Top
Best
New

Posted by elmean 20 hours ago

Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"(twitter.com)
https://xcancel.com/theo/status/2049645973350363168
1168 points | 640 commentspage 6
justinlevine 12 hours ago||
Honestly, this isn't a change really from how anthropic has operated for a long, long time. They did the same with OpenCode, pi, etc. There isn't anything that can stop you from using the SDK, however.
tobias2014 11 hours ago|
[dead]
Unovia 9 hours ago||
Wonder if they tested that with actual code.
__blockcipher__ 19 hours ago||
Anthropic is losing a ton of goodwill by not being more honest about their constraints. They've been buckling under load for months, and instead of doing the most honest thing (keep weekly usage limits same, make 5 hour usage limits have surge pricing where the usage-cost of X tokens is scaled based on dynamic load), they're doing a lot of hacky things to try to get a similar effect. I suspect they feel the optics of being honest would be too bad, so instead it's a slow bleed where they piss off users one by one
crazygringo 16 hours ago||
The problem is, if you are transparent about your constraints, then users who are using your subscription in bad faith and against the terms, they know exactly how to maximize usage.

It's the same thing when people say that Gmail ought to publish the rules they use for blacklisting senders. If they did, then there would be a lot more senders abusing email.

Whenever you are defining rules internally for catching bad actors, you cannot make those rules public. It defeats the entire purpose.

So maybe Anthropic is losing good will, but it's better than the alternatives.

brianwmunz 18 hours ago||
yeah exactly the opacity is doing more damage than the limits themselves. anyone who's worked with AI knows there's a lot of limits you need to contend with. secret behavior changes are another level of badness.
avaer 12 hours ago||
This is what being banned in the age of LLMs will look like.
bfrog 16 hours ago||
I asked claude if it thought openclaw was better. It said it didn't know what openclaw was.
userbinator 8 hours ago||
I am reminded of user-agent sniffing and the idiocy that created. One would hope that this leads to less self-identifying overall. At this point it looks less like a cat-and-mouse game but more like a cat-and-cat game, but all the cats are equally retarded. I suppose it makes for good entertainment for the rest of us who don't need to use, and now have another reason not to start using, all this AI stuff.
khimaros 18 hours ago||
possibly related, it errors if my working directory is a checkout of OpenCode. i was using CC to work on some patches for OC and had to work in a parent directory and then tell Claude to work on the files inside the "opencode" folder.
andrew_eu 14 hours ago||
A friendly reminder to any Claude subscribers, that you were probably auto-opted-in to "Extra Usage". You can disable it on the "Usage" page [0] before getting a bill for "extra" usage.

0: https://claude.ai/settings/usage

outside1234 16 hours ago|
We are going to need agent neutrality laws soon.
More comments...