Show HN: Hallucinopedia

adolfhitler0 3 days ago|

[flagged]

ivanvoid 3 days ago||

kinda cool but kinda lame, no overall consistency over articles

bstrama 3 days ago|

Used to be a problem - now consistent for new articles ;)

kelseydh 3 days ago|

"Despite its failure, the Great Pigeon Census of 1887 is remembered as a cautionary tale..."

This type of writing is considered non-encyclopedic by Wikipedia standards as it injects superficial analysis. The imitation articles would look better without it. Maybe train on this article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing

arowthway 3 days ago|

Why is this example non-encyclopedic? It's an informative, falsifiable statement that could be supported by a citation, like here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thongbu_Wainucha#:~:text=remem...