Top
Best
New

Posted by dryadin 6 days ago

New statue in London, attributed to Banksy, of a suited man, blinded by a flag(www.smithsonianmag.com)
570 points | 554 commentspage 7
MrBuddyCasino 6 days ago|
Really makes you think. I guess Palestine and Ukraine should just give up.
rjinman 6 days ago||
No, you don’t understand, it’s only British national flags that are bad!
dickens5 6 days ago|||
[flagged]
ebbi 6 days ago||
Israel should give up on the apartheid, genocide, and the war crimes. No one but the worst of the worst Zionists want to see the continuation of the last 80 years.
jojobas 6 days ago||
You can't seriously put Palestine and Ukraine in the same sentence like this.
arduanika 6 days ago||
Sure he can. Both of them have flags, and all flags are bad. They blow in your face and make you dumb. Why can't world be less dumb? So many dumb flag people. I do art.
Markoff 6 days ago||
So anyone can now place whatever they want in public space in UK or some people like Banksy are more equal than the other people? I find this statue offensive for double standards.

This should go quickly away unless they confirm he had official permit and he is just "anti-establishment" hipster.

tim333 5 days ago|
I put my bin bags out on the pavement in Westminster too but the bastards seem to judge them as less artistic and take them away.
cineticdaffodil 6 days ago||
The final desperate shivers of a dying worldview, thats financially and socially so detached from the rest of the nation they couldn't even grasp when they got colonized.
henry2023 6 days ago|
Colonized by who?
tim333 5 days ago|||
A lot of Americans like Musk et al get upset that we have some muslim immigrants. You get a lot of this weird we're colonised stuff when it's actually about 7% of the population and we used to do a lot of real colonisation the other way around with British India and the like.
JuniperMesos 5 days ago||
British people were never anywhere close to 7% of the population of British India.
tim333 5 days ago||
I was trying to say muslims are about 7% of the UK population.
cineticdaffodil 6 days ago|||
By you
ignoramous 6 days ago|
Despite the denials, the answer is most likely this was all coordinated with LEAs.

  Some artists have questioned if Banksy, once considered anti-establishment, now enjoys special treatment from Britain's powers that be.

  In 2014, Vice Media asked: 'Why Is Banksy the Only Person Allowed to Vandalize Britain’s Walls?' The story quoted David Speed, a street artist who ran a British graffiti collective. "It's very much one rule for him and another rule for everyone else ... When street artists do it, it's vandalism. When Banksy does it, it's an art piece."

  Contacted by Reuters, Speed praised Banksy as "a really important artist of modern times." Yet he still wonders why "one artist should be able to have carte blanche and everyone else would be subject to penalties."
In Search of Banksy, https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/global-a... (2026).
brookst 6 days ago|
Not sure I agree it’s “most likely” when the linked article presents no evidence of LEA awareness or complicity, just one person speculating.

I know firsthand what can be done with a hardhat, clipboard, and high-viz vest. IMO it is far more likely that Banksy is just really good at social engineering in ways that other street artists are not.

nicoburns 6 days ago|||
I imagine this just isn't that difficult to get away with. Most areas are basically empty in the early hours of the morning (even in the middle of the city). And people doing some kind of engineering or installation work at that time would also not be that unusual.
noosphr 6 days ago||||
The difference is that you'd get a police visit and your artwork torn down if you're not Banksy.
arrrg 6 days ago|||
Just goes to show the power of his art. I don’t find that bit the least bit surprising but this inconsistency always has been at the heart of his art for me and to a large extent also what his work is about.
kerridge0 6 days ago||||
mainly because it's worth a lot of money...
yreg 6 days ago|||
That doesn't mean it was coordinated.
adzm 6 days ago||||
Plus this is pretty much the only street artist with worldwide name recognition; of course things are going to be different.
huflungdung 6 days ago||||
[dead]
mike_hearn 6 days ago|||
Yes, London is famously free of surveillance and the Met is famously tolerant of political speech. Certainly, if someone had put up a statue of a pro-Palestine protester being blinded by a flag Sadiq Khan would just stand around being puzzled and letting things be. No question about it.
brookst 5 days ago||
Oh, if you’re moving the goalposts from “Banksy had official support putting it up” to “the authorities reacted differently after the fact than they would have for others”, then I actually agree.
mike_hearn 5 days ago||
Official support and not interfering with it being put up are nearly the same thing. It's not like throwing up a statue is some complex operation only governments can carry out.
brookst 2 days ago||
“Officials knew in advance and helped or actively decided not to interfere” is NOT nearly the same thing as “Banksy’s team used social engineering to blend in and go unquestioned”.

The claim was that they had government assistance doing the project. IMO that’s just a conspiracy theory to explain what “bunch of construction workers with flatbed truck, traffic cones, and high viz vests” sufficiently explains.