Top
Best
New

Posted by bumbledraven 17 hours ago

I am building a cloud(crawshaw.io)
909 points | 453 commentspage 6
import 16 hours ago|
Article doesn’t really tell what fundamental problems will be solved, except fancy VM allocation. Nothing about hardware, networking, reliability, tooling and such. Well, nice, good luck.
esher 15 hours ago||
Much respect for the ambitous plan, I wish I could do such bold thinking. I am running a small PHP PaaS (fortrabbit) for more than 10 years. For me, it's not only "scratch your own itch", but also "know your audience". So, a limited feature set with a high level of abstraction can also be useful for some users > clear path.
synack 12 hours ago||
Have we already forgotten about the NSA's "SSL added and removed here! :)" slide that Snowden showed us?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6641378

stingraycharles 11 hours ago|
I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make.

Cloud is bad?

synack 11 hours ago|||
Nevermind, I misread their HTTPS proxy documentation. Cloud is fine.
ianberdin 6 hours ago||
“Everything is shit. Believe me. We will do something better, just believe me.”

Jokes aside: - k8s is insane peace of software. A right tool for a big problem. Not for your toys. Yes, it is crazy difficult to setup and manage. Then what?

- cloud has bad and slow disk. BS. They have perfectly fast NVME.

Something else? That’s it.

Why I am so confident? I used to setup and manage kubernetes for 2 years. I have some experience. Do I use it more? Nope. Not a right tool for me. Ansible with some custom Linux tools fits better for Me.

I also build my own cloud. But if I say it less loud: hosting to host websites for https://playcode.io. Yea, it is hard and with a lot of compromises. Like networking, yes I want to communicate between vms in any region. Or disks and reliability. What about snapshots? And many bare metal renters gives only 1Gbt/s. Which is not fine. Or they ask way more for 10Gbt uplink. So it is easy to build some limited and unreliable shit or non scalable.

aayushdutt 10 hours ago||
Wondering what runtime is the infra under the hood. Firecracker? Traditional VM? Docker Containers?
crawshaw 9 hours ago|
Author here. Most of our infra is custom, the VMM is based on cloud-hypervisor (a project spiritually similar to Firecracker). We have a lot of work to do, including on the VMM, but right now there is more value for users if we spend our time on the VM management layer and GLB.
germandiago 4 hours ago||
Let me see if I understand it. The TL;DR is that instead of asking for VMs and fit things there you reserve the CPU and RAM and do with that whatever you want? Number of mVMs, etc.?
speedgoose 15 hours ago||
I welcome the initiative but it’s pretty costly compared to the bare metal cloud providers. So the value as to be the platform as service too.
kjok 16 hours ago||
How difficult is it to build a second startup on the side?
z3t4 15 hours ago||
You can run several VM's or containers with isolation on your phone hardware, why even use the cloud when you just want to show your friends?
skybrian 14 hours ago|
For me it’s so my coding agent keeps running when I close my laptop lid and it goes to sleep. VM in the cloud because I’m too lazy to set up a computer to be running as a server all the time.
Growtika 15 hours ago|
Congrats. Just checked your homepage. I love the fact you also show this comment

"That must be worst website ever made"

Made me love the site and style even more

More comments...