Top
Best
New

Posted by speckx 9 hours ago

AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing(stephvee.ca)
329 points | 325 commentspage 4
guywithahat 8 hours ago|
I'm very skeptical of his premise. I feel like AI acceptance/resistance is dependent on what social media site you use. I believe it's antagonistic on Reddit, but sites like X are generally pretty excited for AI. Certainly in my life people are accepting and excited for AI releases and tools, maybe so long as your experience with AI isn't Microsoft enterprise copilot.
xg15 8 hours ago||
Both can be true at the same time. You can both use AI productively yourself and be concerned/horrified of the larger direction of the technology or the actors that drive it forward.
yodsanklai 8 hours ago|||
I wonder if people who weren't very good at school feel vindicated by AI, while the most successful ones are threatened.
happygoose 8 hours ago||
What's co-pilot? do you mean the Microsoft 365 Copilot App?
cdelsolar 8 hours ago||
pretty lame, Milhouse
OutOfHere 7 hours ago||
These people are dinosaurs and you know what happens to Dinosaurs. Until they meet their conclusion, they are for the moment at risk of becoming terrorists.
mjtk 8 hours ago||
AI scares the crap out of me. I worried about what reality will look like in 2-5 years. The rate of change is pretty bonkers.
IAmGraydon 6 hours ago|
What has changed for you in your life?
simianwords 8 hours ago||
Is this just Luddism in 21st century? I kind of feel bad for the pathetic (mental) state one must be in to take this kind of activism seriously
orbital-decay 8 hours ago||
Luddites were opposing the owners, not the tech.
simianwords 8 hours ago||
Who is this author opposing, pray tell me
sunrunner 7 hours ago||
I'd say it's still the owners, even if they don't explicitly say or if it's even consciously recognised. I doubt that the tool, put towards broadly positive uses that are considered beneficial and not harmful to individuals or society, would be seen in the same way.

Most fears of AI (in the 2026 sense of the term), and perhaps technology more broadly, are fears of capitalism, ownership, and control, and less about the capabilities of the thing itself.

platevoltage 8 hours ago|||
I still maintain that the biggest proponents for this tech are unable to set up a wifi router without help.
simianwords 8 hours ago||
I don't think it is because the biggest proponents are at the top - either in Science / Academia / Professional software development. But even if the people who are the weakest advocate for the tech, whats the issue?
Jtarii 8 hours ago||
I think AI is super cool and use it everyday, I also think its likely to cause extreme human suffering.

If AGI is let loose on the world I am confident millions of people are going to die.

hnav 7 hours ago|||
it doesn't need to be AGI, the way it's being let loose on the world it is already poised to hurt millions.
simianwords 8 hours ago|||
> I also think its likely to cause extreme human suffering

yeah no. thinking this way is hyperbolic and just plain wrong

morning-coffee 8 hours ago||
This is (yet another reason) why we can't have nice things on the Internet anymore. Sigh.
jonathanstrange 8 hours ago||
This is a normal reaction to ground breaking technology but these reactions never had any noteworthy effect in history. There used to be Maschinenstürmer during the 19th Century industrial revolution. There were also violent enemies of cars in the beginning of the 20th Century, some of them were even willing to kill drivers with lethal wire traps.
GolfPopper 8 hours ago||
I see a vast financial sector bubble, a flood of broken software at work, users who have incorrect expectations because they believed LLM summmaries, and a vast increase in bullshit everywhere in the public sphere; I am not seeing see the "groundbreaking technology" here. "Cheap bullshit at scale" isn't an advance, it's a disaster.

Sure, LLMs are "revolutionary". So were the Chicxulub impactor and the Toba supervolcano.

runarberg 7 hours ago||
The comparison to cars is apt given how destructive this technology has been to cities, and how dangerous it is to drivers and non-drivers alike.

But otherwise you are wrong. There has been plenty of successful resistance to technology. For example a many cities, regions, and even entire countries are nuclear free zones, where a local population successfully resisted nuclear technology. Most countries have very strict cloning regulation, to the extent that human cloning is practically unheard of despite the technology existing. And even GMO food is very limited in most countries because people have successfully resisted the technology.

Neither do I think it is normal for people to resist ground breaking technology. The internet was not resisted, neither the digital computer, not calculators. There was some resistance against telephones in some countries, but that was usually around whether to prioritize infrastructure for a competing technology like wireless telegraph.

AI is different. People genuinely hate this technology, and they have a good reason to, and they may be successful in fighting it off.

appz3 5 hours ago||
[dead]
aizl34 4 hours ago||
[dead]
inquirerGeneral 7 hours ago|
[dead]
More comments...