Top
Best
New

Posted by koshyjohn 1 day ago

AI should elevate your thinking, not replace it(www.koshyjohn.com)
812 points | 571 commentspage 13
shumatsumonobu 1 day ago|
[dead]
tripleee 1 day ago||
[dead]
Deeds67 1 day ago||
[dead]
jacobmei 23 hours ago||
[dead]
yjadsfgasdf 4 hours ago||
[dead]
itsuckslol 6 hours ago||
[dead]
debatox 19 hours ago||
[dead]
sk0w 11 hours ago||
*you're

/s

phpisatrash 1 day ago||
[flagged]
1ncorrect 1 day ago|
‘AI’ is my newest litmus test for whether who I’m engaging with should be taken seriously or not.

‘AI’ doesn’t exist, and LLMs have vanishingly narrow legitimate justifiable use cases. Any output from one is intrinsically, explosively, imprecise, and can’t be trusted to be build upon without specialist treatment. I’m yet to identify any application of a LLM which can rationally be mistaken for intelligence.

Anyone who persists in referring to LLMs as ‘AI’ is either betraying they don’t understand what they’re talking about, or they’re invested too deeply in an active grift.

j-conn 1 day ago||
> ‘AI’ doesn’t exist, and LLMs have vanishingly narrow legitimate justifiable use cases. … I’m yet to identify any application of a LLM which can rationally be mistaken for intelligence.

What’s the opposite of AI psychosis? Burying your head in the sand? Because anyone who could write this unironically today is certainly afflicted.

1ncorrect 1 day ago||
No one who is impressed by the current applications of LLMs should be in any way involved with making decisions which affect those not similarly cognitively impaired.

It’s no different to religions or economics.

sirsau 23 hours ago||
Hard to argue with you when disagreeing with your point makes me cognitively impaired.
1ncorrect 22 hours ago||
I always welcome, and look forward to, being proven wrong.
koshyjohn 1 day ago|||
[dead]
cindyllm 1 day ago||
[dead]