Top
Best
New

Posted by jjgreen 4 hours ago

Irony as Meta staff unhappy about running surveillance software on work PCs(www.theregister.com)
188 points | 124 comments
softwaredoug 1 hour ago|
This article is just a summary of other articles. Specifically these two more detailed ones:

https://www.itnews.com.au/news/meta-to-start-capturing-emplo...

https://www.businessinsider.com/meta-new-ai-tool-tracks-staf...

ramon156 1 hour ago|
> "This makes me super uncomfortable. How do we opt out?" was the top-rated comment in response to the internal announcement, according to a post on Meta's internal workplace communications site seen by Business Insider."

Have people lost their spine? seriously, quit your job. this is insane. why are americans putting up with this bullshit?

rdevilla 55 minutes ago|||
Right on. Meta employees, fuck you for building the surveillance state we live in today. You are the fucking scourge and death of the 2000s internet. Eat shit, I care not for your "privacy concerns."
cannonpr 49 minutes ago||
While I can understand the sentiment, it should be expressed with less vulgarity, and frankly, workers should show more solidarity to one another, not because of “deserving it” or not, but simply because it’s the only way out of the pit they put us in. Otherwise we are forever dragging each other back in.
rdevilla 45 minutes ago|||
I will not use the LLM's Corporate English.
63stack 41 minutes ago||||
Where was that worker's solidarity from meta employees when they to built out the surveillance network?
embedding-shape 37 minutes ago||||
> workers should show more solidarity to one another

Agree, but at one point you're also effectively betraying people who typically want to give you solidarity, especially when you're working on systems and tooling used for suppressing said solidarity. So yeah, fuck you Meta employees for completely lacking any sort of spine.

JKCalhoun 35 minutes ago||||
The vulgarity angle? It got your and my attention.

I agree with you about the solidarity though. Anyone speaking out against this shit-world we've created with the internet is welcome.

ubermonkey 36 minutes ago|||
>it should be expressed with less vulgarity,

Clutch those pearls!

xnorswap 1 hour ago||||
"Companies should be able to bully their staff, since their staff are free to quit" is not compatible with a decent society.
amiga386 57 minutes ago|||
"Companies should be able to offer massively addictive and manipulative websites, since their users are free to not look at them" is not compatible with a decent society either.
andrepd 51 minutes ago||
> since their users are free to not look at them

It's even worse when you consider that even if you were to opt out of Meta services entirely (which is not practical due to how many essential things run on e.g. whatsapp), they still build a shadow profile on you based only on data other people upload about you. So yeah, not only "just don't use it" is not a reasonable argument, it doesn't even solve anything!

mingus88 7 minutes ago|||
> which is not practical due to how many essential things run on e.g. whatsapp

Where do you live that WhatsApp is essential?

I deleted my account when Facebook bought it and I don’t feel like anything of value was lost. Between messages/sms, signal, telegram, discord, I have no shortage of places to chat.

WhatsApp only has value because of the network effect. Quit the platform and make your contacts find you elsewhere. Every platform dies eventually. The users just need to leave.

I don’t really care about the shadow profile. Meta is hardly the first to build a database of non customers, and it’s not the only such database I’m in. I avoid all Meta services and will never see an ad from them.

onemoresoop 48 minutes ago|||
Their argument: users are free not to think about it.
2ndorderthought 48 minutes ago||||
Want them to stick through a 10 year lawsuit while they get fired anyways? Do you think there is a lot of hope of winning such a lawsuit? Metas CEO hangs out at the Pentagon and has bomb bunkers. They can do whatever they want to their employees
maribozu 12 minutes ago||||
This line immediately brought various Dilbert images to my mind.
mystraline 40 minutes ago||||
In the old days, before federally recognized unions and those things, when the company/boss did something terrible....

The workers would arm up with shotguns, rifles, Molotov cocktails. They'd then go to the bosses' house and have a "chat". If they didn't listen, they'd have their house shot up or burned to the ground.

It was the very bosses that hired Pinkerton's to go murder the union leaders as well.

Some of the railroad unionization got so bloody and violent that even the US military got in on the action, in favor of companies.

In the end, we got the NLRB and a whole host of rights. The violence did indeed work, but saying that is somehow breaking unforgivable speech.

And if violence isnt up to these meta engineers, perhaps they should look into CIA's own simple sabotage field manual techniques.

vasco 1 hour ago|||
I agree and consider a lot of regulation to be useful but there are some examples of this where I think we just perpetuate bad companies into existing when they'dgo bankrupt or have to pay wild salaries to compensate being shitty. But it just doesn't seem practical to expect people to stop working for bad companies. In the country I'm from the average salary is super close to the minimum wage with low unemployment so technically employees could change easily and find another job with the same minimum wage and still people stay at bad companies. It'd be the best regulator if people quit, even unions wouldn't need to exist, under this light a union just perpetuates a bad boss, but human nature is not changing so protections are needed.
benbristow 1 hour ago||||
Have you seen the salaries Meta pay?
embedding-shape 1 hour ago|||
That's the crux. People aren't asking "Am I earning enough?" but "How can I earn more?", and it all spirals into whatever the current system could be called.
jagged-chisel 1 hour ago|||
So employees should have plenty in the bank to fall back on while they found their own companies to compete … right?
bauerd 1 hour ago||||
Health insurance and opportunity cost
everdrive 19 minutes ago||||
>Have people lost their spine? seriously, quit your job. this is insane. why are americans putting up with this bullshit?

I don't know why, but it's endemic. You have ICE, quite literally purchasing your surveillance data so they can sweep people off the streets. But getting people to delete some apps? It's effectively impossible. However you feel about the ICE issue, and future government program could deem you the enemy. And your data is out there just waiting to be weaponized against you. But will people actually do anything about it? Delete their apps? Stop using a smartphone? Write their congressman? Nope, nope, nope, and nope. They will complain online a bit and otherwise change _no_ behavior. The only positive movement I've seen in this regard is people moving away from flock. Otherwise, people are tripping over themselves to allow surveillance into their lives.

throwaway2037 15 minutes ago||||

    > why are americans putting up with this bullshit?
The answer is simple: Golden handcuffs. If you pay people enough money, they will do anything. Also, labor laws are so weak in the US that this is surely allowed. It would take a federal law (or many powerful states to all pass laws in parallel) to outlaw this behaviour. Hint: It will not happen.
Traubenfuchs 1 hour ago||||
The majority of people working at Meta will never ever again in their lives get a job offer that good. Meta knows this and doesn't care about many of them quitting. They can currently scoop up an endless supply of developers that have memorized every single leetcode hard, system design and """behavioral""" interview question.
rob74 54 minutes ago|||
Ok, so this spyware is another step in the "either they comply with what we force them to do, or they quit, whichever way, for us it's a win-win" strategy, after Return To Office? And, just to make sure the employees get the point, they concurrently announce a further 10% round of layoffs? Yeah, makes sense...
Traubenfuchs 21 minutes ago||
Nothing planned at Meta that can not be achieved with the decently competent engineers who will accept this insane surveillance and don't give a shit about whether they build weapons of mass destruction/surveillance/whatever. Plenty of willing replacements ready at any time.

Long term strategically planned reduction of average salary by replacing uppity rockstars/activists with the groveling creme de la creme of codemonkeys is part of the plan.

lonelyasacloud 1 hour ago|||
> They can currently scoop up an endless supply of developers that have memorized every single leetcode hard, system design and """behavioral""" interview question.

And will those help them get where they think they want to go?

Traubenfuchs 19 minutes ago|||
Yes.

Meta stock is up 33% last year, up 122% in the last 5 years. If that isn't "being where you want to be", I don't know what is.

QuantumNomad_ 37 minutes ago|||
Yes
2ndorderthought 51 minutes ago||||
I have no idea why you are being downvoted. This is probably the most rational take.

Some level of sacrifice is required when you feel super uncomfortable at work in the US. I get the arguments of "I can't lose my pay", but at the same time, if you aren't aligned with how they treat you now, what do you think they will be doing with that data? What does 1 year from now look like? 2 years? Do you think it will be less invasive? Or will they be tracking your eye movements as well, facial sentiment?

mc32 1 hour ago||||
Exactly.

It’s the same defeatist attitude people who get an extra three months of pay to train their Eastern European or Indian replacements.

They will gladly take the three months pay to train a replacement. I’d quit on the spot. Let them figure it out.

leetrout 1 hour ago||||
Money, of course. Both greed and comfort.
sheepscreek 1 hour ago||
And existing obligations. Most people I know, myself including, stretch our current situation as the paycheque grows.

Some of it is intentional. A lot of it is slow creep (“ah, I can afford a, b, c now..that Maserati/Porche Cayenne GTS/Urus-lol I’ve always wanted!”). While you’re doing this, your spouse and kids are doing it 2x - “oh dad got that fancy new car! I guess I can ask him for the special edition Jordans now..”). Out of guilt, you let your family join in on the buying frenzy.

Now you’ve landed yourself with new loans and obligations (more expensive car = higher maintenance cost, same with house, etc - higher expectation all around, keeping up with Joneses, charity events, …).

Getting out of all that is much more difficult than overcoming your own greed and discomfort - many are legal obligations and you basically need a multi-year plan to go back unscathed (assuming you and your family are pragmatic enough to readjust your comfort level). For some it can be leaving useful social obligations - you lose your social circle if you downgrade (may have to move further away, no more club or association memberships).

The only real remedy is to not let your expenditure go up when you get a raise. But it’s less about you and in equal measure about how your partner operates, kids, family, their expectations etc. All in all, odds are not in an average Meta employees favour no matter what they might personally think/feel.

etrautmann 32 minutes ago||
I think it can be radically more pedestrian than this. Just affording basic life in a high COL area is insane. Getting an apt in NY and paying for childcare for two kids can already be a 16k/mo endeavor, no porche entering the equation.
rubyfan 31 minutes ago||||
My guess is people put up with this shit because the job market is terrible right now and most other workplaces in big tech will follow suite soon.
miroljub 1 hour ago||||
There are other methods broadly classified as self-defense that an employee can apply against a company and its officials who attack their privacy.

Let Meta and its officials feel the consequences of their actions.

KumaBear 56 minutes ago||
If it’s company equipment it’s fair game. Literally everytime I sign in it states I have no expectation of privacy while using the equipment.
addandsubtract 37 minutes ago||
The American mind can't comprehend privacy. Just because it's company equipment doesn't make it "fair game" to spy and track you.
pinkmuffinere 1 hour ago||||
> Have people lost their spine? seriously, quit your job. this is insane. why are americans putting up with this bullshit?

Come on, they may be caring for children, sick relatives, or have a million other reasons to want a stable, well-paying job. There are many well-justified reasons they could have to stay, and yet want to opt-out. "Just quit your job" is extremely out-of-touch.

embedding-shape 1 hour ago||
Claiming that developers and technology workers at Meta are working there because that's the only stable, well-paying job they can find, is extremely out of touch. People forget how comfortable us developers really have it, compared to almost any other field out there.
figmert 1 hour ago||||
> Have people lost their spine? seriously, quit your job. this is insane. why are americans putting up with this bullshit?

While I agree with you, sadly not everyone is in a position to just quit so easily, and even if the majority of the company quits, there are always people who are desperate enough to do the work and not complain.

bdangubic 53 minutes ago||||
got two words for you - money
ben_w 1 hour ago||||
> Have people lost their spine?

Yes, but this being Meta who are one of the several poster-children for surveillance capitalism, this comes across as more a face-leopard than a missing spine: https://old.reddit.com/r/LeopardsAteMyFace/

> seriously, quit your job. this is insane. why are americans putting up with this bullshit?

Have you seen the job market lately? Not just in the USA, but also in the USA, there's a lot of people holding on to whatever they've got because it's hard to find replacement work.

JKCalhoun 27 minutes ago|||
I wonder though is we're not approaching a time when even those who clung to their jobs will be join gin those out of work. My wife, FWIW, was just laid off from Agilent after having worked there for close to three decades. We were fortunate to see it as an opportunity for her to take her retirement.

I don't doubt there are plenty at Meta who, if not nearing retirement age (my wife still technically had another seven or so years), might have been harboring some desire to take some time off to hike the Big Three trail in the U.S. Or perhaps write a novel.

Seriously.

nacozarina 48 minutes ago|||
good times create weak men and we had it so good for so long it ruined us
everdrive 14 minutes ago||
As much as everyone is rightly dunking on meta employees, it's an interesting slice of the population. Anyone who cared about surveillance and privacy (and addiction, and societal health, etc.) wouldn't be working for meta in the first place. The hypocrisy point is correct to point out, but I do wonder why this is a bridge too far for them.
yfw 1 hour ago||
Read Careless People. The fish rots from the head
throwaway2037 17 minutes ago||
I gotta say, the opening line is a gem of British humour:

    > Meta, the company built on watching everything its billions of users do online so it can keep them clicking on ragebait and targeted ads
I am laughing so hard right now.
nsbk 1 hour ago||
Surveillance for thee, not for me
louiereederson 1 hour ago|
Surveillance for all
bell-cot 1 hour ago||
That would imply that Zuck is being surveilled.
isodev 1 hour ago|||
Has anyone asked Palantir and their many subsidiaries and foundations what they have on Zuck?
breppp 55 minutes ago|||
He is using a mobile phone, his location is sold by the mobile company and can be bought for relatively cheap
GJim 32 minutes ago||
> his location is sold by the mobile company

Citation please.

breppp 3 minutes ago||
It's as far away as a google search, but:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/08/t-mobile-claimed...

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/ice-cell-m...

poulpy123 1 hour ago||
I don't see what can be trained with that, but it would be a nightmare to be always recorded like that
vanviegen 45 minutes ago||
You could use this to train an AI to behave like a Meta-employee. Meta seems to like the behavior of Meta-employees, or it wouldn't have hired so many. It would just prefer to have more of this behavior for less, so they'll try to use clankers instead of employees to produce the key strokes and mouse clicks.
derelicta 1 hour ago||
Probably to detect all variations of dangerous words such as "union", "genocide" and "peace".
rubyfan 33 minutes ago||
The Zuckerberg quote from the article reads like someone running for class president in high school.

> helps you achieve your goals, create what you want to see in the world, experience any adventure, be a better friend to those you care about, and grow to become the person you aspire to be.

… If you vote for me, all of your wildest dreams will come true. Thank you.

Devasta 54 minutes ago||
Meta employees shocked to find out they work for Meta.
mykowebhn 1 hour ago||
s/Irony/Schadenfreude/g
fhennig 1 hour ago|
In the actual article (not the headline) there is no mention of staff reporting to be unhappy.
thejokeisonme 1 hour ago||
The actual irony is that this very title is the ragebait, as they say in the article:

> .. so it can keep them clicking on ragebait ..

wzdd 1 hour ago||
Quotes from unhappy staff are in the Business Insider article which the article links to in its third paragraph.
fhennig 1 hour ago||
Ah I saw it now through another HN submission.
More comments...