There are a couple of AI-esque misspellings - in the More Myth than Menace wolves image, on the right in the "at a glance" section, it reads "wolves aarely approach people," and in the Typography image the text in the top right is "Type connncts us all."

But yeah the quality is remarkable, and rather scary.

I use Nano Banana all the time and this seems like a step up

Something, something democratization. Because having a skill is inherently oppressive nowadays.

Why not?

Earlier you needed expert Photoshop skills to create fake images now anyone can do it.

It appears so!

yes

I was just wondering about that. Did they embrace it as a “signature look”? it cant be accidental, right?

Lol this is pretty funny

That has to be the wrong stock image included or something, bloody hell.

     magick image-l.webp image-r.jpg -compose difference -composite -auto-level -threshold 30% diff.png

It's practically all dark except for a few spots. It's the same image just different size compression whatever. I can't find it in any stock image search, though. Surely it could not have memorized the whole image at that fidelity. Maybe I just didn't search well enough.

This is hilarious. Seems like kind of a random image for a model to memorize, but it could be.

There is definitely enough empirical validation that shows image models retain lots of original copies in their weights, despite how much AI boosters think otherwise. That said, it is often images that end up in the training set many times, and I would think it strange for this image to do that.

Regardless, great find.

Given the recency of that image, it is unlikely it is in the training data and therefore I would go with oversight.

Wow. How did you catch this??

point delta (from 2nd) not total