DECT is definitely neat. But it’s significantly different than LoRa. At the lowest/slowest modulation you might get single digit kilometers out of it.
Doesn’t change my excitement about it a bit though. Eager to get this onto my workbench!
K0balt 9 hours ago||
Is the design for this open source? I’m not an rf guy so it would be really handy to be able to reuse some parts of this in my sensor network on our farm. I can do the digital and sensor part all day, but I respect the skill of rf engineering in getting decent performance out of tiny pcbs.
syntaxing 17 hours ago||
I know it’s all open source and I’m not paying for anything so I cant be choosy. But after playing with a bunch of Lora peer to peer chat systems. All I wish is a chat service that uses haloW. Since it uses wifi backend, regular wifi should work as well.
thombles 15 hours ago||
Is the poster maybe confusing bandwidth (range of frequencies over which a single board can work) with bandwidth (data transfer speeds in bits per second)?
With that frequency range, I really hope the people using it have radio licenses.
subscribed 1 hour ago|
For 2.4GHz?
janandonly 17 hours ago||
How does this compare to Meshtastic, MeshCore and Bitchat?
nunobrito 15 hours ago|
Doesn't. That is like comparing the network connection with apps.
Network doesn't usually care much about the apps running on top of it.
yborg 17 hours ago|
Cue xkcd on standards. I've been interested in mesh radio, and I keep hoping that a winner will emerge. Probably won't until a large commercial vendor gets interested and picks one.