Top
Best
New

Posted by ca98am79 19 hours ago

I bought Friendster for $30k – Here's what I'm doing with it(ca98am79.medium.com)
963 points | 493 commentspage 7
anshulbhide 7 hours ago|
I love the internet.
gnabgib 19 hours ago||
Related: Friendster Relaunch (28 points, 3 days ago, 14 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883307

Ask HN: How to make Friendster great? (98 points, 11 months ago, 141 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44053119

dang 18 hours ago|
(The one from 3 days ago never made the frontpage so we won't treat it as a dupe)
kgwxd 17 hours ago||
Bought Friendster, posted about it on Medium. Can't wait for the Justin.tv live stream!
trueno 17 hours ago|
lmao i cannot stand medium. the amount of articles i've clicked into on medium that start with

"in todays fast paced business environment.."

the incentive structure on medium is so busted. just people churning out half-working insights to look good for job interviews or promotions, it's like the worlds laziest portfolio. it straight up isn't any sort of bastion of knowledge-share.

makes things like https://beej.us/guide/ an absolute treasure

trueno 17 hours ago||
i bought friendster for 30k, heres what it taught me about b2b sales
didip 11 hours ago||
I have to ask, what is the difference between this and private WhatsApp groups?
type0 16 hours ago||
I haven't tried it but meeting functionality for smaller groups would be good, specially for different kinds of hobby meetups.
TZubiri 17 hours ago||
Probably being pedantic, but this is not buying Friendster to be precise, usually what is meant by that is that the company was bought.

In this case the domain Friendster.com was bought, and a trademark was conceded (a new different trademark), I don't know precisely the implications of the trademark though, I think it's a different trademark and you still cannot imply that you are a continuation of the previous trademark holder, it's just that you are given monopoly over that word as a trademark.

Now, is that different than buying "Friendster"? A really interesting legal question, I think it is, and I think it has relevant implications, I don't think you can for example restore the website as it was and pretend a continuation as you would if you bought the company.

sikozu 16 hours ago|
I think the distinction is warranted.

Honestly if the prior Friendster company itself was bought - including all the assets, codebase and historical documents (no user details) that would've been such an incredibly interesting read.

Buying the domain and getting the trademark is still cool, just not as cool.

TZubiri 15 hours ago||
fwiw, I think that subjectively it's roughly equivalent in this specific case. The domain name is a huge part of the brand, and is almost equivalent to the list of prior clients.

I think that it will probably be fine if they compete in the same space of a social network, doesn't look like someone is going to go after them, the company that would have a claim against them is defunct, so even if they have a legal argument, who would raise the case? If the owners do so under their personal name it's even a weaker argument.

So in practice, in this case, subjectively I believe that it's effectively very similar as buying the company.

UncleSlacky 5 hours ago||
Maybe you could get together with the SpaceHey guy:

https://spacehey.com

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25245740

rc_kas 11 hours ago||
This will be the ONLY social media my kids are allowed to use.
davidtio 10 hours ago|
I visit the side but I don't have handphone so it seems like I get DQ-ed immediately. If the apps works on web will be nice.
More comments...