Top
Best
New

Posted by salkahfi 1 day ago

Zed 1.0(zed.dev)
2045 points | 663 commentspage 15
ggandhi 1 day ago|
Once there was Vim, and then there is Zed. In between I just found useless UI bloats.

Simply love it!

iainctduncan 1 day ago||
Serious question, is there any advantage to Zed if one does not use LLM assisted coding?
swiftcoder 1 day ago||
It is somewhat faster and a fair bit less memory hungry than vscode?
TeddyDD 1 day ago||
It's normal text editor like VSCode or Sublime. It's fast. The out of the box experience is good (auto configured LSP, tree sitter etc.)
atombender 1 day ago||
I've been using Jetbrains IntelliJ IDEA as my main IDE for Go, Rust, TypeScript, etc. for the last 3 years, and this Christmas I switched to Zed, and I'm not looking back.

I was admittedly skeptical of Zed in the beginning, because they started out with so few features, and it seemed impossible to really switch permanently to it and still be as productive. The Jetbrains platform has got such an amazingly rich set of features and an uncanny ability to just nail the editor experience. It seems almost unthinkable that anyone would be able to compete, and for a long time Zed was very far behind, but this year I feel they're finally a viable alternative.

What ultimately pushed me towards Zed was performance and the sheer amount of work-stopping bugs. I would have days where Jetbrains would get unresponsive or extremely sluggish. Suddenly "undo" would stop working (!). Major and minor upgrades often introduced perplexing performance degradation. In short, I've wasted insane amounts of time on bugs and on filing detailed bug reports that are never looked at. That undo bug has been open for maybe a year now.

For all the bells and whistles, I think Jetbrains faces an intractable problem. It's just utterly unrealistic that they'll be able to solve everything unless they stopped all development to focus on just stability. The product is too big, too complex, too unwieldy, and too bloated. I was always allocating 16GB RAM to Jetbrains, and often had it sit there consuming 1000% (!) CPU. Zed chews up a couple of gigs at most, and rarely uses much CPU. There's a tendency for editors to get bloated as they evolve. This certainly happens with Atom. I'm really hoping Zed will stay lean.

carlcortright 1 day ago||
Tried it yesterday. HUGE fan of how the agents work and how the editor feels.
Alex-Aachen 1 day ago||
Congratulations from me too — it quickly became my go-to editor (sorry, VSCode)
d0100 1 day ago||
Tried using Zed but for some reason the AI can't open the browser?
actinium226 1 day ago||
VSCode is draining my battery, looking forward to trying this
MichaelNolan 1 day ago||
I tried zed sometime ago, and the limiting factor was devcontainer support. It looks like they’ve made some progress there https://zed.dev/docs/dev-containers
oliverjanssen 1 day ago|
Yes, same. This feature is a must have - especially when running tools like Claude Code etc.
JnnydevDude 1 day ago||
Congrats guys! I've been using zed since a few months ago, I would consider myself a "light" user but I do enjoy the experience. My only sour point would be the not so smooth integration with claude code. But I've learmt to live with it for now
jxmesth 1 day ago|
Why do I get a warning when trying to run this on Windows 11?
8note 1 day ago|
windows makes it really hard to distribute applications now.

everything gets a warning until the app has some minimum count of installs

JCTheDenthog 1 day ago||
>everything gets a warning until the app has some minimum count of installs

Unless the devs sign their app

jxmesth 1 day ago||
So then the question is, why haven't they?
JCTheDenthog 1 day ago||
Because it's a huge pain in the ass to get set up (and requires paying Microsoft and providing them with all sorts of personal information). After initial setup it's not too bad, we have a few signed apps at my current employer.
More comments...