none of this applies to business and enterprise accounts. My idea is that it can still be viable as most businesses will have plenty minimally used licenses with just a few power users abusing the request model.
alfg 12 hours ago||
Wow, and I already prepaid for the year. Figures.
K0IN 1 day ago||
I consider migrating to claude, what a shame they dont have a github copilot plus like price tier.
swingboy 17 hours ago|
It really seems like the cheap inference is coming to a head very quickly.
polski-g 13 hours ago|
Demand is increasing exponentially but supply is increasing linearly. NIMBYs inventing datacenter lies about sucking up water or noise is going to drive prices through the roof.
duskdozer 12 hours ago||
Noise in residential area is already a huge problem and data centers do in fact make it worse. They may be able to carve out exceptions in laws or push non-enforcement, but none of this changes the impact on human health.
More comments...