Top
Best
New

Posted by Vaslo 18 hours ago

Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs(www.bloomberg.com)
https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/23/meta-job-cuts-10-percent-8...
639 points | 615 commentspage 3
SpaceNoodled 6 hours ago|
Nice to see that decimation is back in style
ardit33 17 hours ago||
I left Meta a while ago... but these layoffs (multiple rounds every year) have been very demoralizing to the folks there.

I survived all three rounds of layoffs, but I saw multiple great colleagues (some of them had been there for 10+ years), getting laid off. After so many re-orgs, I had enough and quit. It was just not worth it (all that uncertainity, people were unhappy, hunger games into trying to get a good rating, etc).

I think Zuck is taking its "Meta" failure (VR) into his own employees. After their treatment, many good people don't want to join Meta anymore, hence he had to spend so much money into buying engineers to join.

I think it is the start of a downwards spiral.

dlev_pika 15 hours ago||
It’s so funny to see the likes of Zuck, telling the world they take “full responsibility” for the bad decisions they spend fortunes on, and then fire everyone else while they suffer no direct consequences at all.
the_biot 15 hours ago||
Right. People on here are just ignoring the fact that the fantastically expensive metaverse effort has failed, and it's pretty obvious that people working on it thus no longer have anything to do, so will mostly be let go. The article even mentions this as a likely cause.

I mean I get it, Meta is evil, inefficient etc, but this layoff round seems pretty predictable.

givemeethekeys 15 hours ago||
With the way people get added and removed from big tech, why is having worked at these companies still considered a badge of honor?
Ifkaluva 14 hours ago|
I don’t know if it’s a badge of honor, but it’s definitely highly desirable because they pay a lot. The term FAANG was originally coined to group together extremely high paying companies.

Basically, if you are L5 or above and can survive 4 years at Meta, you’re guaranteed to be a millionaire by the end of it. Go to levels.fyi and do the math yourself.

whatever1 17 hours ago||
Let me guess. Year of efficiency?
bradlys 14 hours ago|
It’s being coined the decade of efficiency now.
rbanffy 17 hours ago||
Every time something like this happens I think that at least one person made a very bad cash flow decision and now needs to cover a hole they dug out themselves.

Sadly, they are never the ones to be sacked.

marcosdumay 16 hours ago|
They are probably reacting to the general economy.
rbanffy 16 hours ago||
The scariest thing is that people with this amount of responsibility was caught by surprise.
franczesko 5 hours ago||
If there's a number given, the reason is secondary.
janalsncm 12 hours ago||
I wonder if the quality of YC applications will go up as more engineers find themselves in need of a job.

It would really be poetic justice if some former employees of established companies went for the jugular of massive SaaS incumbents.

xtracto 12 hours ago|
This really should be the case. If AI tools are really making it easier to build stuff, we should see hordes of new startups solving all kinds of problems thar were difficult or expensive to solve before.

I've been seeing this in the startup ive been for the past year. We are 20 people, and are solving fiscal reconciliation problems for HUGE companies in my country. Building thing that were just not scalable before.

I'm waiting for all the cool startups in both b2b and b2c that solve health, time spending or money problems.

byzantinegene 4 hours ago||
in theory yes, but all the money is going into AI or AI-adjacent startups that no one would actually build a product that solves problems if it doesn't incorporate AI in it.
deferredgrant 15 hours ago||
A cut this big usually means the company let itself get too sprawling and is now correcting late. That does not make it less rough for the people getting hit, but it does make the move pretty unsurprising.
jonnonz 17 hours ago||
What happened to the metaverse ?I suspect maybe wasting all the resource wasn’t a good idea
autophagian 3 hours ago|
The whole concept just didn't have any legs.
dnsb 17 hours ago|
I came across this article recently and watching it play it out is wild: https://readuncut.com/the-survivors-paradox-how-layoffs-turn...

whilst they get efficiencies and may improve margins, the long term damage of culture and having 'yes men' will damage their business far more than a few quarters of tighter growth and margins.

More comments...