> Thanks for the report! This was an overactive anti-abuse system. Fixed.

Ah yes, cause who bothers to test any releases to actual paying customers

Is it just me or did a fucking AI refuse to give a refund and then add a meme of Leonardo DiCaprio? Are there any actual adults with judgment left?

there was a time when tech companies gave bug bounties. Now it's fuck you, we vibe coded this slop, and we love it. Oh we emailed your company, ran massive marketing campaigns in the media to pitch replacing you.

This is annoying since I have a side project I like to use alchemical names in, and HERMES.md sounds like something I would do. Guess I have to go with AGRIPPA.md, but Hermes Trismegistus is so much cooler...

I wonder when Anthropic will give refunds for all the sessions with nerfed / dumbed down Opus.

AI company not giving a refund?

I think people put this out of proportion. Yes, you can reason this is ethically correct - I don't object to this. But people used Anthropic, Claude etc... in the first place. Why would you use something to then be disappointed about how it performs, when it comes to AI? Would not be the better and easier strategy to ... not use it in the first place, and make yourself dependable on AI? I don't fully understand this. I would not run into a similar situation because I simply don't use any AI. I actively want to support those folks who don't use AI either - that way we can point out all the ill effects of AI, such as in the case of Anthropic to prioritize on greed.

They just lost the Claude lottery, that’s all.

They're humanists. Haven't you seen those awesome chalk drawings outside their hq?

“It’s not personal, Sonny. It’s strictly business.”

Another reason to avoid Anthropic products now.