Top
Best
New

Posted by koshyjohn 18 hours ago

AI should elevate your thinking, not replace it(www.koshyjohn.com)
620 points | 450 commentspage 6
e1ghtSpace 7 hours ago|
what if it seems ai has literally replaced your thinking? Is there a way to unreplace it? im talking literally.
smj-edison 17 hours ago||
On the point of avoiding the struggle of learning, I think it's easy to swing too far the other direction and go back to not using modern development tools. I think it is doing a new learner a disservice by saying something like "don't use GDB/REPL/AI tool to learn, since you'll never learn the fundamentals". I think all of these tools allow for learning, if that's how the learner engages with them. So I hope that AI becomes integrated in the learning process, as far as it accelerates and doesn't replace understanding.
poszlem 4 hours ago||
"What do such machines really do? They increase the number of things we can do without thinking. Things we do without thinking-there's the real danger" - Frank Herbert, God Emperor of Dune
throwyawayyyy 16 hours ago||
> Going back to the analogies: This is like copying answers through university and then showing up to a job that requires independent thought.

That's exactly what is happening now. I wouldn't even call it an analogy, I'd call it an example of where AI is already having a baleful effect. FWIW I don't disagree with the article's thesis or the examples: yes, absolutely, if used well AI can elevate engineers in exactly this way and it behooves us engineers to use it in that way. We can also say that the deliberate design of the AI systems we are constantly being exhorted to use inclines them towards work-slop and abdicated thinking.

protocolture 14 hours ago||
This is why I feel like its fine that AI stay as inaccurate as it is.

I learn so much arguing with it.

woeirua 15 hours ago||
I don’t get why we shouldn’t outsource our thinking to the AI. As it becomes more capable, eventually it will be more competent than the average engineer. At that point companies should be _requiring_ the AI to make the larger decisions. By the end of this year AI might be better than all but the very best engineers. Then what?
apsurd 15 hours ago|
that's a lot of speculation based on one year of data. We don't actually have the results yet, is the main issue as i understand.
bilsbie 16 hours ago||
It’s weird I have basically a free private tutor in any subject and I use it a lot.

Yet nothing has actually changed.

hpbc5 18 hours ago||
Theory of Bounded Rationality and its implications is something they should teach everyone.
koshyjohn 14 hours ago|
Thank you for sharing this. We are all less rational than we imagine ourselves to be, even if we're hyper-critical of ourselves and exercise a lot of intellectual humility.
fermatf 17 hours ago||
For couple of last weeks, I use AI to speedup my thinking process. Instead of think about something to come up to conclusion, I let AI brainstorm for me and then select. Not for everything, but I found it faster with AI. Having taste on select the ai output is important though.
mrdootdoot 17 hours ago|
I’ve never been busier and more challenged than I am now.
More comments...