Posted by dmarcos 3 days ago
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/21/business/spacex-cursor-de... (https://archive.ph/c2Tac)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-04-21/spacex-sa...
I see being downvoted on my question already - can people who hate Musk not see the difference between asking and supporting?
SpaceX has paid for contracts to deliver services to the government and those services have saved the government billions of dollars compared to the alternative.
> those services have saved the government billions of dollars compared to the alternative
Source? All I can find is some guy saying it.
And it doesn't really matter what they've saved. It doesn't excuse conflicts of interest.
Turns out capping costs help. (See SLS) (See Europa Clipper)
Contracts aren't subsidies and you know that. It's straight up dishonesty to mix them up.
McDonald's and Burger King are government contractors
And the point of conflict of interest still stands and is unargued while we still argue the meaning of "government subsidized".
"Please estimate Elon's IQ based on his timeline"
It estimated 115-130. A decision like this points to the lower end.