Top
Best
New

Posted by wahnfrieden 2 days ago

ChatGPT Images 2.0(openai.com)
Livestream: https://openai.com/live/

System card: https://deploymentsafety.openai.com/chatgpt-images-2-0/chatg...

1036 points | 963 commentspage 7
kalx 1 day ago|
I tricked it into making a nude. That was fun.
jumploops 2 days ago||
Looks like analog clocks work well enough now, however it still struggles with left-handed people.

Overall, quite impressed with its continuity and agentic (i.e. research) features.

minimaxir 2 days ago||
Model card for the API endpoint gpt-image-2 (which may or may not reflect the output from ChatGPT Images 2): https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-image-2

API Pricing is mostly unchanged from gpt-image-1.5, the output price is slightly lower: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing

...buuuuuuuuut the price per image has changed. For a high quality image generation the 1024x1024 price has increased? That doesn't make sense that a 1024x1024 is cheaper than a 1024x1536, so assuming a typo: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/image-generati...

The submitted page is annoyingly uninformative, but from the livestream it proports the same exact features as Gemini's Nano Banana Pro. I'll run it through my tests once I figure out how to access it.

strongpigeon 2 days ago|
> That doesn't make sense that a 1024x1024 is cheaper than a 1024x1536, [...]

I think you meant more expensive, right? Because it would make sense for it to be cheaper as there are less pixels.

jbggs 22 hours ago||
just assume everyone here is making typos
esafak 2 days ago||
https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-images-2-0/
rqa129 2 days ago|
Thanks, all displayed images look horrible and artificial. This will fail like Sora.
gekoxyz 2 days ago|||
Hard disagree on this, I was coming here to comment that this is the first time I really can't tell that some of the photos are AI generated.
furyofantares 2 days ago||||
I felt the same, particularly with the diagrams / magazines anyway.

I don't think it'll fail like Sora though. gpt-image-1.5 didn't fail.

livinglist 2 days ago||||
Denial is real…
QuantumGood 2 days ago|||
Your single other comment is simplistic hyperbole as well, so this is presumably a bot account.
muyuu 2 days ago||
I wonder if this will be decent at creating sprite frame animations. So far I've had very poor results and I've had to do the unthinkable and toil it out manually.
vunderba 2 days ago||
I created this little demo of an animated sprite sheet using generative AI. It's not great, but it is passable.

https://mordenstar.com/other/hobbes-animation/

muyuu 2 days ago||
Looks good to me. Would be nice to see the process. I'm having trouble with parts of the stride when the far leg is ahead. Doing 8-directional isometric right now.
freedomben 2 days ago|||
I had exactly the same thought! I've got a game I've been wanting to build for over a decade that I recently started working on. The art is going to be very challenging however, because I lack a lot of those skills. I am really hoping the AI tools can help with that.

Is anyone doing this already who can share information on what the best models are?

gizmodo59 2 days ago||
Use the imagegen skill in codex and ask it to create sprites. It works really well.
muyuu 2 days ago|||
I didn't have great success last i tried, but i will give it another shot this week. Presumably they incorporated improvements to the skill?
freedomben 2 days ago|||
Thank you!
ZeWaka 2 days ago||
It's still bad.
cyberjunkie 2 days ago||
Looks like AI and I look away from any image generated by a LLM. It's my easy internal filter to weed out everything that isn't art.
Sargos 1 day ago||
Is this available for Codex subscription users of Open Claw without needing a separate API key?
rambojohnson 2 days ago||
Just tried it and got the usual six fingers, and half a thumb. What are they actually iterating on with these models by now…
james2doyle 2 days ago|
In the next round of ChatGPT advertisements, if they don’t use AI generated images, then that means they don’t believe in their own product right?
More comments...